Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05110820
Other study ID # CO-pupillometer
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date August 1, 2019
Est. completion date January 31, 2021

Study information

Verified date October 2021
Source Wonju Severance Christian Hospital
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

Neurological complications after acute carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning can range from transient headache or dizziness to cognitive dysfunction, seizure, permanent anoxic brain damages or death. A recent study reported that a lack of standard pupillary light reflex (sPLR), assessed using a pen light, was a predictor of 30-day neurological sequelae in patients with CO poisoning. Given that the basic sPLR has a poor inter-rater reliability, more objective and quantitative methods are required in the assessment of PLR. An automated pupillometer has been used in the intensive care unit to quantitatively assess the PLR. Therefore, we hypothesized that quantitative assessment of PLR might be associated with neurocognitive sequelae after acute CO poisoning. The purpose of this study was to assess the value of quantitative pupillary reactivity (NPi and qPLR) in comparison to that of sPLR in predicting neurocognitive outcome at 1 month after acute CO poisoning.


Description:

Neurological complications after acute carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning can range from transient headache or dizziness to cognitive dysfunction, seizure, permanent anoxic brain damages or death. Although hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO2) has been tried to minimize the neurological complications, a significant percentage of patients still suffer from neurocognitive sequelae after acute CO poisoning. A recent study reported that a lack of standard pupillary light reflex (sPLR), assessed using a pen light, was a predictor of 30-day neurological sequelae in patients with CO poisoning. Given that the basic sPLR has a poor inter-rater reliability, more objective and quantitative methods are required in the assessment of PLR. An automated pupillometer has been used in the intensive care unit to quantitatively assess the PLR. Quantitative PLR (qPLR), which is expressed as the percentage pupillary constriction in response to a calibrated light stimulus, was better in predicting neurological outcome after cardiac arrest (CA) compared to standard light reflex. In addition, the Neurological Pupil index (NPi) has been validated as a tool for assessing prognosis after CA because it is not influenced by medications (especially opioids and neuromuscular blocking agents) or small pupil size. Therefore, the investigators hypothesized that quantitative assessment of PLR might be associated with neurocognitive sequelae after acute CO poisoning. The purpose of this study was to assess the value of quantitative pupillary reactivity (NPi and qPLR) in comparison to that of sPLR in predicting neurocognitive outcome at 1 month after acute CO poisoning.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 104
Est. completion date January 31, 2021
Est. primary completion date December 31, 2020
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 19 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Acute CO poisoning Exclusion Criteria: - Age <19 years - Patients with a history of ophthalmic surgery which might have affected the PLR - Patients with baseline cognitive deficit - Refusal to enroll in this study - Discharge from the ED or transfer to another hospital within 24 hours - Expired in the ED - Co-ingestion of drugs, such as hypnotics, that may affect the PLR - No follow-up for the neurocognitive outcome

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Diagnostic Test:
Automated quantitative pupillometer
Quantitative measurement of pupillary variables was performed at the time of arrival at the ED (0 h), and at the 6-, 12-, and 24-h time points on hospital day (HD) 1. The worst value among those recorded within 24 h and during the total measurement period was selected as the 24-h and total lowest values. If a patient was discharged before HD 3, measurements were taken only until discharge. The initial value was measured within 1 h after arrival at the ED because of the requisite time for obtaining informed consent before enrollment. At each time point, the lowest values for the NPi and qPLR of each eye were retained for analysis. The sPLR (standard PLR) was serially measured in the ED and after admission by emergency physicians using a manual penlight. We classified the reactivity of the sPLR as reactive, sluggish, or non-reactive. Non-reactive sPLR was defined when pupillary reactivity was not identified bilaterally.

Locations

Country Name City State
Korea, Republic of Wonju Severance Christian Hospital Wonju Gangwon

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Wonju Severance Christian Hospital Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Korea, Republic of, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary The prediction of neurological pupil index (NPi) for poor neurocognitive outcome The predictive value of NPi for the 1-month poor neurocognitive outcome after acute CO poisoning Within 3 days after acute CO poisoning
Primary The prediction of quantitative pupillary light reflex (qPLR) for poor neurocognitive outcome The predictive value of qPLR for the 1-month poor neurocognitive outcome after acute CO poisoning Within 3 days after acute CO poisoning
Primary Comparison of predictive value for poor neurocognitive outcome between NPi and standard pupillary light reflex (sPLR) The value of NPi in comparison to that of sPLR in predicting neurocognitive outcome at 1 month after acute CO poisoning Within 3 days after acute CO poisoning
Primary Comparison of predictive value for poor neurocognitive outcome between qPLR and sPLR The value of qPLR in comparison to that of sPLR in predicting neurocognitive outcome at 1 month after acute CO poisoning Within 3 days after acute CO poisoning
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03669848 - Is Transcutaneous Carbon Monoxide Saturation of E-cigarette Users Comparable to That of Smokers?
Completed NCT04656912 - Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Initiation Time in Acute Carbon Monoxide Poisoning
Recruiting NCT04975867 - Adjunct Targeted Temperature Management in Acute Severe Carbon Monoxide Poisoning N/A
Terminated NCT01099995 - Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Comatose Patients With Acute Carbon Monoxide Poisoning Phase 3
Terminated NCT01100515 - Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Acute Domestic Carbon Monoxide (CO) Poisoning Phase 3
Terminated NCT03017742 - Utility of Non-invasive Carboxyhemoglobin and Total Hemoglobin Measurement in the Emergency Department
Terminated NCT01059708 - Outcome Following Carbon Monoxide Poisoning in Children N/A
Recruiting NCT05591300 - Microparticles Blood Level in Acute Carbon Monoxide Poisoning
Not yet recruiting NCT04475263 - Cognitive and Blood Biomarker Assessment After CO Exposure
Completed NCT03926494 - Carbon Monoxide-induced Coma: Prognostic Factors
Recruiting NCT02375126 - Normal Quantitative EEG (qEEG) Dataset
Completed NCT03342209 - Utility of High Flow Nasal Cannula in CO Toxicity N/A
Completed NCT00465855 - One vs. Three Hyperbaric Oxygen Treatments for Acute Carbon Monoxide Poisoning Phase 4
Recruiting NCT04490317 - CARbon monoxidE intoxiCatiOn in Korea: Prospective Cohort (CARE CO Cohort)
Withdrawn NCT04118491 - Hyperbaric Oxygen for Carbon Monoxide Induced Chronic Encephalopathy N/A
Unknown status NCT00841165 - Carbon Monoxide Monitoring and Emergency Treatment N/A
Withdrawn NCT00280579 - Cyanide Poisoning in Fire Victims N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT02483650 - Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Registry
Completed NCT05088005 - Prognostic Biomarkers in CO Poisoning
Completed NCT03030833 - Dysfunctional Hemoglobin Pulse Oximetry N/A