Clinical Trials Logo

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT03567109 Completed - Clinical trials for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Body Schema Alterations in Musculoskeletal Disorders : Effect of Laterality

Schem-TMS
Start date: July 13, 2018
Phase:
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

This study assess ocular movements in a hand laterality judgment task in a population of musculoskeletal disorders. Reaction time, error rate and visual strategy are compared between musculoskeletal disorders and healthy patients, and between the different locations of the disorder.

NCT ID: NCT03548259 Completed - Clinical trials for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Effects of Platelet-rich Plasma in the Surgery of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial

PRP-CTS
Start date: June 5, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been proved to be efficient in the non-surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Here we propose to assess the effectiveness of PRP as co-adjuvant in surgical treatment of CTS by open carpal tunnel release. Design: Randomized Controlled Trial. Setting: Local Hospital.

NCT ID: NCT03532373 Completed - Clinical trials for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Testing of a Tool to Elicit Patient Preferences for CTS

Start date: March 1, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study will complete a randomized controlled trial to quantitatively measure patient decisional conflict (Decisional Conflict Scale) in 150 patients treated for CTS with the tool compared to 150 patients treated with standard care. The investigators hypothesize patients treated for CTS will have lower decisional conflict with the tool.

NCT ID: NCT03499158 Completed - Clinical trials for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Terminal Latency Index, Residual Latency and Median Ulnar F Latency Difference in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Start date: January 1, 2016
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Terminal latency index, residual latency and median ulnar F latency difference in carpal tunnel syndrome are specific parameters for the diagnosis

NCT ID: NCT03498287 Completed - Clinical trials for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Non-invasive CTS Device Clinical Trial

Start date: October 10, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Sham-controlled, multi-center and remote patient-centered randomized controlled clinical trial to investigate the efficacy of a novel non-invasive, unobtrusive study device in reducing symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Daily wear of the study device is expected to significantly reduce symptom severity (evaluated by the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire) in mild to severe CTS-diagnosed patients. Subjects are randomized into the active device group or sham group for 8 weeks, then followed for 12 weeks post-treatment.

NCT ID: NCT03495466 Completed - Clinical trials for Bilateral Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (Diagnosis)

Comparison of Local Only Anesthesia Versus Sedation in Patients Undergoing Bilateral Carpal Tunnel Release

Start date: February 4, 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The study design is a prospective randomized control trial. Four surgeons will enroll up to 30 patients in the study. Patients will be asked to participate if they plan to undergo bilateral carpal tunnel release with one of the study surgeons, are greater than 18 years of age but younger than 89, have had no prior carpal tunnel surgery, and agree to undergo carpal tunnel surgery under two different types of anesthesia. If patients meet these criteria and agree to participate in the study, they will be consenting to have one hand operated on with local only anesthesia and the other hand with local anesthesia with sedation. The patient will randomly be assigned to have one of the two anesthetic methods for the first carpal tunnel release, followed by the other anesthetic for the second carpal tunnel release. The two surgeries will be completed by the same surgeon and may be performed at any time interval apart; however, the investigators will recommend that patients get the second surgery within 4 weeks of the first. The particular surgical technique of carpal tunnel release will be performed according to the individual surgeon's preference, but the same technique will be used on both wrists. The surgeon will discuss the proposed advantages and disadvantages of each anesthetic method prior to enrolling the patient (advantages and disadvantages discussed above). The treating surgeons will continue to utilize their standard surgical technique on each side, regardless of a patient's participation in the study.

NCT ID: NCT03476486 Completed - Clinical trials for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

A Pilot Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Ultrasound Guided Looped Thread Carpal Tunnel Release

Start date: May 20, 2016
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

Carpal tunnel syndrome occurs when a nerve gets pinched as it passes through a confined tunnel within the wrist and hand. It is the most commonly pinched nerve and often results in disabling hand numbness, tingling, pain and weakness. For moderate and severe cases, an operation is often performed that cuts the ligament that presses on the nerve. This surgery is generally very successful but involves a 2-5 cm long incision at the base of the palm. Recovery from the surgery usually takes 3-8 weeks. Ultrasound provides a clear noninvasive way of looking at the contents of the carpal tunnel. A technique has been developed whereby a wire thread is looped around the ligament using a needle guided by ultrasound. The ligament is cut by the wire below the surface of the skin. This technique results in 2 needle puncture holes instead of the open incision of the traditional surgery. The investigators have completed research on this technique in cadavers. It was confirmed that complete or almost complete cutting of the ligament can be safely and predictably accomplished. This research will look at the effectiveness of this looped thread technique of carpal tunnel release on patients who have carpal tunnel syndrome. Specifically, participants will be required to: 1. rate the severity of their carpal tunnel syndrome symptoms and disability using a standard questionnaire, 2. measure hand sensation, 3. measure pinch and grip strength tests of their hands, 4. undergo ultrasound measurements of the size of the pinched nerve at the carpal tunnel, and 5. undergo electrical tests to measure the nerves ability to conduct impulses across the carpal tunnel. These will be measured before the looped wire procedure and at 3 and 6 months following the procedure. Recovery time will also be measured.

NCT ID: NCT03432858 Completed - Clinical trials for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Preoperative Antibiotics for Carpal Tunnel Release Surgery

Start date: May 17, 2018
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

This is a clinical trial to determine how effective antibiotics administered prior to endoscopic carpal tunnel release surgery are in preventing surgical site infections.

NCT ID: NCT03427983 Completed - Clinical trials for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Hydrodissection as a Treatment for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Start date: March 8, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This is a pilot study designed to acquire data on the added value of hydrodissection when using a corticosteroid injection as a treatment for patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Hydrodissection is part of a standard clinical care injection under ultrasound guidance in which the fluid is used to separate the nerve from surrounding structures.

NCT ID: NCT03411551 Completed - Clinical trials for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Ultrasound-guided Peripheral Nerve Block Versus Forearm Bier's Block in Patients Undergoing Carpal Tunnel Release

Start date: January 17, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

By means of an observer-blinded, randomized controlled trial, the analgesic efficacy of the forearm intravenous regional anesthesia and the ultrasound guided peripheral nerve block will be investigated in patients undergoing carpal tunnel release. The hypothesis is that the ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve block is superior compared to the forearm intravenous regional anesthesia with respect to the analgesic efficacy. Furthermore, pre-, intra-, and post-operative pain will be investigated at several time points as well as general patient satisfaction and satisfaction of the surgeon regarding the procedures.