Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05110820 |
Other study ID # |
CO-pupillometer |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
August 1, 2019 |
Est. completion date |
January 31, 2021 |
Study information
Verified date |
October 2021 |
Source |
Wonju Severance Christian Hospital |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Observational
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Neurological complications after acute carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning can range from
transient headache or dizziness to cognitive dysfunction, seizure, permanent anoxic brain
damages or death. A recent study reported that a lack of standard pupillary light reflex
(sPLR), assessed using a pen light, was a predictor of 30-day neurological sequelae in
patients with CO poisoning. Given that the basic sPLR has a poor inter-rater reliability,
more objective and quantitative methods are required in the assessment of PLR.
An automated pupillometer has been used in the intensive care unit to quantitatively assess
the PLR. Therefore, we hypothesized that quantitative assessment of PLR might be associated
with neurocognitive sequelae after acute CO poisoning. The purpose of this study was to
assess the value of quantitative pupillary reactivity (NPi and qPLR) in comparison to that of
sPLR in predicting neurocognitive outcome at 1 month after acute CO poisoning.
Description:
Neurological complications after acute carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning can range from
transient headache or dizziness to cognitive dysfunction, seizure, permanent anoxic brain
damages or death. Although hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO2) has been tried to minimize the
neurological complications, a significant percentage of patients still suffer from
neurocognitive sequelae after acute CO poisoning. A recent study reported that a lack of
standard pupillary light reflex (sPLR), assessed using a pen light, was a predictor of 30-day
neurological sequelae in patients with CO poisoning. Given that the basic sPLR has a poor
inter-rater reliability, more objective and quantitative methods are required in the
assessment of PLR.
An automated pupillometer has been used in the intensive care unit to quantitatively assess
the PLR. Quantitative PLR (qPLR), which is expressed as the percentage pupillary constriction
in response to a calibrated light stimulus, was better in predicting neurological outcome
after cardiac arrest (CA) compared to standard light reflex. In addition, the Neurological
Pupil index (NPi) has been validated as a tool for assessing prognosis after CA because it is
not influenced by medications (especially opioids and neuromuscular blocking agents) or small
pupil size.
Therefore, the investigators hypothesized that quantitative assessment of PLR might be
associated with neurocognitive sequelae after acute CO poisoning. The purpose of this study
was to assess the value of quantitative pupillary reactivity (NPi and qPLR) in comparison to
that of sPLR in predicting neurocognitive outcome at 1 month after acute CO poisoning.