Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Active, not recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT03716349 |
Other study ID # |
201809844 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Active, not recruiting |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
January 1, 2019 |
Est. completion date |
April 2026 |
Study information
Verified date |
May 2024 |
Source |
University of Iowa |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
To compare a newly developed filling composite to a current filling composite system. Two
restorations will be placed in each subject, one using system A and one using system B. The
first system listed in the randomization pair will be placed on first tooth (#4-#13), and the
second system on 2nd tooth (#4-#13). The same three researchers will be responsible for
placement of all the restorations.
Description:
The aim of this (12-month; 36-month; 60-month) randomized controlled clinical trial is to
evaluate and compare the esthetic outcomes and patient satisfaction of a simplified newly
developed dental composite system (system A)for the esthetic region to a nanohybrid composite
system (Filtek Supreme Ultra-system B) placed in class III, IV and V lesions. Even though
dental composite systems have been used extensively for the anterior region, clinicians face
challenges with shade selection and longevity of the material over the years. This new system
has been developed to improve the esthetic outcomes and patient satisfaction by enhancing the
blending capability of the material.
Dental composite systems have been used for 50 years as state of art materials to restore the
anterior region. Significant development has occurred regarding the composition and structure
of dental composites, improving the longevity of these restorations; however, clinicians are
faced with the challenge of selecting the most adequate shade and restorative technique to
reproduce missing tooth structure.
Depending on the size of the cavity preparation, a single layer of material or multiple
layers might be needed to reproduce dentin and enamel. Different dental composite systems
offer multiple body, dentin, and enamel shades. Therefore, clinicians are faced with the
challenge of recreating nature using this material. Different devices, such as
spectrophotometers have been introduced on the market for shade selection. However, one of
the most important aspects when placing anterior composites is the esthetic outcome based on
the patient's assessment. Therefore, this study will evaluate the esthetic outcomes of a
simplified and a conventional dental composite system based on the provider's and patient's
assessment.