Effects of Mindfulness Training on Burnout and Mood in Hospital Employees

Burnout Clinical Trial

Official title:

Behavioral Health Support for Health Care Providers During COVID 19: A Remote Mindfulness Intervention

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT04307563
• Other study ID #: IRB-54792
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: September 1, 2021
• Est. completion date: July 5, 2022

Study information

• Verified date: December 2022
• Source: Stanford University
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The primary aims of the study are to 1) provide a hospital employee population with a mindfulness based stress reduction workshop and 2) evaluate the impact of this clinically validated group mindfulness intervention on burnout in health care employees. Secondary outcomes will be anxiety, depression, quality of life and self compassion.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 52
• Est. completion date: July 5, 2022
• Est. primary completion date: July 5, 2022
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• English speaking

• Employees of Stanford Health Care

• Ability to attend a minimum of 4 out of 6 sessions

Exclusion Criteria:

• Non-English speaking

• Employees with severe medical or psychiatric conditions that prevent them from participating in the group format

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Anxiety Depression
• Burnout
• Burnout, Psychological

Intervention

Behavioral:
• Mindfulness session
1.5 hour weekly session with health educator

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	Stanford Health Care	Palo Alto	California

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Stanford University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (9)

Aiken LH, Clarke SP, Sloane DM, Sochalski J, Silber JH. Hospital nurse staffing and patient mortality, nurse burnout, and job dissatisfaction. JAMA. 2002 Oct 23-30;288(16):1987-93. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.16.1987. — View Citation

Bazarko D, Cate RA, Azocar F, Kreitzer MJ. The Impact of an Innovative Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Program on the Health and Well-Being of Nurses Employed in a Corporate Setting. J Workplace Behav Health. 2013 Apr;28(2):107-133. doi: 10.1080/15555240.2013.779518. — View Citation

DeSalvo KB, Jones TM, Peabody J, McDonald J, Fihn S, Fan V, He J, Muntner P. Health care expenditure prediction with a single item, self-rated health measure. Med Care. 2009 Apr;47(4):440-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318190b716. — View Citation

Hoge EA, Bui E, Marques L, Metcalf CA, Morris LK, Robinaugh DJ, Worthington JJ, Pollack MH, Simon NM. Randomized controlled trial of mindfulness meditation for generalized anxiety disorder: effects on anxiety and stress reactivity. J Clin Psychiatry. 2013 Aug;74(8):786-92. doi: 10.4088/JCP.12m08083. — View Citation

Raes F, Pommier E, Neff KD, Van Gucht D. Construction and factorial validation of a short form of the Self-Compassion Scale. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2011 May-Jun;18(3):250-5. doi: 10.1002/cpp.702. Epub 2010 Jun 8. — View Citation

Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092. — View Citation

Trockel M, Bohman B, Lesure E, Hamidi MS, Welle D, Roberts L, Shanafelt T. A Brief Instrument to Assess Both Burnout and Professional Fulfillment in Physicians: Reliability and Validity, Including Correlation with Self-Reported Medical Errors, in a Sample of Resident and Practicing Physicians. Acad Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;42(1):11-24. doi: 10.1007/s40596-017-0849-3. Epub 2017 Dec 1. — View Citation

Vollestad J, Nielsen MB, Nielsen GH. Mindfulness- and acceptance-based interventions for anxiety disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Clin Psychol. 2012 Sep;51(3):239-60. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.2011.02024.x. Epub 2011 Sep 9. — View Citation

Zich JM, Attkisson CC, Greenfield TK. Screening for depression in primary care clinics: the CES-D and the BDI. Int J Psychiatry Med. 1990;20(3):259-77. doi: 10.2190/LYKR-7VHP-YJEM-MKM2. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Change in Burnout	1. Differences in Burnout scale between time points; The Burnout Scale has been validated by Trockel et al. (2018).It is composed of two subscales (emotional exhaustion containing 4 questions and interpersonal disengagement containing 6 questions.) Both scales are scored on a Likert scale of 0 to 4 ("not at all" to "extremely"). For total Burnout score, the scores of the combined scale (10 total) are averaged. The higher scores indicate higher levels of overall burnout. Individual subscale means will also be computed (with higher scores indicating higher amounts of emotional exhaustion and interpersonal disengagement. Difference in overall burnout measured at four time points (week 1 and 6 of the intervention and 3 & 6 months post intervention) will be reported and compared. The composite scales take approximately 2 minutes to complete.	Four time points (week 1 and 6 of intervention, and 3 & 6 month post intervention)
Secondary	Change in Anxiety	1. Differences in GAD-7 between time points.; The Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 is a well validated seven-item self-administered questionnaire used to measure anxiety. It has 7 questions with Likert scores ranging from "not at all" (score 0), "several days" (score 1), "more than half the days" (score 2), and "nearly every day (score 3). Scores range from 0 to 21 with higher scores indicating higher levels of anxiety, and a cutoff of or above 10 representing high likelihood of generalized anxiety disorder. Differences in GAD-7 measured at four time points (week 1 and 6 of the intervention and 3 & 6 months post intervention) will be reported and compared. The scale takes approximately 2 minutes.	Four time points (week 1 and 6 of intervention, and 3 & 6 month post intervention)
Secondary	Change in Depression	1. Differences in CES-D between time points.; The Center for Epidemiological Studies - Depression scale is a well validated self-administered questionnaire used to measure depression. The 20 item scale has Likert scores ranging from "rarely or none of the time" (score 0), "some or little of the time" (score 1), "moderate or much of the time" (score 2), and "most or almost all the time" (score 3). Scores range from 0 to 60 with higher scores indicated greater depressive symptoms. A cut off at or above 20 has sensitivity 79% and specificity of 80% for major depression. Difference in CES-D in 2019 measured at four time points (week 1 and 6 of the intervention and 3 & 6 month post intervention) will be reported and compared. The scale takes approximately 5 minutes to complete.	Four time points (week 1 and 6 of intervention, and 3 & 6 month post intervention)
Secondary	Change in Perceived Health	1. Differences in GSRH between time points.; A single item of the Health Related Quality of Life - 4 questionnaire "In general, would you say your health is Excellent (score 1), Very Good (score 2), Good (score 3), Fair (score 4), or Poor (score 5), the general self-rated health (GSRH), is a strong predictor of future health care utilization and mortality. It also has excellent validity. Higher scores of the GSRH are related to higher health care expenditures. Difference in GSRH measured at four time points (week 1 and 6 of the intervention and 3 & 6 month post intervention) will be reported and compared. The scale takes less than 1 minute to complete.	Four time points (week 1 and 6 of intervention, and 3 & 6 month post intervention)
Secondary	Change in compassion	1. Differences in compassion scores between time points.; The 12 item Self-Compassion Scale - Short Form is strongly validated scale to measure self-compassion or "the ability to hold one's feelings of suffering with a sense of warmth, connection and concern". Higher levels of self-compassion are associated with less depression and anxiety. Five-point Likert score are from 1 ("Almost Never") to 5 ("Almost Always"). Total score is computed by reverse scoring negative items of self-judgement, isolation and over-identification (ie 1=5, 2=4, 3=3, 4=2, 5=1) and computing total mean. Difference in Compassion measured at four time points (week 1 and 6 of the intervention, and 3 & 6 month post intervention) will be reported and compared. The scale takes approximately 5-10 minutes to complete.	Four time points (week 1 and 6 of intervention, and 3 & 6 months post intervention)