Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to test whether artificial skin graft can substitute autologous skin graft in current burn treatment. The main question it aims to answer is: • Can artificial skin graft result in better wound healing compared to the current burn treatment; autologous skin graft? You will: - Undergo debridement surgery - Receive artificial skin graft as an alternative to autologous skin graft - Undergo biopsy procedure of burn area If there is a comparison group: Researchers will compare autologous skin graft group to see the wound healing process


Clinical Trial Description

Burn caused by working accidents occurs mostly in the male population of productive age (68.68%). Up to this date, the only treatment for grade 2B-3 burns patients in Indonesia is skin transplantation taken from their own body (autologous skin graft). This treatment has several drawbacks in which repeated surgery is sometimes necessary, the source of skin in patients with wide area of burn is limited, and patients that are in the elder age and have comorbidities have high mortality risk. In order to find an alternative for autologous skin graft therapy, a combination of tissue engineering and stem cell therapy is used to invent an artificial skin graft. The present study attempts to evaluate the efficacy of artificial skin graft seeded with autologous keratinocyte and stem cells towards wound healing in burn patients. The artificial graft used in this study is amnion bilayer; a graft that was decellularized to remove donor's cells and then layered to form into 3-D. To evaluate the efficacy, biopsies are taken from the burn area of patients to evaluate the histoarchitecture of patients' tissue by histological staining (H&E and Movat's pentachrome, IHC collagen I, collagen III, vWF, and alpha-SMA) and measure the relative gene expression by qPCR. For clinical data, burn area calculation using Rule of 9 method and thermography measurement using FLIRONE. Furthermore, systemic evaluation of patients are done by monitoring the procalcitonin, lactate, mean arterial pressure, gradation of wound, and sensory of burn area. The evaluation and measurement mentioned above are then compared to patients treated with the current available therapy; autologous skin graft. The artificial skin graft is hoped to result in equal, if not better, wound healing in burn patients compared to autologous skin graft. The investigators hope that artificial skin graft can be an option, other than autologous skin graft, in treating burn patients in the future. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT05652816
Study type Interventional
Source Indonesia University
Contact
Status Recruiting
Phase Early Phase 1
Start date September 6, 2022
Completion date December 31, 2024

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Not yet recruiting NCT06440239 - A Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy in Patients With Burn(s) Phase 1/Phase 2
Recruiting NCT06223269 - Safety and Efficacy of realSKIN® to Provide Complete Wound Closure of Burn Wounds as an Alternative to Autografting Phase 3
Recruiting NCT04685577 - Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Nefopam Cream in Burn Patients Phase 2
Completed NCT05612867 - Low Dose Vitamin C in Burns >20% Compared to Previous Studies With High Dose Vitamin C
Completed NCT04772573 - The Treatment Challenges and Limitation in High-Voltage Pediatric Electrical Burn at Rural Area
Completed NCT04200053 - The Effect of Reflexology Massage and Passive Music Therapy Intervention Before Burn Dressing N/A