Cartilage Damage Clinical Trial
Official title:
The Influence of Hyaluronic Acid Injection Following Knee Arthroscopy
This is a prospective, double blind randomized controlled trial. In this study we will
investigate the influence of hyaluronic acid injection to knee after knee arthroscopy, when
known or discovered cartilage damage greater than International Cartilage Research Society
score (ICRS) grade 2 is found. The indication for arthroscopy is not necessarily the
cartilage damage. A set of 3 consecutive injections will be administered and follow up of
physical examination and questionaries will be done.
Our null hypothesis is that the administration of hyaluronic acid will show decrease pain
and quicker rehabilitation and return to normal activity in patients with grade 2 and higher
cartilage damage that had gone through knee arthroscopy.
Status | Not yet recruiting |
Enrollment | 60 |
Est. completion date | April 2018 |
Est. primary completion date | February 2018 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - 18 years old - signing a concent form - Assigned for knee arthroscopy. - Known chondral lesion of at least ICRS grade 2 in one or mor of the knee compartments per MRI prior to knee arthroscopy. - Cartilage lesion of at least ICRS grade 2 in one or mor of the knee compartments that was found during the knee arthroscopy. Exclusion Criteria: - Rheumatic disease - Synovial disease such as (but not limited to) Pigmented ViloNodular synovitis (PVNS) - Infection of the operated knee - new or previous - Pregnant women. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
n/a |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Ziv Medical Center |
Altman RD, Rosen JE, Bloch DA, Hatoum HT, Korner P. A double-blind, randomized, saline-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of EUFLEXXA for treatment of painful osteoarthritis of the knee, with an open-label safety extension (the FLEXX trial). Semi — View Citation
Kirchner M, Marshall D. A double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing alternate forms of high molecular weight hyaluronan for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2006 Feb;14(2):154-62. — View Citation
Leighton R, Akermark C, Therrien R, Richardson JB, Andersson M, Todman MG, Arden NK; DUROLANE Study Group.. NASHA hyaluronic acid vs. methylprednisolone for knee osteoarthritis: a prospective, multi-centre, randomized, non-inferiority trial. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2014 Jan;22(1):17-25. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.10.009. — View Citation
Thein R, Haviv B, Kidron A, Bronak S. Intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid following arthroscopic partial meniscectomy of the knee. Orthopedics. 2010 Oct 11;33(10):724. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20100826-11. — View Citation
Witteveen AG, Sierevelt IN, Blankevoort L, Kerkhoffs GM, van Dijk CN. Intra-articular sodium hyaluronate injections in the osteoarthritic ankle joint: effects, safety and dose dependency. Foot Ankle Surg. 2010 Dec;16(4):159-63. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2009.10.003. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Pain reduction | The treatment group will show lower scores than control group at all checkpoints- 2 weeks post operatively, 6 weeks post operatively, 3 months post operatively and 6 months post operatively. Evaluated using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain | up to 6 month | |
Primary | Change in the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score as a measure of Return to normal activity | The treatment group will show quicker return to normal activity that control group at all checkpoints - 2 weeks post operatively, 6 weeks post operatively, 3 months post operatively and 6 months post operatively. Evaluation is using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score | up to 6 month | |
Primary | Change in the knee circumference as a measure for Knee swelling | The treatment group will show less episodes of knee swelling than the control group at all checkpoints - 2 weeks post operatively, 6 weeks post operatively, 3 months post operatively and 6 months post operatively. Will be evaluated by measuring the knee circumference using a simple measuring tape in centimeters. | up to 6 month | |
Primary | Change in "Tegner-Lysholm" score as a measure of better function | The treatment group will show better scores in all functional questionnaires than the control group at all checkpoints - 2 weeks post operatively, 6 weeks post operatively, 3 months post operatively and 6 months post operatively.The questionnaires that will be used is "Tegner - Lysholm" score | up to 6 month | |
Primary | Change in the Short Form (SF) 12 score as a measure of return to normal activity | The treatment group will show quicker return to normal activity that control group at all checkpoints - 2 weeks post operatively, 6 weeks post operatively, 3 months post operatively and 6 months post operatively. Evaluation is using Short Form (SF)-12 score. | up to 6 months | |
