View clinical trials related to Candidiasis.
Filter by:Recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (RVVC), also known as recurrent yeast infections, is defined as at least 3 episodes of acute VVC in the past 12 months. Several properties of oteseconazole (VT-1161) suggest that it might be a safer and more effective treatment for RVVC than other oral anti-fungal medicines. This study will evaluate the effectiveness and safety of oteseconazole (VT-1161) for the treatment of RVVC and consists of 2 parts. The first part of the study is a 2-week period for the treatment of the patient's current VVC episode with 3 150mg doses of fluconazole. The 2nd part consists of 12 weeks, when the patient will take either oteseconazole (VT-1161) 150 mg or a placebo (according to a random assignment), and then a 36-week follow-up period. In addition, at participating sites, an amendment to the study allows US patients who complete the initial 48 weeks without experiencing a confirmed RVVC episode to continue in a 48-week observational extension period designed to evaluate the continued effectiveness of oteseconazole (VT-1161). This study is identical to VMT-VT-1161-CL-012 (NCT03561701).
Recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (RVVC), also known as recurrent yeast infections, is defined as at least 3 episodes of acute VVC in the past 12 months. Several properties of oteseconazole (VT-1161) suggest that it might be a safer and more effective treatment for RVVC than other oral antifungal medicines. This study will evaluate the effectiveness and safety of oteseconazole (VT-1161) for the treatment of RVVC and consists of 2 parts. The first part of the study is a 2-week period for the treatment of the patient's current VVC episode with 3 150mg doses of fluconazole. The 2nd part consists of 12 weeks, when the patient will take either oteseconazole (VT-1161) 150 mg or a placebo (according to a random assignment), and then a 36-week follow-up period. In addition, at participating sites, an amendment to the study allows US patients who complete the initial 48 weeks without experiencing a confirmed RVVC episode to continue in a 48-week observational extension period designed to evaluate the continued effectiveness of oteseconazole (VT-1161). This study is identical to VMT-VT-1161-CL-011.
Candida species are both known to colonize physiologically mucosal surfaces in the human body without causing signs or symptoms of infection and to cause a wide variety of diseases, including mucocutaneous infections and potentially fatal invasive infections of the bloodstream or organs. Throughout the past decades, invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are of increasing importance even in non-neutropenic patients who are in need of treatment in intensive care units (ICU) or have undergone major surgeries. Several factors like parenteral nutrition, central venous catheters, broad spectrum antibiotics admission, disturbance of gastrointestinal mucosa integrity have been associated with an increased incidence of IFIs. Positive testing for 1,3-ß-D-Glucan (BDG) in serum is widely used to assess invasive fungal infections. It detects circulating BDG, which is part of the fungal cell wall of clinical relevant fungi such as Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp.. The issue of BDG kinetics after intestinal mucosal damage (e.g. mucositis or gut surgery) is poorly understood. Intestinal mucosal damage is characterized by a loss of integrity of the intestinal mucosal barrier and increasing translocations of bacterial and/or fungal commensals of the gastrointestinal tract. In abdominal surgery a key concern in serum BDG kinetics is the potential introduction of BDG from surgical sponges and gauze or mucosal damage due to surgical damage of the mucosal integrity. Compared to open abdominal surgery in laparoscopic abdominal surgery sponges and gauze are rarely used. As life-threatening intraabdominal candidiasis occurs in 30 to 40% of high-risk abdominal surgical intensive care unit (ICU) patients it is of utmost importance to obtain reliable BDG values for diagnosis or exclusion of invasive candidiasis.
The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the pharmacokinetic profile of micafungin administered to neonates suffering from systemic candidiasis. This study will also evaluate the proportion of success and of failure of the therapy with micafungin among treated neonates and will identify a conversion factor to relate plasma levels of micafungin into capillary and venous blood measured through blood samples from the heel and from a peripheral vein, collected simultaneously. Safety of micafungin in neonates will also be assessed.
This is a multicenter, open-label, non-comparator, single-arm study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, tolerability and PK (pharmacokinetics) of oral SCY-078 as an emergency use treatment for patients with a documented Candida auris infection.
This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, dose-finding study to compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of oral SCY-078 versus oral fluconazole in adult female subjects 18 years and older with moderate to severe Acute Vulvovaginal Candidiasis (AVVC). Approximately 180 eligible subjects (30 subjects per treatment group) will be enrolled and randomized into the study.
