Increasing Security With End-zone Arterial Blood Pressure Monitoring During Surgery

Catheterization, Peripheral Clinical Trial

Official title:

"Intraoperative Use of Distal Radial Artery Cannulation With Snuffbox Approach'

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT06033677
• Other study ID #: 114-24/06/2022
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: January 17, 2024
• Est. completion date: May 15, 2024

Study information

• Verified date: June 2024
• Source: Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Short summary: The aim of this randomized controlled clinical research study was to compare distal radial artery cannulation with forearm radial artery cannulation in terms of efficacy and ease of administration. The investigators believe that cannulation of the distal radial artery in cases requiring invasive arterial monitoring should preserve the radial artery of the forearm for future health problems and reduce circulatory complications by working more distally.

The main question[s] aims to answer are:

• [question 1]: whether artery monitoring can be performed with a more distal approach

• [question 2]: efficacy and safety of the distal approach

Description:

The distal radial artery (dRA) in the snuffbox location is a popular arterial access site for interventional cardiological procedures and neurointerventions. The investigators aimed to investigate the distal radial artery as an alternative site to the classical radial artery (RA) in cases requiring intraoperative arterial cannulation and blood pressure monitoring. The superficial location of the classic radial artery, its collateral blood flow with the ulnar artery, and limited complications make it a preferred choice for catheterization purposes. Given its use in various medical procedures such as flap transplantation, creating arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis, and bypass grafting, the investigators believe that preserving the classic radial artery is essential for potential health issues likely to arise in the future. In addition, the investigators aim to minimize circulatory complications by working more distally. Furthermore, it's worth mentioning that alterations in wrist positioning causing disruptions in the invasive arterial waveform also create a need for a different puncture approach. For all these conditions, the investigators believe that the snuffbox approach to distal radial artery cannulation would be an advantageous alternative.

This study will be a prospective randomized, controlled single-blind study. Patients who are scheduled for elective surgery, aged 18 and above, with ASA 1, 2, or 3 classifications, and requiring intraoperative arterial cannulation at Diyarbakır Gazi Yaşargil Training and Research Hospital will be included in the study. The exclusion criteria for participating in the study are as follows: under 18 years of age, ASA-4 classification, presence of non-palpable arteries, presence of burns or infection at the cannulation site, peripheral vascular disease, bleeding or coagulation disorders, negative modified Allen's test, and communication disorders. The withdrawal criteria for the study include a patient's desire to withdraw from the study at any stage and an extended cannulation time.

Participants will be divided into two groups, and ultrasound-guided cannulation will be performed for each group. One group will be cannulated through the classical radial artery of the forearm, while the other group will be cannulated through the distal radial artery using the snuffbox approach. Demographic data (age, gender, weight, height, BMI, comorbidity, medications, ASA, previous artery intervention, working position and working time), USG measurement data (diameter and depth of the artery) and procedural data (hand selection, first attempt success rate, arterial catheterization time, arterial posterior wall puncture rate, intraoperative artery waveform quality, postoperative compression time, and complications) will be recorded.

The sample size was determined by G-Power version 3.1.9.4, taking into account a two-tailed alpha error of 0.05, a power of 0.80, and an effect size of 0.5. Based on this savings and N2/N1 allocations of 0.98 in a previous study ( Distal radial artery as an alternative approach to forearm radial artery for perioperative blood pressure monitoring: a randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial Jingwei Xiong1 , Kangli Hui1 , Miaomiao Xu1 , Jiejie Zhou1 , Jie Zhang1 and Manlin Duan1,2* Xiong et al. BMC Anesthesiology (2022) 22:67 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01609-5 ), the minimum number required for the study was planned to be 52 patients in the dRA group and 50 patients in the RA group.

The intervention will be performed under USG guidance by a single anesthesiologist with at least 5 years of experience in arterial cannulation.

The anticipated study duration is 6 months, and once approved by your institution, the study will commence and will be concluded upon reaching the target number of participants.

SPSS 21.0 for Windows software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) will be conducted for statistical analysis of the data. When evaluating the data statistically, numerical data will be expressed as mean and standard deviation, while categorical data will be presented as frequency and percentage. The chi-square test and Fisher's Exact test will be used to compare categorical data between groups, and the results will be reported as percentages (%n). Non-categorical data's normal distribution will be assessed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. For normally distributed data, Student's t-test was used for statistical comparison between groups. For non-normally distributed data, the Mann-Whitney U test was employed. In all analyses, p-values less than 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 101
• Est. completion date: May 15, 2024
• Est. primary completion date: May 15, 2024
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Patients who are scheduled for elective surgery

• Aged 18 and above

• ASA 1, 2, or 3 classifications

• Requiring intraoperative arterial cannulation

• At TC SBÜ Diyarbakir Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital will be included in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

• Under 18 years of age

• ASA-4 classification

• Presence of non-palpable arteries

• Presence of burns or infection at the cannulation site

• Peripheral vascular disease, bleeding or coagulation disorders

• Negative modified Allen's test, and communication disorders. The withdrawal criteria for the study include a patient's desire to withdraw from the study at any stage and an extended cannulation time.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Catheterization, Peripheral

Intervention

Procedure:
• Distal radial artery cannulation
Interventional application for invasive blood pressure monitoring
• Forearm radial artery cannulation
Interventional application for invasive blood pressure monitoring

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Turkey	Health Sciences University Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital:	Diyarbakir

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Turkey, 

References & Publications (2)

Hamandi M, Saad M, Hasan R, Megaly M, Abbott JD, Dib C, Szerlip M, Potluri S, Lotfi A, Kiemeneij F, Al-Azizi KM. Distal Versus Conventional Transradial Artery Access for Coronary Angiography and Intervention: A Meta-Analysis. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020 Oct;21(10):1209-1213. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2020.03.020. Epub 2020 Mar 14. — View Citation

Hammami R, Zouari F, Ben Abdessalem MA, Sassi A, Ellouze T, Bahloul A, Mallek S, Triki F, Mahdhaoui A, Jeridi G, Abid L, Charfeddine S, Kammoun S, Jdidi J. Distal radial approach versus conventional radial approach: a comparative study of feasibility and — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Number of interventions performed with USG guidance	The number of attempts will be recorded as 1st attempt, 2nd attempt and 3rd and above attempts.	during cannulation procedure
Secondary	arterial catheterization time	Arterial catheterization time will be evaluated as under or over 3 minutes.	during cannulation procedure
Secondary	Monitored arterial waveform success	Monitored arterial waveform success will be evaluated as follows; successful (there is a wave); fail (no wave); intraoperative damping time (the time during which the arterial wave disappears while the operation continues)	During the intraoperative period
Secondary	Compression time after catheter removal	After the catheter is removed, the compression time will be measured in seconds. Bleeding will be checked every 30 seconds.	procedure (the process until the catheter is removed and the bleeding stops)
Secondary	complication follow-up	Developing complications (vasospasm, hematoma, color and temperature change in the finger); During the intraoperative period,; In the postoperative period; upon first arrival in the recovery room,; 1st hour at the end of the operation,; 6th hour at the end of the operation and; 24st at the end of the operation] will be recorded.	Complication follow-up will be done from the beginning of cannulation procedure to the 24th hour postoperatively.