Cancer Cervix Clinical Trial
— PARCEROfficial title:
Phase III Randomized Trial of Image Guided Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IG-IMRT) and Conventional Radiotherapy for Late Toxicity Reduction After Postoperative Radiotherapy in Ca Cervix.
Verified date | June 2020 |
Source | Tata Memorial Hospital |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The study tests Tomtherapy based Image Guided Radiation against conventional radiation techniques for it's ability to reduce long term small bowel toxicity.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 300 |
Est. completion date | January 31, 2020 |
Est. primary completion date | December 30, 2019 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Female |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Histopathological diagnosis of carcinoma cervix with postoperative intermediate or high risk features. - Age >18 years. - Planned for Wertheim's hysterectomy or has already undergone Wertheim's hysterectomy OR has undergone Simple Hysterectomy with no evidence of residual nodes on MRI/PET imaging+/- confirmatory nodal biopsy. - No evidence of paraaortic nodal metastasis. Exclusion Criteria: - History of multiple previous abdominal surgeries placing patient at baseline high risk of bowel toxicity or any other medical condition with baseline bowel movement disorder. - Rectal Polyps or extensive hemorrhoids. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
India | Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre | Navi Mumbai | Maharashtra |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Tata Memorial Hospital |
India,
Chopra S, Engineer R, Mahantshetty U, Misra S, Phurailatpam R, Paul SN, Kannan S, Kerkar R, Maheshwari A, Shylasree Ts, Ghosh J, Gupta S, Thomas B, Singh S, Sharma S, Chilikuri S, Shrivastava SK. Protocol for a phase III randomised trial of image-guided intensity modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT) and conventional radiotherapy for late small bowel toxicity reduction after postoperative adjuvant radiation in Ca cervix. BMJ Open. 2012 Dec 12;2(6). pii: e001896. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001896. Print 2012. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Late bowel toxicity = Grade II | Time to event and severity of late bowel toxicity are assessed | Median follow up of 3 years | |
Secondary | To identify small bowel dose volume characteristics that predict for = Grade II late toxicity | Data on dosimetric analysis of small bowel dose in reference to volume are collected in both arms and assessed for predicting dose prescription for = grade II late bowel toxcity | Median follow up of 3 years | |
Secondary | To evaluate acute toxicity difference in two study arms using CTCAE version 3.0 | Acute toxicity will be reported using CTCAE V.3.0. CTCAE forms will be filled before starting radiation, weekly during radiation treatment and on each scheduled follow-up. If any toxicity occurs at another time point additional forms will be filled to capture the same. Acute toxicity difference will be calculated between the two study arms. | Within 90 days | |
Secondary | Preoperative functional imaging features that predict for local and distant recurrence will be identified | Images acquired pre-operatively are analysed for features that predict local and distant recurrence. | 3 years after completion of accrual | |
Secondary | To compare quality of life between Tomotherapy vs conventional radiotherapy arm using EORTC QLQ C30 | Assessment is done for all enrolled patients to compare the quality of life after treatment with tomotherapy and conventional radiation . EORTC QLQC30 module will be used for evaluating QOL of patients. QOL scoring will be done as per standard recommendations outlined in EORTC QLQ C30 scoring manual. All patients will undergo QOL evaluation at baseline, after treatment and at subsequent follow-up. Scale- Not at all-1 , A little Bit-2, Quite a bit-3, very much-4. 1 will be considered as better outcome & 4 will be considered as worst outcome. |
3 years from completion of accrual | |
Secondary | To compare quality of life between Tomotherapy vs conventional radiotherapy arm using EORTC QLQ CX24 | Assessment is done for all enrolled patients to compare the quality of life after treatment with tomotherapy and conventional radiation. EORTC QLQCX24 module will be used to assess disease-specific and treatment-specific aspects of QoL in patients with cervical cancer. CX24 QOL scoring will be done as per standard recommendations outlined in EORTC QLQ CX24 scoring manual. All patients will undergo QOL evaluation at baseline, after treatment and at subsequent follow-up. Scale- Not at all-1 , A little Bit-2, Quite a bit-3, very much-4. 1 will be considered as better outcome & 4 will be considered as worst outcome. |
3 years from completion of accrual |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT03301493 -
Genomic Testing and Resulting Medical Decisions
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04767425 -
Image Guided Brachytherapy in Locally Advanced Cancer Cervix
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03420157 -
Carrying Out of Focus Group to Improve Cervical Screening Proposal by Vaginal Self-sampling (APACHE-4/FG).
|
||
Completed |
NCT02255084 -
Vaginal Self-sampling and Human Papillomavirus Testing in Unscreened Women
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05653063 -
ARCHERY - Artificial Intelligence Based Radiotherapy Treatment Planning for Cervical, Head and Neck and Prostate Cancer
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT06128694 -
Effect of NUTRICAN to Improve Nutritional Status in Cancer Patients
|
Phase 3 |