Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03101137
Other study ID # N6-2016/MD
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase Phase 4
First received November 14, 2016
Last updated February 20, 2018
Start date February 2016
Est. completion date January 15, 2018

Study information

Verified date February 2018
Source Kasr El Aini Hospital
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Caudal epidural anesthesia is one of the most common regional techniques used for post-operative pain management in pediatric patients. In this study we are going to compare the effects of caudal bupivacaine , caudal Dexamethasone with bubivacaine and Dexmedetomidine with bupivacaine on the systemic vascular resistance and the cardiac output, in pediatric patients undergoing lower abdominal surgeries, by using the electrical cardiometry (EC).


Description:

Participants will be randomly allocated by a computer-generated table into one of the 3 study groups; the randomization sequence was concealed in sealed envelopes. The three study groups were as follows:

Group A: Caudal Dexmedetomidine block group (DEXM) (n= 16) will receive caudal block using the bupivacaine 0.25% and Dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg with the conventional general anesthesia,

Group B: caudal Dexamethasone Block group (DEXA) (n =16) will receive caudal block using the bupivacaine 0.25% and Dexamethasone 0.1 mg/kg with the conventional general anesthesia,

Group C: caudal with bubivacaine (CONTROL) group (n = 16) will receive caudal block using the bupivacaine 0.25% and general anesthesia.

After induction of general anesthesia, the electrodes of the electrical cardiometry will be applied on the child neck and chest in the supine position and a measurement for the baseline cardiac output, systemic vascular resistance and stroke volume will be taken using the electrical cardiometry. Baseline blood pressure and heart rate will be also recorded.Then, another measurement for the systemic cardiac output, vascular resistance, stroke volume heart rate and blood pressure will be taken at 5minutes, 10 minutes, 20 minutes and 30 minutes after caudal block. The measurements will be stored and analyzed off-line.

The Electrical Cardiometry device that will be used is the ICON™ monitor; (the Portable Noninvasive Hemodynamic Monitor manufactured by Osypka Medical Company). The measurements will be stored and analyzed off-line. The average values during three consecutive measures will be considered for the analysis.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 48
Est. completion date January 15, 2018
Est. primary completion date December 2017
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 1 Year to 7 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

1. Pediatric patients 1 - 7 years.

2. Both genders (male & female).

3. ASA I & ASA II patients.

4. Children scheduled for lower abdominal elective surgeries including genitourinary and perineal regions surgeries.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Parents' refusal of regional block.

2. Patients requiring emergency procedures.

3. Bleeding disorders.

4. Skin lesions or wounds at site of proposed needle insertion.

5. Cutaneous anomalies (angioma, hair tuft, nevus or a dimple) near the puncture point requiring radiological examination (ultrasound, CT or MRI).

6. Progressive neurological disorders.

7. Patients with congenital heart disease.

8. Patients with Allergies to used drugs

9. Surgeries with large fluid shift or massive blood loss.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
Caudal block with dexmedetomedine
After induction, the electrical cardiometry is applied in supine position and a measurement for the baseline cardiac output, systemic vascular resistance and stroke volume is taken. In left lateral position, the back is sterilized. The block is done by introducing a 23-gauge needle perpendicular to the sacrococcygeal membrane. The needle is inserted until there is release of resistance as it pierces the sacro-coccygeal membrane. Then, it is directed upwards to make an angle of 20-30° with the skin about 2 mm. 1 ml/kg bupivacaine 0.25% along with dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg (diluted with normal saline to 1ml) is injected over about 60s. Then, another measurement for the hemodynamics is taken at 5, 10, 20 and 30 minutes after caudal block.
Caudal dexamethasone
After induction, the electrical cardiometry is applied in supine position and a measurement for the baseline cardiac output, systemic vascular resistance and stroke volume is taken. In left lateral position, the back is sterilized. The block is done by introducing a 23-gauge needle perpendicular to the sacrococcygeal membrane. The needle is inserted until there is release of resistance as it pierces the sacro-coccygeal membrane. Then, it is directed upwards to make an angle of 20-30° with the skin about 2 mm. 1 ml/kg bupivacaine 0.25% along with dexamethasone 0.1mg/kg (diluted with normal saline to 1ml) is injected over about 60s. Then, another measurement for the hemodynamics is taken at 5, 10, 20 and 30 minutes after caudal block.
Control (bupivacaine)
After induction, the electrical cardiometry is applied in supine position and a measurement for the baseline cardiac output, systemic vascular resistance and stroke volume is taken. In left lateral position, the back is sterilized. The block is done by introducing a 23-gauge hypodermic needle perpendicular to the sacrococcygeal membrane. The needle is inserted until there is release of resistance as it pierces the sacro-coccygeal membrane. Then, it is directed upwards to make an angle of 20-30° with the skin about 2 mm. 1 ml/kg the control (bupivacaine) 0.25% is injected over about 60s. Then, another measurement for the hemodynamics is taken at 5, 10, 20 and 30 minutes after caudal block.

Locations

Country Name City State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Kasr El Aini Hospital

References & Publications (15)

1) Shah N., Patel J., Chhaya A. and Upadhyaya R. Comparison of general anesthesia v/s caudal epidural in pediatric infra umbilical surgeries. International J of Biomed Res. 2015; 6(01): 35- 9.

10) Rajput RS, Das S., Chauhan S., Bisoi AK. & Vasdev S. Comparison of Cardiac Output Measurement by Noninvasive Method with Electrical Cardiometry and Invasive Method with Thermodilution Technique in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. Wor J Cardiovas S. 2014 ;(4): 123-130.