This clinical study identified the Candida species from the palate and complete dentures of edentulous individuals with prostheses-related stomatitis (PRS) and evaluated the effect of disinfectant solutions for denture hygiene on Candida spp. Sixty participants were randomly assigned in 04 parallel groups (n = 15); They were oriented to brush their prostheses and the palate 3 times a day and immerse them in saline solution (C-control), 0.25% Sodium hypochlorite (HS0.25%), 10% Ricinus communis (RC10%) or 0.5% Chloramine T (CT 0.5%) for 20 minutes. Biofilm samples were collected from the prostheses and palate in the baseline, after 7 and 37 days of use of the solutions and seeded in CHROMagar Candida medium. After incubation period, the presumptive identification, incidence verification and quantification of Candida species growth (CFU count) were performed. To quantify biofilm with software ImageTool 3.0, the inner surface was disclosed (1% neutral red) and photographed at the end of each period. The Candidiasis remission was assessed by scores before and after the use of solutions by palate's phographs. Descriptive analyzes were used for the identification and incidence of Candida spp. Kruskal-Wallis and Friedman tests, with stepwise step-down post-test for cell growth; ANOVA and Tukey for biofilm removal; Frequency of scores for evolution of inflammation. Level of significance was 95%. The most incident species were C. albicans, followed by C. tropicalis, C. glabrata and C. krusei. HS 0.25% reduced the incidence of the three species on the prostheses and palate in the periods of 7 and 37 days; CT 0.5% promoted reduction of Candida spp. only in dentures. R. communis decreased the incidence of C. tropicalis in both collection sites. For CFU counts, HS 0.25% and CT 0.5% caused significant reduction. For biofilm removal, HS0.25% was the most effective (9.75 ± 12.6) and RC10% (15.92 ± 14.8) intermediate. All groups decreased protheses-related stomatitis. HS0.25% has potential for clinical use as total denture disinfectants. RC10% and CT0.5% require further studies to be indicated as alternative solutions.
Intraabdominal fungal infections with Candida are constantly increasing. Their diagnosis and treatment is difficult. Morbidity and mortality are high. Β-D-Glucan has been proposed as a marker of systemic fungal infection in candidemia. Moreover, its kinetics is associated with therapeutic success. On the other hand, there are no data on intraabdominal infections that are much more frequent. The objective of the study is to evaluate the initial levels of β-D-glucan and its daily kinetics during the treatment of fungal peritonitis in resuscitation compared to a control group with a yeast-free peritonitis.
Septic shock is associated with acquired immunoparalysis which is associated with a high risk of nosocomial acquired infection. Nosocomial candidiasis is associated with a 50% rate of mortality but is difficult to diagnose. The use of colonization indexes and risk factors on the other hand expose to unnecessary use of antifungals. The aim of the present study is to evaluate whether the host response to infection associated with candida biomarkers would help to anticipate the candidiasis onset.
This is a multi-center, randomized, prospective, active-controlled, double-blind, dose-escalation study comparing dose response of clinical efficacy, safety, local tolerability of three different doses of ProF-001/Candiplus® (Candiplus® 0.2%, Candiplus® with 0.3%, Candiplus® with 0.4%) to 1% clotrimazole vaginal cream. Patients with acute episode of vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) will be randomized to receive a daily dose of either 5 ml (intravaginal) of Candiplus® at three different doses for the first 3 days and 2.5 ml for the remaining 3 days or 5 ml (intravaginal) application of 1% clotrimazole cream over the first 3 days and 2.5 ml for the remaining 3 days according to the following scheme (with each application 2 cm of cream will be applied to the vulvar region): Cohort 1: Candiplus® 0.2% versus clotrimazole mono Cohort 2: Candiplus® 0.3% versus clotrimazole mono Cohort 3: Candiplus® 0.4% versus clotrimazole mono Randomization into the cohorts will occur consecutively from the lowest dose to the highest dose, i.e. patients will be randomized first in cohort 1 and finally in cohort 3. The proposed study is - after a pilot study to assess critical pharmacokinetic data - the second study within a clinical trial program with the objective to develop a new combination therapy for the treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis. The new combination consists of two registered drug substances.