View clinical trials related to Carotid Arteries.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to investigate the ability of a new investigational agent compound [F-18] labeled RGD-K5 to detect unstable atherosclerotic plaque in the carotid artery of subjects being considered for carotid endarterectomy (CEA), and to confirm this ability through tissue analysis of samples of carotid artery plaques that will be collected during the planned carotid surgery. [F-18] RGD-K5 is a radioactive tracer used in imaging to detect active growth of new blood vessels and presence of macrophages. Patients with unstable plaque may be prone to rupture of the plaque due to increase in macrophage activity and growth of new blood vessels. [F-18] RGD-K5 is an investigational agent, which means that it has not yet been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Unstable atherosclerotic plaque that is prone to rupture is characterized by an increase in the number of macrophages and enhanced angiogenesis. Both neovascular endothelium and macrophages exhibit increased Alpha-v beta3 integrin expression. PET (Positron Emission Tomography) imaging of [F-18] RGD-K5 uptake may identify carotid plaque with increased inflammation and neovascularization and may therefore detect unstable plaque in participants with carotid artery stenosis. Prior to Dr. Tamarappoo's relocation to Cedars Sinai Medical Center (CSMC), 5 subjects were enrolled at the Cleveland Clinic where PET-CT (Positron Emission Tomography - Computed Tomography) was performed. 6 subjects will be scanned at Cedars using PET-MRI (Positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance imaging). Based on preliminary data with PET-CTA, the investigator strongly believes the study will be able to reproducibly detect significant [F-18] RGD-K5 uptake in plaque from symptomatic patients. Ultimately, demonstrating preferential [F-18] RGD-K5 uptake in symptomatic patients will significantly impact the way in which patients with carotid plaque (at risk for stroke) are treated and it may prevent unnecessary surgical and endovascular procedures in this population
A recent randomized Carotid artery stenting (CAS) trial in which carotid protection device (CPD)s were used to demonstrate equivalence with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) by achieving noninferiority regarding periprocedural risk. However, the clinical efficacy and safety of CPDs are still a matter of controversy. It has been argued that the limited reduction provided by CPDs may be due to the devices themselves. Probably, they serve as sources for emboli during the procedure or removal technique. In general, 30- day adverse outcome for CAS with the use of CPDs seems not to be different from the outcome without CPDs. Thus, the main goal in this study is to test the hypothesis that CAS without CPD usage is as safe as in those patients who undergo CAS with CPD neuroprotection.