View clinical trials related to Bursitis.
Filter by:The patients will be randomly allocated into two equal groups (each 20 patients) using sealed opaque numbered envelopes: Control Group (C Group) : Patients receive continuous US suprascapular nerve block only. Gabapentin Group (G Group) : Patients receive continuous US suprascapular nerve block with oral gabapentin 300 mg once daily at bed time. Both groups compared as regard: Visual Analogue Scale Range of passive and active movements Patients satisfaction complication related to block The total dose of diclofenac sodium
this study will be a randomized clinical trial. This study will be conducted in Nishat Latif Hospital, Barath, Sialkot. A sample size of 22 patients will be taken. Patients will be divided into two groups by lottery method. Group A will be treated with mulligan mobilization technique and conventional physiotherapy with Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and electrical heating pad. Group B will be treated with muscle energy technique and conventional treatment of Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and electrical hot pack. Both groups will receive treatment for5 weeks,2 sessions in a week with baseline and 6 weeks treatment reading will be taken. The outcome measures Numeric pain rating scale, disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index . data will be analyzed by Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 25.
The study is designed to determine the effects of moderate physical activity on adhesive capsulitis in patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus.
Various stretches are used to lengthen the posterior shoulder capsule. No study has reported the comparison of the pragmatic posterior capsular stretch and cross body stertch
This study will compare between the effect of three treatment modalities of shoulder adhesive capsulitis to hilight the best technique to improve pain and range of motion outcome measures .
To evaluate the efficiencies of local corticosteroid injections and local anesthetics in patients with concomitant pes anserine bursitis and osteoarthritis.
Isolated and combined effectiveness of pragmatic protocols on shoulder range of motion had been investigated and found effective in healthy participants. To our knowledge, there was insufficient literature to support the comparison between pragmatic and traditional protocols in the treatment of shoulder pathologies.
This study will help the physiotherapists in overcoming the challenges and barriers in the treatment. It will also help researchers in acquiring sufficient knowledge for further research on the Bowen technique and its various applications as this technique is not widely applied in the field of physical therapy treatment.
Numerous Physiotherapy techniques have been found to be beneficial but there is no consensus on the best treatment approach for speeding up rehabilitation process and rejuvenating functional capacity in patients suffering from Adhesive capsulitis. Spencer Muscle energy technique is found to be effective in treatment of shoulder pathologies. It increases pain free range of motion through stretching the tissues, enhancing lymphatic flow and increasing the joint circulation where as Strain Counter Strain is a technique derived from positional release therapy which uses a pain monitor (trigger points) to find the position of the pain when it is no longer felt at the monitoring point. The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of Spencer Muscle energy technique with and without the employment of Strain Counter Strain on pain, Range of motion and disability in Adhesive capsulitis.
Adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder) is a condition of uncertain etiology characterized by pain and progressive loss of both active and passive shoulder motion. Shoulder pain and stiffness are accompanied by disability. It is thought that the incidence is 3 to 5% in the general population. Laser therapy is widely used for treating different musculoskeletal diseases, because of its ability to reduce pain and improve the physical function. Also, MWM when used for shoulders with limited range of motion because of pain had shown improvement in range of motion and pressure pain threshold. Previous studies have investigated the efficacy of combining different manual technique with LLLT for treating pain in some body parts. However, up till now the combined effect of MWM with LLLT for treatment of patients with shoulder adhesive capsulitis have not been investigated. So, the present randomized controlled study will be conducted to investigate the effect of adding mulligan mobilization with movement to low level laser therapy in treatment of patients with shoulder adhesive capsulitis.