Comparative Study of Two Incision vs. Mini Open Carpal Tunnel Release

Status Terminated

Clinical Trial Summary

Hand surgeons have many options to perform carpal tunnel release surgery. Some surgeons believe that techniques are best kept simple: a mini-open incision that allows adequate exposure of the transverse carpal ligament (TCL), while staying distal to the distal wrist crease will offer good outcomes. Others feel that as a minimally invasive technique, it is integral to spare the soft tissue structures superficial to the TCL. This study aims to determine whether sparing these superficial structures indeed improves patient outcomes, compared to a conventional two incision approach.

Clinical Trial Description

Carpal tunnel release (CTR) is a common surgery done by hand surgeons. The aim of the procedure is to decompress the median nerve at the level of the wrist and alleviate patient symptoms that include numbness, pain and tingling sensations along the median nerve distribution. Many versions of the technique have been described, with each description claiming improvement of post-operative results and decreasing complications. The first description of carpal tunnel release is believed to be that of Learmonth in 1933 where he describes incising the transverse carpal ligament in a lady with a wrist fracture1. Since then, the understanding towards carpal tunnel syndrome has markedly improved, and various surgical techniques have been developed. Because carpal tunnel syndrome has become such a common condition among the population, much knowledge has been gained about carpal tunnel surgery as well. One of the easily avoided complications of the procedure is scar related morbidity and pillar pain. Bromley offered a mini-palm open carpal tunnel release technique that decompressed the median nerve while keeping the entirety of the incision distal to the wrist crease. Tsai et al and Wilson also offered two-incision open carpal tunnel release techniques in order to keep incisions small but ensure complete release both proximally and distally. Endoscopic techniques were also eventually developed with the aim of a complete release while avoiding scar related complications. With the many options surgeons have on how to decompress the median nerve, some begin to question if techniques are being made unnecessarily complicated. Some believe that techniques are best kept simple: a mini-open incision that allows adequate exposure of the transverse carpal ligament (TCL), while staying distal to the distal wrist crease will offer good outcomes. Others feel that as a minimally invasive technique, it is integral to spare the soft tissue structures superficial to the TCL. This study aims to determine whether sparing these superficial structures indeed improves patient outcomes. Hypothesis: Null hypothesis: There is no difference in post-operative outcomes between a mini-open carpal tunnel release and a two incision carpal tunnel release Alternative hypothesis: A two-incision carpal tunnel release will yield improvement in post operative outcomes compared to that of the mini-open carpal tunnel release Aim of the Study: This study aims to determine whether sparing of the soft tissue structures superficial to the transverse carpal ligament will improve post-operative outcomes of patients undergoing carpal tunnel surgery. ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT05325567
Study type	Interventional
Source	University of Louisville
Contact
Status	Terminated
Phase	N/A
Start date	June 15, 2022
Completion date	January 3, 2023

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Completed	`NCT05067205` - Minimal Invasive Carpal Tunnel Release With the Novel Device	N/A
Completed	`NCT03184688` - Platelet Rich Plasma for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome	N/A
Completed	`NCT03582735` - Preoperative Neuromobilization Exercises for Individuals With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome	N/A
Completed	`NCT05490420` - Effects of Upper Extremity Manual Lymphatic Drainage on Symptom Severity, Hand Functions, Electrophysiological and Ultrasonographic Measurements in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05970692` - Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of the Turkish Version of Atroshi-Lyrén 6-item Symptoms Scale
Completed	`NCT04043780` - Clinical Validation of a Decompression Prototype Splint for Patients With Carpal Tunel Syndrome	N/A
Completed	`NCT03880812` - Cost Information on Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Treatment Decisions	N/A
Completed	`NCT06464809` - Treatment Intervention of Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS)	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05372393` - Carpal Tunnel Release Under Local Anaesthesia With or Without Distal Median Nerve Block	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05328180` - aDjunct bicarbonatE in Local anaesthesIa for CarpAl Tunnel rElease (DELICATE)	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05503719` - An Absorbable Suture Versus a Non-absorbable Suture in Carpal Tunnel Release, a Randomized Controlled Trial	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05466162` - Soft Tissue Massage Along With Mobilization Technique on Symptoms and Functional Status of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome	N/A
Completed	`NCT04060875` - Research Protocol for Karuna Labs Inc.: Safety and Efficacy of Virtual Reality Graded Motor Imagery for Chronic Pain
Not yet recruiting	`NCT06294821` - 4AP to Delay Carpal Tunnel Release (CTR)	Phase 2/Phase 3
Not yet recruiting	`NCT04328805` - Pain Reduction and Changes in Upper Limb Function Produced by an Ibuprofen Treatment in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.	Phase 4
Terminated	`NCT02791529` - Scalpel Versus Electrocautery for Surgical Skin Incision in Open Carpal Tunnel Release	Phase 1
Completed	`NCT02141035` - Acetyl-l-carnitine to Enhance Nerve Regeneration in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome	Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed	`NCT01887145` - Comparison of Long-term Outcomes Following Endoscopic or Open Surgery for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT01897272` - Post-Operative Splinting After Short-Incision Carpal Tunnel Release: a Prospective Study	N/A
Completed	`NCT01394822` - Neuromuscular Ultrasound for Focal Neuropathies	N/A