View clinical trials related to Calculi.
Filter by:The objective of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the home-use device Silk'n toothbrush (ToothWave) for the improvement in dental health through the reduction of plaque, gingivitis, and calculus.
Ultraslow full-power SWL versus slow power-ramping SWL in ureteric stones with high attenuation value
Ultraslow full-power SWL versus slow power-ramping SWL in stones with high attenuation value
The purpose of this study is to compare ureteroscopy with and without use of safety guide-wire in treatment of ureteral stone
The investigators aim at this study to prospectively assess procedure-related outcomes after RIRS for renal calculi less than 20 mm, including stone free rate (SFR), predictors of successful outcome, complications types/rate, readmission rate and the need of auxiliary procedures. In addition, patient-reported outcomes after this modality of intervention are going to be assessed.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of saline solution irrigation in decreasing residual common bile duct (CBD) stones.
Pain associated with renal stone disease is typically caused by an obstructing stone that obstructs the flow of urine, which results in renal collecting system dilatation. Non-obstructing renal calculi that do not cause renal collecting system dilatation are thought to be painless. The objective of this study is to prospectively determine if the removal of non-obstructing renal calculi can reduce or eliminate participant's pain and/or improve their quality of life.
The aim of the present study to perform a full cost analysis for the complete clearance of calyceal stones by retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) for the treatment of lower calyceal stones between 1 and 2 centimeters (cm) in size.
To discuss necessity of cholecystectomy for patients with stones in their bile ducts and gallbladders in the absence of absolute operation indications of cholecystectomy after clearance of bile duct stones with ERCP.
Background: The exit strategy after ureteroscopy for stone treatment remains a topic for discussion. Current EAU guidelines on urolithiasis state that postoperative stenting is indicated in patients at increased risk of postoperative complications. Stenting is not considered necessary in all other cases, and after uncomplicated procedures. Objective: To analyse the postoperative ureteral stenting strategy in clinical practice looking at the indication, type of stents used and the duration of stenting after ureteroscopy for stone treatment. Furthermore, the investigators will examine in what setting the stents are being removed postoperatively. Study design: This study is a prospective, observational, international, multicentre registry study executed by uCARE. Study population: All patients >18 years with a ureter or renal stone who are planned for ureteroscopic treatment by semi-rigid and/or flexible ureteroscopy are eligible for this study.