Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Terminated
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT04084015 |
Other study ID # |
2019P000668 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Terminated |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
October 1, 2019 |
Est. completion date |
March 23, 2021 |
Study information
Verified date |
June 2021 |
Source |
Massachusetts General Hospital |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Veno-arterial extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is used as a rescue strategy for
patients in acute hemodynamic deterioration such as cardiogenic shock and cardiopulmonary
arrest with severe pulmonary congestion. VA ECMO is the fastest way to stabilize a patient
with cardiogenic shock and improve end-organ perfusion. However, one of the major
disadvantages of peripheral VA-ECMO is that it provides no left ventricular unloading and
increases left ventricular (LV) afterload secondary to the retrograde blood flow. Therefore,
LV wall tension and myocardial oxygen demand may actually increase in the setting of VA ECMO.
The Impella® device is a miniature rotary blood pump which can be inserted retrograde across
the aortic valve. In this configuration, it withdraws blood from the LV and ejects it into
the ascending aorta. It unloads the left ventricle, reducing LV wall tension and myocardial
oxygen demand and increasing myocardial blood flow. The Impella® 5.0 is an FDA approved pump
designed for intermediate support in patients with severe, cardiogenic shock. The axillary
positioning allows for early extubation and ambulation and is more stable than groin
placement.
In present practice, the decision to place an Impella® pump in VA-ECMO patients is based on
the perceived need for direct LV unloading or when a bridge device is required to transition
off ECMO support. Patients with peripheral VA ECMO are managed with inotropic agents at the
beginning and once patients develop pulmonary edema mechanical LV unloading is considered
electively. The advantage of LV unloading with Impella® has been demonstrated in recent
studies. We also reported that concomitant implantation of Impella® with VA ECMO for LV
unloading resulted in improved survival and recovery of ventricular performance in patients
with cardiogenic shock. Compared to delayed elective LV unloading, early LV unloading could
lead to decreased pulmonary edema, improved oxygenation delivery to the myocardium, increased
chance of LV recovery and improved survival.
The objective of this prospective study is to assess whether the early direct ventricular
unloading using axillary Impella® leads to higher rates of cardiac recovery, defined as
survival free from mechanical circulatory support, heart transplantation or inotropic support
at thirty days, compared with the conventional, elective placement of Impella® after
developing significant pulmonary congestion.
Description:
This prospective, single-arm trial will include all consecutive patients undergoing
cannulation of peripheral VA ECMO at the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) from April 2019
to March 2020. All enrolled patients will undergo surgical placement of Impella® via axillary
artery within 48 hours after peripheral VA ECMO initiation and be managed with early
extubation and ambulation strategy.
After Impella® placement, there will be no research procedures performed. Subjects will
receive standard of care and the subject's progress will be documented throughout the 30 days
study follow-up. The data obtained from the electronic medical record in Epic health record
system at MGH will be reviewed throughout the study.
The primary outcome of this study will be survival at 30 days. Prespecified secondary end
points will include the rate of death from cardiovascular causes, New York Heart Association
(NYHA) functional class, LV function (assessed by echocardiography), and the rate of stroke,
neurological functional status, acute kidney injury, vascular complications, and bleeding.
The enrolled subjects (early Impella®) would be compared with patients who underwent current
elective placement of Impella® after cannulation of VA ECMO (elective Impella®) in the past
two years. Student's t-test (for continuous variables) or Fisher exact test (for categorical
variables) will be used for between-group comparisons. The primary endpoint in the data
analysis is binary: 30-day survival. The null hypothesis of no difference between early
Impella® and elective Impella® will be tested using logistic regression. The secondary
endpoint, the rate of death from cardiovascular causes, NYHA functional class, LV function,
and the rate of stroke, neurological functional status, acute kidney injury, vascular
complications, and bleeding, will be addressed using competing risks hazard regression
models. This is a pilot study for the future multicenter study. If this study demonstrates no
inferiority or any significant superiority, we will proceed to do multicenter prospective
study. Power analysis will be assessed based on the result of this preliminary study.