Case Management Clinical Trial
Official title:
San Francisco Health Plan Care Support Intervention: A Randomized Trial
This study will expand and evaluate an existing pilot program to improve care for frequent users of acute emergency and inpatient services by providing care coordination and management for eligible San Francisco Health Plan members. SF Health Plan's Community-Based Care Management pilot program ("Program") known as "CareSupport" serves vulnerable SF Health Plan members who are high utilizers of hospital inpatient and emergency departments and at extremely high risk for mortality and morbidity due to factors such as housing instability, mental illness, and addiction. Care managers, called community coordinators, are trained bachelor-level social workers or outreach workers and each have a panel of 30-35 members who they directly engage in the community where the members tend to live or congregate (shelters, bus stops, coffee shops, community agencies, and by cell phone) to help them improve their health and navigate through the health care and social services systems. The number of San Francisco Health Plan members who would be eligible for Care Support services far outstrips the capacity the San Francisco Health Plan to provide these additional services, and the investigators will thus evaluate the intervention using a randomized trial design.
Purpose: The purpose of the CareSupport intervention is to coordinate often-fragmented care
for SFHP members with heavy use of acute health care services, reducing cost of care for the
San Francisco safety net (the San Francisco Department of Health and San Francisco General
Hospital) while increasing use of sustaining services including primary care.
The Program: The San Francisco Health Plan (SFHP) CareSupport program identifies
high-utilizing SFHP members with high risk for mortality and morbidity due to factors that
complicate underlying illness and care seeking patterns. These factors include housing
instability, behavioral health issues, and complex medical illness. This population's
medical, behavioral and social needs are not met by the existing delivery system, and while
many issues they face may not be traditionally perceived as health care, they do impact this
vulnerable population's health and care seeking patterns greatly.
CareSupport Community Coordinators each carry a caseload of 25-35 eligible members identified
based on health services use in the prior 12 months. Each team of 5 Coordinators is
supervised by a skilled master's level Social Worker. Community Coordinators outreach to
eligible patients and conduct detailed assessments in order to develop a Care Plan that is
then shared with other providers within and outside of SFHP. Community Coordinators provide
patient-centered, community-based advocacy and navigation across systems of care, to improve
coordination and unify health and treatment goals. The CareSupport program incorporates a
focus on prevention and early intervention within a continuum of quality health care that
includes disease management, advocacy, appointment reminders and accompaniment, home visits,
and regular communication with primary care and other providers. Community Coordinators are
accountable for coordinating and following through on all aspects of a member's needs, and
their duties are as variable as reminder calls, accompaniment to medical appointments,
assistance with housing placement, and help obtaining food and other services. Twice weekly
team meetings involve complex case reviews and program troubleshooting as well as mini
trainings led by social work supervisors. The staff is trained in trauma-informed care,
motivational interviewing, harm reduction, and other areas of relevance to the intervention
target population.
The investigators' composed of 3 groups of SFHP members, all of whom are heavy users of
health care services: 1) members with a minimum of 2 hospitalizations in the year before
enrollment 2) members with 5 ED visits and 1 hospitalization in the year before enrollment,
and 3) members with 6 or more ED visits in the year before enrollment in the investigators'
program.
The current CareSupport staff does not have the capacity to serve all SFHP members who are
eligible for CareSupport. The investigators propose to ethically allocate limited resources
and evaluate the impact of CareSupport using a randomly selected comparison group of
non-enrolled, CareSupport eligible SFHP members.
Randomization
Randomization process: First, eligible members will be rank ordered by descending age, then
based first on number of hospital admissions in the prior year, and finally by number of ED
visits in the prior year. SFHP members falling into the CareSupport target population based
on their utilization in the prior 12 months will be assigned using a standard "every other"
technique to either the CareSupport program (the intervention) or to the comparison group
that will not be offered enrollment. This technique will result in a "member pair," where one
member from the pair will be randomly assigned to the CareSupport intervention and one member
of the pair will be randomly assigned to the comparison group. For the purposes of the
evaluation, the member pair will share the same engagement date (see below).
The investigators will use an intention to treat framework: all SFHP members assigned to
CareSupport or the comparison group will remain in those groups for the analysis.
Outcomes and Evaluation Methods As mentioned above, SFHP has enrollment, demographic and
encounter/claims data for all SFHP members and these data will be used to conduct the
investigators' analysis. The investigators' primary outcomes can be tracked based on
administrative encounter data, and will include member services use across San Francisco
rather than being limited to a single hospital or small network of clinics.
A central goal of the investigators' evaluation is to determine whether the CareSupport
demonstration project generates more savings to the delivery system than it costs to
implement and sustain. The ability of the CareSupport program to succeed in this goal will
help determine whether it is sustainable and exportable to other sites. The investigators
anticipate that the CBCM model will produce cost-savings both by employing less expensive,
more appropriately-trained staff, as well as by connecting vulnerable members more
effectively to primary and preventive care, and social and behavioral resources, thereby
reducing their use of acute care.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT06162897 -
Case Management Dyad
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04961762 -
Navigator Program for Homeless Adults
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05642728 -
Impact of a PERsonalized CAse MAnagement Program for the Follow-up of Moderate and Severe aSTHma Patients on Exacerbations, Health Resource Use and Asthma Control: PERCASTHMA STUDY
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04366466 -
Program to Promote Engagement in Care for the Prevention of Recidivism
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05774106 -
The Therapeutic Relationship Between the Case Manager and the Person With Severe Mental Health Disorder
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06341348 -
Effects of Case Management for Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis in Taiwan
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03281447 -
Nurse Navigation Versus Current Care Coordination During Colorectal Cancer Trajectories
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04272918 -
Caregiver Support Model & Psycho-Education Program On Empowerment: Development and Validation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05223933 -
Proactive Community Case Management (Pro-CCM) in Rural Madagascar
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03446989 -
The Long-term Effectiveness of Case Management for Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis in Taiwan
|
N/A |