Cancer of the Prostate Clinical Trial
Official title:
Assessing the Effectiveness of Photon Therapy With a Proton Therapy Boost in the Treatment of Prostate Cancer as Compared to Photon Therapy Alone
Verified date | November 2023 |
Source | University of Cincinnati |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This study uses photon radiation with a proton boost to treat prostate cancer. The purpose of this study is to determine if proton therapy as a boost following photon intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) produces decreased toxicity as compared to conventional photon IMRT alone in the treatment of prostate cancer. Our secondary objective is to determine the effectiveness of this treatment regimen. Effectiveness will be determined by length of time to progression or recurrence of disease and overall survival. Patients on this study will be treated with a course of photon radiation therapy followed by a boost course of proton radiation.
Status | Active, not recruiting |
Enrollment | 10 |
Est. completion date | April 2033 |
Est. primary completion date | April 2033 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Male |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - =18 years of age - Diagnosis of low risk prostate cancer (T1c-T2a, Gleason 6, Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) <10) -OR- - Diagnosis of intermediate risk prostate cancer (T1c-T2c, Gleason 7 and/or PSA 10- 20) - Life expectancy >10 yrs - Physically and mentally capable of signing the consent form of their own volition Exclusion Criteria: - < 18 years of age - Diagnosis of high risk prostate cancer (T3 or higher, Gleason >7 and/or PSA >20) - Current or historical use of androgen deprivation therapy - Nodal positivity - Previous cancer excluding non-melanoma skin cancer - History of prostatectomy - History of brachytherapy for prostate cancer - Life expectancy <10 yrs - Physically or mentally incapable of signing the consent form of their own volition |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | University of Cincinnati | Cincinnati | Ohio |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University of Cincinnati |
United States,
Andrzejewski P, Kuess P, Knausl B, Pinker K, Georg P, Knoth J, Berger D, Kirisits C, Goldner G, Helbich T, Potter R, Georg D. Feasibility of dominant intraprostatic lesion boosting using advanced photon-, proton- or brachytherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2015 Dec;117(3):509-14. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.07.028. Epub 2015 Sep 6. — View Citation
Arrayeh E, Westphalen AC, Kurhanewicz J, Roach M 3rd, Jung AJ, Carroll PR, Coakley FV. Does local recurrence of prostate cancer after radiation therapy occur at the site of primary tumor? Results of a longitudinal MRI and MRSI study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Apr 1;82(5):e787-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.11.030. Epub 2012 Feb 11. — View Citation
Boccon-Gibod LM, Dumonceau O, Toublanc M, Ravery V, Boccon-Gibod LA. Micro-focal prostate cancer: a comparison of biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen features. Eur Urol. 2005 Dec;48(6):895-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.04.033. — View Citation
Bossart EL, Stoyanova R, Sandler K, Studenski M, Orman A, Abramowitz M, Pollack A. Feasibility and Initial Dosimetric Findings for a Randomized Trial Using Dose-Painted Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Defined Targets in Prostate Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Jun 1;95(2):827-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.01.052. Epub 2016 Feb 4. — View Citation
Gregori A, Vieweg J, Dahm P, Paulson DF. Comparison of ultrasound-guided biopsies and prostatectomy specimens: predictive accuracy of Gleason score and tumor site. Urol Int. 2001;66(2):66-71. doi: 10.1159/000056573. — View Citation
Johansson S, Astrom L, Sandin F, Isacsson U, Montelius A, Turesson I. Hypofractionated proton boost combined with external beam radiotherapy for treatment of localized prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer. 2012;2012:654861. doi: 10.1155/2012/654861. Epub 2012 Jul 8. — View Citation
Nihei K, Ogino T, Ishikura S, Kawashima M, Nishimura H, Arahira S, Onozawa M. Phase II feasibility study of high-dose radiotherapy for prostate cancer using proton boost therapy: first clinical trial of proton beam therapy for prostate cancer in Japan. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2005 Dec;35(12):745-52. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyi193. Epub 2005 Nov 28. — View Citation
Peeters ST, Heemsbergen WD, Koper PC, van Putten WL, Slot A, Dielwart MF, Bonfrer JM, Incrocci L, Lebesque JV. Dose-response in radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: results of the Dutch multicenter randomized phase III trial comparing 68 Gy of radiotherapy with 78 Gy. J Clin Oncol. 2006 May 1;24(13):1990-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.2530. — View Citation
Pollack A, Zagars GK, Starkschall G, Antolak JA, Lee JJ, Huang E, von Eschenbach AC, Kuban DA, Rosen I. Prostate cancer radiation dose response: results of the M. D. Anderson phase III randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Aug 1;53(5):1097-105. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)02829-8. — View Citation
Scales CD, Amling CL, Kane CJ, et al. Can unilateral Prostate Cancer be Reliably Predicted Based Upon Biopsy Features? J Urol. 2006; 175:373.
