Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT04119323 |
Other study ID # |
IMAGE-LBBP study |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
September 24, 2019 |
Est. completion date |
July 14, 2020 |
Study information
Verified date |
December 2020 |
Source |
Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Observational
|
Clinical Trial Summary
This is a prospective, multi-site, non-randomized, data collection study. The purpose of this
study is to investigate the correlation between pacing sites and ECG morphology or pacing
parameters during left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) and perform the use condition analysis to
assess the long-term performance of pacing lead during LBBP.
Description:
His bundle pacing (HBP) is a physiological pacing, but also has some limitations, including
high and unstable pacing threshold in 5-10% patients, low R-wave amplitude causing
inappropriate pacing management, damage to the His bundle during implantation. On the other
hand, left bundle branch pacing (LBBP), achieved via trans-ventricular septal approach with
the pacing lead tip at the left side of the ventricular septum, has recently initiated and
been widely practiced in China because of easy implantation, relatively narrow paced QRS
duration, low and stable pacing threshold, high R wave amplitude, and the LBBB correction by
a low pacing output.
As LBBP is in the early phase of clinical practice in China, in order to better conduct LBBP
implantation and understand mechanisms of LBBP therapy, physicians often do imaging
assessment of the pacing lead in patients implanted with LBBP based on clinical necessity.
Additionally, there is no report of mid/long-term correlation between lead location and
ventricular electrical activity, nor mid/long-term pacing lead performance assessment during
LBBP.