13) Almajali Z., Batarseh E., Daameh S., Qabha A., Haddadin M. Comparison Of Postoperative Pain Relief Impact Between Caudal Bupivacaine Alone And Caudal Bupivacaine-Dexamethasone Mixture Administration For Pediatric Local Tube Urethroplasty. J Roy Med Serv. 2014; 21(4): 19-24.

14) Dalal S., Paul A. and Tirpude NG. Clinical Evaluation of Caudal Clonidine as an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Sub Umbilical Surgeries. Research Chronicle in health sciences. 2015; 1(2): 110-121.

15) Alsadek W., Al-Gohari M., Elsonbaty M., Nassar N.& Alkonaiesy R. Ultrasound Guided TAP Block Versus Ultrasound Guided Caudal Block For Pain Relief In Children Undergoing Lower Abdominal Surgeries. Egyp J of Anaesth. 2015; (31): 155-160.

2) Almajali Z., Batarseh E., Daameh S., Qabha A. and Haddadin M. Comparison of Postoperative Pain Relief Impact between Caudal Bupivacaine Alone and Caudal Bupivacaine-Dexamethasone Mixture Administration for Pediatric Local Tube Urethroplasty. J of The R Med Serv. 2014; 21(4): 19-24.

3) Butterworth J., Mackey,D. & Wasnick,J. Morgan & Mikhail's Clinical Anesthesiology. 5th ed. the United States: McGraw-Hill Education, LLC. 2013; 877-905.

5) Bhaskar D. , Kumar P. , Mridul S. , Vipin D. , Vivek T. and Mohamed A. Comparison Of Caudal Dexmedetomidine And Fentanyl For Postoperative Analgesia. J of Adv Res in Bio Scien. 2014; 6 (1) 51-7.

6) El Gendy H.A. & Elsharnouby N.M. Ultrasound Guided Single Injection Caudal Epidural Anesthesia Of Isobaric Bupivacaine With/Without Dexamethasone For Geriatric Patients Undergoing Total Hip Replacement Surgery. Egyptian Journal of Anesthesia. 2014; 30: 293- 8.

Deng M, Wang X, Wang L, Zheng S. The hemodynamic effects of newborn caudal anesthesia assessed by transthoracic echocardiography: a randomized, double-blind, controlled study. Paediatr Anaesth. 2008 Nov;18(11):1075-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2008.02786.x. — View Citation

Farrag WS, Ibrahim AS, Mostafa MG, Kurkar A, Elderwy AA. Ketamine versus magnesium sulfate with caudal bupivacaine block in pediatric inguinoscrotal surgery: A prospective randomized observer-blinded study. Urol Ann. 2015 Jul-Sep;7(3):325-9. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.152039. — View Citation

Galante D, Pellico G, Meola S, Caso A, De Capraris A, Milillo R, Mirabile C, Olivieri M, Cinnella G, Dambrosio M. Hemodynamic effects of levobupivacaine after pediatric caudal anesthesia evaluated by transesophageal doppler. Paediatr Anaesth. 2008 Nov;18(11):1066-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2008.02774.x. — View Citation

Larousse E, Asehnoune K, Dartayet B, Albaladejo P, Dubousset AM, Gauthier F, Benhamou D. The hemodynamic effects of pediatric caudal anesthesia assessed by esophageal Doppler. Anesth Analg. 2002 May;94(5):1165-8, table of contents. — View Citation

Mason KP, Lerman J. Review article: Dexmedetomidine in children: current knowledge and future applications. Anesth Analg. 2011 Nov;113(5):1129-42. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31822b8629. Epub 2011 Aug 4. Review. — View Citation

Xiang Q, Huang DY, Zhao YL, Wang GH, Liu YX, Zhong L, Luo T. Caudal dexmedetomidine combined with bupivacaine inhibit the response to hernial sac traction in children undergoing inguinal hernia repair. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Mar;110(3):420-4. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes385. Epub 2012 Nov 15. — View Citation

* Note: There are 15 references in allClick here to view all references

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Change in Cardiac output Cardiac output at 5 minutes, 10 minutes, 20 minutes and 30 minutes after caudal block,the cardiac output is measured with L/minute up to 30 minutes
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Not yet recruiting NCT02496299 - Effect of Dexamethasone Added To Bupivacaine During Caudal Block Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05981781 - Ultrasound Guided Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Versus Ultrasound Guided Caudal Block for Postoperative Pain in Paediatric Hip Surgery N/A
Completed NCT03261921 - Caudal Combination of Dexamethasone and/or Dexmedetomidine to Bupivacaine in Pediatric Hypospadias Surgery Phase 1
Recruiting NCT05922605 - Analgesic Effects of Caudal S-ketamine for Supplementation of Ropivacaine Caudal Analgesia in Children With Hypospadias Phase 4
Recruiting NCT06187714 - Effect of Caudal Block Injection Rate on Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in Pediatric Surgeries
Completed NCT04691531 - Decreasing the Invasiveness of Ultrasound Guided Caudal Block: A Comparison Between 22-gauge and 27-guage Needles N/A
Recruiting NCT05717374 - Methylprednisolone Versus Dexamethasone in Pediatric Caudal Block N/A
Completed NCT06235944 - Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Caudal Block in Penile Surgeries in Pediatrics N/A
Completed NCT05633173 - Effects of Erector Spinae Plane and Caudal Block on Postoperative Stress Response N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT04671992 - Out Of-plane Technique Against In-plane for Caudal Block N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05442905 - Quadratus Lumborum Versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Versus Caudal Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Pediatric Inguinal Hernia : Double-Blinded Randomized Trial N/A