Schulte RT, Wood DP, Daignault S, Shah RB, Wei JT. Utility of extended pattern prostate biopsies for tumor localization: pathologic correlations after radical prostatectomy. Cancer. 2008 Oct 1;113(7):1559-65. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23781. — View Citation
* Note: There are 11 references in all — Click here to view all references
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Hematuria - Change from baseline | Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events - Hematuria Scale - 1(least severe) - 5 (most severe) | Post therapy - 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60 months, 6,7,8,9,10 years | |
Primary | Urinary Incontinence - Change from baseline | Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events - Urinary Incontinence Scale - 1(least severe) - 3 (most severe) | Post therapy - 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60 months, 6,7,8,9,10 years | |
Primary | Dysuria - Change from baseline | Presence or Absence | Post therapy - 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60 months, 6,7,8,9,10 years | |
Primary | International Prostate Symptom Score - Change from baseline | Records patient reported urinary symptoms - Scale 1-35 - 1-7 Mild symptoms, 8-19 Moderate symptoms, 20-35 Severe symptoms | Post therapy - 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60 months, 6,7,8,9,10 years | |
Primary | Rectal Bleeding - Change from baseline | Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events - Rectal Hemorrhage Scale - 1(least severe) - 5 (most severe) | Post therapy - 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60 months, 6,7,8,9,10 years | |
Primary | Erectile Dysfunction - Change from baseline | Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events - Erectile Dysfunction Scale - 1(least severe) - 3 (most severe) | Post therapy - 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60 months, 6,7,8,9,10 years | |
Secondary | Progression Free Survival | Measured by time to cancer recurrence | Monitored for 10 years after completion of radiation therapy | |
Secondary | Overall Survival | Measured by time to cancer-related death | Monitored for 10 years after completion of radiation therapy |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03653819 -
High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) for Patients With Cancer-related Lymphedema in the Lower Limbs
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT05191017 -
Study of NUV-422 in Combination With Enzalutamide in Patients With mCRPC
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00970203 -
Dendritic Cell (DC)-Based Vaccines Loaded With Allogeneic Prostate Cell Lines in Combination With Androgen Ablation in Patients With Prostate Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06363266 -
A SMART Design to Optimize the Delivery of TEMPO for Men With Prostate Cancer and Their Caregivers
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02003924 -
Safety and Efficacy Study of Enzalutamide in Patients With Nonmetastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00643617 -
CyberKnife Radiosurgery For Low & Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer: Emulating HDR Brachytherapy Dosimetry
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00844792 -
Study of Antioxidants on Prostate Tumors in Men Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01303705 -
Anti-OX40, Cyclophosphamide (CTX) and Radiation in Patients With Progressive Metastatic Prostate Cancer
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT02578940 -
Fluciclovine (18F) PET/CT in biochemicAL reCurrence Of Prostate caNcer
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT04057859 -
PCa Patients Managed With ADT to Examine the Effect of Nutritional Guidance and Aerobic/Resistance Fitness Training
|
||
Completed |
NCT00564928 -
A Phase 2 Study to Investigate the Clinical Activity of IPI-504 in Patients With Hormone-resistant Prostate Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02958787 -
Vessel Sparing Prostate Radiation Therapy
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01897207 -
Phase I/II Study of Vaccination With Antigen Loaded Dendritic Cells (DCs) in Hormone-Refractory Prostate Cancer
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05241236 -
MRI/Ultrasound Fusion Guided Laser Ablation of Prostate Cancer
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03939689 -
Study of I-131-1095 Radiotherapy in Combination With Enzalutamide in Patients With Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Who Are Chemotherapy Naive and Have Progressed on Abiraterone
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02274350 -
The Herlev Hospital Post Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer Database for Sexual Side Effects
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00744549 -
Study of Antioxidants on MRI Detectable Early Stage Prostate Cancer Among Men on Active Surveillance
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05252390 -
NUV-868 as Monotherapy and in Combination With Olaparib or Enzalutamide in Adult Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02212548 -
Prostate-Rectal Separation With PEG Hydrogel and Its Effect on Decreasing Rectal Dose
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04017325 -
European Randomised Study of TOOKAD® Soluble for Prostate Cancer vs Active Surveillance. Post Study Follow-up
|