Cardiovascular Health Clinical Trial
Official title:
Boston Puerto Rican Health Study - Project 4
The study is a blinded cross over test of in-home air filtration. Participants will have a window unit air filter (HEPA) installed that will filter for 3 weeks and do sham filtration for another 3 weeks. During the time that the filter is installed in the home a machine that measures particulate air pollution of the type that the filter is designed to remove will be installed. A survey will be administered, blood samples taken and blood pressure measured immediately prior to starting the filter, at 3 weeks when the filtration is changed from sham to real filtration or visa versa and at the end of the second three week period. All participants will be recruited from the Boston Puerto Rican Health Study cohort.
Project 4 Protocol:
I. Aims and Hypotheses
H1: That in-home active HEPA filtration will reduce ultrafine particle (UFP) levels >70%
compared to sham filtration. Further, that HEPA filtration will reduce all size classes of
ultrafine particles equally well.
H2: That markers of cardiovascular health, including C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, IL-6
and tumor necrosis factor alpha receptor, will be lower after living with active HEPA
filtration compared to sham filtration.
H3: In-home HEPA filtration will be seen by policy-makers as an effective policy option for
reducing UFP exposure in near-highway residences.
The study was a double-blind, randomized crossover trial in which each participant served as
their own control, thereby greatly reducing the role of time-invariable confounders. Up to
two homes were enrolled and randomized at a time, with one allocated to receive HEPA
filtration and the other sham filtration first. At three weeks, the homes were switched from
HEPA filtration to sham or vice versa. There was no washout period between sham and HEPA
filtration. While field staff were aware of the type of filter in use, the participants and
the lab that analyzed blood samples were not. The approach and methods were largely similar
to another HEPA intervention we conducted in public housing in the City of Somerville, which
was still in progress at the start of this study.
Participants were recruited from the BPRHS cohort. The parent study was in the process of
follow-up at approximately five years since baseline with close to 1000 participants
remaining. The cohort staff recommended non-smoking participants who they thought might be
receptive to our intervention. Of the 25 participants enrolled, 23 (92%) completed the study
and were included in the analysis. One home was removed due to the failure of the flow
sensor, which identified indoor versus outdoor air, while the other was removed because the
participant opted to end the study early. All participants lived in the cities of Boston or
Chelsea. Data on demographics and health were obtained from surveys collected during
longitudinal follow-up of the cohort. For the participants receiving the intervention, the
investigators collected additional surveys with information on recent exposures, recent
illnesses, and participant time-activity patterns (at home, work/school, travel on highways,
other).
Participants signed consent forms for the parent study and a separate consent for the air
filtration intervention. The studies were approved by the IRBs at Tufts Medical Center,
Northeastern University, and the University of Massachusetts Lowell.
The intervention Window-mounted HEPAirX air filtration units (Air Innovations, Inc., North
Syracuse, NY, USA) equipped with MERV 17 filters (rated to remove ≥99.97% of particles ≥0.3
μm in diameter) were used. These units can operate at ~10 exchanges/hour in a 28.3 m3 (103
ft3) room and have user-controlled air heating and cooling elements. The units were
installed preferentially in living rooms of apartments (N=16), where participants spent much
of their day. Eight units were installed in bedrooms due to space restrictions or because
living room windows did not accommodate the HEPAirX unit. To maximize particle removal, the
HEPA units were operated at the highest possible fan speed and the vents were blocked so
that there was no flow of outdoor air through the unit into the apartment. Also,
participants were asked to keep windows closed as much as possible during the study period
to minimize infiltration from outside. Filters were changed in each apartment after 21 days
(HEPA for sham or vice versa). A new HEPA filter (MERV 17) was used in each apartment. The
sham filter was an empty, perforated sheet metal box that was the same size and shape and
had the same appearance as the metal frame around the HEPA filters. The HEPAirX sounded the
same regardless of sham or HEPA filtration. A sign written in English and Spanish was placed
on the HEPA-unit cover asking participants not to tamper with or expose the filter.