Primary | Subjective description of return to normal activity as described by patients | The treatment group will show quicker return to normal activity that control group at all checkpoints - 2 weeks post operatively, 6 weeks post operatively, 3 months post operatively and 6 months post operatively. Evaluation is subjective by patients description. | up to 6 months | |
Primary | Change in the "Tegner-Lysholm" score as a measure of return to normal activity | The treatment group will show quicker return to normal activity that control group at all checkpoints - 2 weeks post operatively, 6 weeks post operatively, 3 months post operatively and 6 months post operatively. Evaluation is subjective by using "Tegner - Lysholm" score | up to 6 months | |
Primary | Subjective change in knee swelling | The treatment group will show less episodes of knee swelling than the control group at all checkpoints - 2 weeks post operatively, 6 weeks post operatively, 3 months post operatively and 6 months post operatively. Will be evaluated subjectively by the patients description. | up to 6 months | |
Primary | Change in Short Form(SF) 12 score as a measure of better function | The treatment group will show better scores in all functional questionnaires than the control group at all checkpoints - 2 weeks post operatively, 6 weeks post operatively, 3 months post operatively and 6 months post operatively.The questionnaires that will be used is Short-Form (SF)12 score | up to 6 months | |
Primary | Change in the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score as a measure of better function | The treatment group will show better scores in all functional questionnaires than the control group at all checkpoints - 2 weeks post operatively, 6 weeks post operatively, 3 months post operatively and 6 months post operatively.The questionnaires that will be used is International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score | up to 6 months |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT03755388 -
Clinical Trial of an MRI Based Patient Specific Focal Knee Resurfacing Implant
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04716140 -
Prospective Study: The Effect on Clinical Outcome After Treatment of MTP Cartilage Lesions in Hallux Valgus Surgery
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06185036 -
Histological Validation of dGEMRIC Indices as a Quantitative Biomarker for Cartilage Damage in the Hip Joint
|
||
Completed |
NCT04889443 -
Spontaneous Healing of ARticular Cartilage (SHARC)
|
||
Completed |
NCT04118023 -
7T MRI to Evaluate Cartilage Defects in the Knee
|
||
Completed |
NCT01473199 -
BioPoly RS Knee Registry Study for Cartilage Defect Replacement
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT05082831 -
Human ECM Implanted Within Microfracture Interstices & the Cartilage Defect in the Knee to Regenerate Hyaline Cartilage
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05124613 -
The Impact of Covid-19 on Patients Waiting for Knee Surgery
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05660161 -
This is a Study to Evaluate Nanofractures Technique in the Treatment of Cartilage Lesions
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03873545 -
Prospective Evaluation of ProChondrix CR for Repair of Articular Cartilage Defects on Femoral Condyle and Patella
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04785092 -
All Autologous Cartilage Regeneration in the Treatment of the Knee Cartilage Defects
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05328674 -
Clinical and Comparative Evaluation of the Treatment Results of Arthroscopic Reconstruction of Cartilage Defects in the Knee Joint With the Use of Autogenous Cartilage Graft With PRP GF (Platelet-rich Plasma With Growth Factors)
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02776943 -
UCMSC Transplantation in the Treatment of Cartilage Damage
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04236739 -
Comparing Clinical Outcomes of the One-step Cartilage Transplantation in Cartilage Defects of the Knee With Conservative Treatment
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02189408 -
Clinical Study of Pain Reduction by Peri-arthroscopic PRP Application in Knee Degeneration
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04626999 -
Single and Double Bundle ACL Reconstructions, in Term of Cartilage Damage Due to Remaining Instability After Surgery.
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT04301258 -
ProChondrix® CR Articular Cartilage Restoration Evaluation (PACE) Registry
|
||
Withdrawn |
NCT04875767 -
Cartilage Repair Using a Hyaluronic Acid-Based Scaffold With Bone Marrow Aspirate Compared With Microfracture for Focal Articular Cartilage Damage of the Hip
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05186935 -
Advanced Cartilage Treatment With Injectable-hydrogel Validation of the Effect
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT04212650 -
Losartan to Improve Hip Microfracture
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 |