Pre-Pilot: Problem Adaptation THerapy in Caregivers

Caregiver Burden Clinical Trial

— PATH-Care  

Official title:

Pre-Pilot: Adapting and Testing an Evidence-Based Emotion Regulation Therapy for Use by Caregivers of Individuals With Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD)

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05567120
• Other study ID #: 21-12024235
• Secondary ID: 22-08-535-380
• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: September 2024
• Est. completion date: December 2025

Study information

• Verified date: March 2024
• Source: Weill Medical College of Cornell University
• Contact: Cary Reid, MD PhD
• Phone: 212-746-1378
• Email: mcr2004[@]med.cornell.edu
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The proposed pre-pilot project seeks to adapt an evidence-based psychosocial intervention-Pain Adaptation Therapy (PATH)-that employs emotion regulation, behavioral activation, and problem-solving skills training, that will be augmented with a caregiver (CG) education component, for use by CGs of individuals with Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD).

Description:

The study team will conduct an uncontrolled pre-pilot test of an adapted PATH-Care intervention with family CGs of persons with ADRD (target N=15). Following the informed consent process, screening, and enrollment, participants will complete a baseline assessment, 8 PATH-Care sessions with short feedback interviews, tablet-based exercises, and a post-intervention assessment. Primary Objective(s): To adapt the existing PATH intervention as a tool to mitigate negative emotions and stress experienced by informal CGs of individuals with ADRD, by employing an evidence-based user-center design protocol and obtaining additional suggestions for program refinement through an uncontrolled usability study.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Enrollment: 15
• Est. completion date: December 2025
• Est. primary completion date: December 2025
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Age = 18
• English speaking
• Informal caregiver of an individual with ADRD diagnosis
• Lives with or near the care recipient
• Provides at least 10 hours of care per week to a person with ADRD
• Has provided care to a person with ADRD for 6 months or more, prior to enrollment
• Cognitively intact (Score of = 26 on adjusted MoCA-Blind)
• Score of = 12 on the Negative Affect Scale of Positive and Negative Affect Schedule OR at least one significant negative emotion (score of = 3)

Exclusion Criteria:

• Age = 18
• Non-English speaking
• Paid caregiver
• Care recipient does not have ADRD diagnosis
• Provides care for less than 10 hours per week
• Has provided care for less than 6 months, prior to enrollment
• Care recipient is currently enrolled in hospice
• Meets criteria for severe Major Depression (Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale = 30) that may require hospitalization
• Significant Cognitive impairment (Score of < 26 on adjusted MoCA-Blind)
• Score of < 12 on the Negative Affect Scale of Positive and Negative Affect Schedule or no significant negative emotion

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Caregiver Burden

Intervention

Other:
• PATH-Care
Individuals will receive the 8-session PATH-Care intervention, delivered virtually (via videoconference or phone) to mitigate negative emotions and stress experienced by informal caregivers of individuals with ADRD. The therapist in the first session will also guide the participant in the tablet-based exercises (WELLPath).

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	NewYork-Presbyterian - Weill Cornell Medicine	New York	New York

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Weill Medical College of Cornell University	Cornell University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Change in Positive and Negative Affect as Measured by the Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS)	The 20-item self-report Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS-GEN) asks participants to describe to what extent they feel different feelings and emotions on average. Respondents answer on a five-point scale: 1=Very slightly or not at all, 2=A little, 3=Moderately, 4=Quite a bit, 5=Extremely. There are different subscales within this measure with 10 questions measuring positive affect, and 10 measuring negative affect. These have scores ranging from 10-50 with a higher score indicating higher positive affect, and a lower score indicating lower negative affect respectively.	At baseline; at week 10 (post-intervention)
Primary	Change in depression as measured by Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS-S)	The 9-item self-report Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale asks participants about items like sadness, inner tension, sleep, and concentration. Respondents answer on a 7-point scale loosely by: 0=Normal, 2=Slight reduction, 4=Moderate reduction, and 6=Completely unable. These responses are personalized to the question a little more specifically. Scores range from 0-54 with a higher score indicating higher depression.	At baseline; at week 10 (post-intervention)
Primary	Change in caregiver burden as measured by Zarit Burden Interveiw (ZBI-12)	The 12-item self-report Zarit Burden Interview Scale asks participants "do you feel...?" with responses about caregiver burden like anger, stress, and social life. Respondents answer on a 5-point scale: 0= Never, 1=Rarely, 2=Sometimes, 3=Quite Frequently, 4=Nearly Always. Scores range from 0-48 with a higher score indicating higher burden.	At baseline; at week 10 (post-intervention)
Secondary	Change in efficacy and preparedness as measured by the Preparedness Caregiving Scale (PCS)	This 8-item likert questions with 1 open-ended question measures efficacy and preparedness for caregiving. Respondents answer the likert questions on a 5-point scale: 0=not at all prepared, 1=not too well prepared, 2=somewhat well prepared, 3=pretty well prepared, and 4=very well prepared. The mean score is calculated with these 8 questions and a higher score indicates higher preparedness. The open-ended question asks, "Is there anything specific you would like to be better prepared for?"	At baseline; at week 10 (post-intervention)
Secondary	Change in emotion regulatory ability as measured by the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ)	The 10-item self-report Emotion Regulation Questionnaire measures cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression measured separately. Respondents answer on a seven-point scale: 1=strongly disagree, 4=neutral, and 7=strongly agree. The six cognitive reappraisal questions are calculated with a mean score and a higher score indicated higher cognitive reappraisal. The four expressive suppression questions are calculated with a mean score and a higher score indicates higher expressive suppression.	At baseline; at week 10 (post-intervention)
Secondary	Change in positive aspects of caregiving as measured by the Positive Aspects of Caregiving scale (PAC)	The 9-item self-report scale measures positive aspects of caregiving. Respondents answer on a 5-point scale: 1=disagree a lot, 2=disagree a little, 3=neither agree or disagree, 4=agree a little, and 5=agree a lot. The questions are summed with a range of 9-45 with a higher score indicating more positive caregiving experiences.	At baseline; at week 10 (post-intervention)
Secondary	Feasibility, Acceptability, and Usability of PATH-Care intervention	Feasibility, acceptability, and usability will be measured by 6 open-ended questions during the post-intervention assessment. Questions include "What were your overall impressions of the therapy?," "What would you change about the therapy?," and "Would you recommend this treatment to people who are caregivers like yourself?"	At week 10 (post-intervention)
Secondary	Satisfaction as measured by Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-3)	This 3-item Client Satisfaction Questionnaire measures the self-reported satisfaction of the intervention. Respondents report levels of satisfaction on a 4-point scale with 4 having "almost all of my needs have been met" "very satisfied" and "yes, definitely" and 1 having "none of my needs have been met", "quite dissatisfied", and "no, definitely not". Scores range from 3-12 with a higher score indicating higher satisfaction.	At week 10 (post-intervention)
Secondary	Usable intervention as measured by the System Usability Scale	This 10-item adapted measure of the System Usability Scale will measure usability of the intervention. Respondents rank each question from 1 to 5 based on how much they agree with the statement with 5 being "strongly agree" and 1 being "strongly disagree". Scores are converted to a 100-point scale with a higher score indicating higher usability.	At week 10 (post-intervention)