Air pollution monitoring Particle number concentrations (PNC) were measured continuously
during the six-week trial in each apartment using water-based condensation particle counters
(CPC; TSI Model 3783, d50 7 nm, maximum detectable particle >3 µm). The CPCs were installed
in the same room as the HEPAirX unit and recorded 30-second mean PNC (one-minute mean PNC in
the first five homes). Both outdoor and indoor PNC were measured; a solenoid valve switched
every 15 minutes between two, 1-m-long conductive silicon inlet tubes: one pulled from
indoors and the other pulled from outdoors. An in-line flow sensor logged different voltages
depending on whether a flow was detected in the line (2.49 V with flow, ~1.00 V with no
flow); these were used to identify indoor and outdoor sampling periods. Before the start of
the intervention in each apartment, CPC flow rates were measured using a flow meter (TSI
Model 4140) (no discrepancies were observed throughout the study). The CPC vacuum was also
checked for leaks by placing a polyethersulfone membrane filter (rated at 99.96% removal
efficiency for 0.45 µm particles) on the inlet to insure the CPC measured <100
particles/cm3. Sites were visited weekly for regular maintenance (flow checks, time resets,
etc.) and to download data. Data flagged by the CPC as erroneous (typically <1% of all data
per home) were removed from the data set. Consistent with manufacturer specifications, all
CPCs performed within 10% of one another in laboratory side-by-side comparisons.
The Somerville study, which the investigators combined with the current study in a
meta-analysis, followed the same study design and methods with the following differences: 1)
there was no outdoor monitoring; 2) all study participants resided within 200 m of a
highway; and 3) the study participants differed in their demographics.
Indoor sources Indoor measurements reflect both the fraction of outdoor UFP that infiltrate
indoors and indoor-generated UFP - e.g., from cooking, candle and incense burning, and
cleaning. These sources result in large but variable magnitude spikes in indoor
concentrations and further, the rate of decay of these spikes depends on several factors,
such as source strength and duration, room volume and ventilation rate. It is thus
challenging to completely separate the contributions from outdoor and indoor UFP sources
based on indoor PNC measurements. Nonetheless, to test effects of indoor spikes on
associations with biomarkers, the investigators generated a PNC time-series for each home
and calculated the six-hour moving median for indoor PNC measurements. The investigators
then calculated the standard deviation for the three-week period corresponding to HEPA or
sham filtration; indoor measurements that were two standard deviations above this six-hour
moving median were classified as spikes and replaced with the last indoor measurement that
was not considered to be a spiked value. Even though the investigators' method did not
completely remove the contribution from indoor sources, it attenuated the contributions from
spikes that skewed the three-week indoor average values used as exposure concentrations.
Biomarkers A venous blood sample was collected at the start, at the change of filter types
(end of week 3) and at end of the intervention (end of week 6). Samples were transported to
the Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging (Tufts University, Boston campus), where they
were processed to plasma and stored at minus 80 ºC within 1-3 h of collection. Participants
were instructed to fast overnight prior to the blood draws (79% confirming fasting), which
occurred between 8 and 10 AM. Samples were assayed in batches using immunoassay kits for
TNF-RII (Quantitative, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and IL-6 (Quantitative HS, R&D
Systems). High sensitivity CRP (hsCRP) was measured by a solid-phase, two-site
chemiluminescent immunometric assay, (IMMULITE 2000, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Los
Angeles, CA 90045). These biomarkers are a measure of the levels of systemic inflammation.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT05986058 -
Preliminary Efficacy of a Technology-based Physical Activity Intervention for Older Korean Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01235390 -
Effects of the Consumption of California Walnuts on Cardiovascular Health
|
Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04811885 -
The Effects of Covid-19 Pandemic on the Cardiovascular Heath of Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05122689 -
Dietary Inorganic Nitrate and the Enteral Microbiome
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03119792 -
Salud Integral Colombia
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01767051 -
Children Follow-up of PCOS Women
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06260579 -
Home-based Exercise and Physical Activity Intervention After Kidney Transplantation: Impact of Exercise Intensity
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05695586 -
Effects of the Mindful Self-Compassion (MSC) Program
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT02202707 -
Vasomotor Symptoms and Cardiovascular Control
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04791618 -
MECA Clinical Intervention ( MECA Health360x)
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02453217 -
The Potential Efficacy of the Chinese Health Improvement Profile- A Pilot Clustered Randomised Controlled Trial
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03090321 -
MyHeart Counts Cardiovascular Health Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01293253 -
Effect of Daily Stair Walking on Cardiovascular Health
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03504059 -
School-based Behavioural Intervention to Face Obesity and Promote Cardiovascular Health Among Spanish Adolescents
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01551355 -
Promoting Heart Health in Preschool Children
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT05004454 -
Effect of Bacillus Subtilis BS50 Supplementation on Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Healthy Adults
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05887622 -
The Potassium Supplementation Study
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04121741 -
Singing and Cardiovascular Health in Older Adults
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04715126 -
Evaluate Efficacy of Oxyjun on Cardiovascular Health in Healthy Individuals.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03467061 -
The Effect of Dietary Nitrate on the Oral Microbiome
|
N/A |