Neurobiology of Bulimia Nervosa

Bulimia Nervosa Clinical Trial

Official title:

Ovarian Hormones, Reward Response, and Binge Eating in Bulimia Nervosa: An Experimental Design

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT04225221
• Other study ID #: 19-2343
• Secondary ID: R21MH121726
• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 2
• Start date: February 24, 2020
• Est. completion date: April 4, 2022

Study information

• Verified date: June 2022
• Source: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This pilot study experimentally manipulates ovarian hormones to examine the direct impact of estrogen (E2) and progesterone (P4) on binge eating symptom burden and the behavioral reward response in women with bulimia nervosa (n=15). This is completed by taking medications that change ovarian hormone levels. This line of research could lead to the development of pharmacological interventions developed to target specific areas of the brain, brain receptors, or pathways identified to be involved in the mechanism underlying ovarian hormone change and binge eating.

Description:

Eating disorders (EDs) affect 15 million women in the United States and have one of the highest mortality rates of any mental illness. Despite this, the underlying neurobiology remains poorly understood. EDs predominantly occur in women, and the frequency of certain symptoms change in a predictable pattern over the menstrual cycle; specifically, symptom changes appear to be triggered by normal fluctuations in the ovarian hormones estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4).

The objective of this study is to examine the direct and mechanistic role of E2 and P4 on binge eating in women with bulimia nervosa (BN; n = 15). The experimental design parallels an established design developed to determine the hormonal triggers of premenstrual dysphoric disorder and depression: temporarily stopping the menstrual cycle using a Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist (Lupron) and addback E2 and P4 independently in a double-blind crossover design. The overarching hypothesis is that BN represents a hormone-sensitive phenotype, and this sensitivity is modulated by E2's effects on aspects of the reward response such that reward-motivated behaviors increase in the context of low E2. This line of research will provide direction for future research addressing neuroendocrine, neurobiological, and brain activity and function in BN. To date, there are no medications that have been developed specifically for the treatment of individuals with BN.

Our specific aims are to:

Aim 1: Quantify the direct effect of E2 and P4 on binge eating in women with BN.

Aim 2: Determine the effect of E2 on reward response in women with BN.

Aim 3: Examine the association between reward response and binge eating before and after E2 addback.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 10
• Est. completion date: April 4, 2022
• Est. primary completion date: April 4, 2022
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Female
• Age group: 18 Years to 42 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria

Participants will be women aged 18-42 with a current DSM-5 bulimia nervosa (BN) diagnosis who meet the below criteria. Only participants capable of giving informed consent and understanding the risks associated with the study will be enrolled.

• A regular menstrual cycle for at least three months

• < 35 BMI > 18.5

• Free of medication or medical condition that impacts ovarian hormones or is contraindicated for use with study interventions (including birth control pills)

• Speaks English

Exclusion Criteria

Patients will not be permitted to enter this protocol if they have any of the following:

• peanut allergy

• bipolar or psychotic disorder;

• current substance use disorder or frequent binge drinking behavior;

• frequent diuretic or laxative use, ipecac use;

• currently smoking > 10 cigarettes daily;

• history of a suicide attempt or current suicidal ideation;

• endometriosis;

• abnormal genital/vaginal bleeding;

• undiagnosed enlargement of the ovaries;

• liver disease;

• breast cancer;

• personal history of blood clots (a history of blood clots in the legs or lungs; DVT); pregnancy related blood clots

• history of seizures or epilepsy;

• porphyria;

• diabetes mellitus;

• malignant melanoma;

• gallbladder or pancreatic disease;

• heart or kidney disease;

• cerebrovascular disease (stroke);

• history of osteoporosis or osteopenia;

• recurrent migraine with aura;

• first degree relative (immediate family) with premenopausal breast cancer or breast cancer presenting in both breasts or any woman who has multiple family members (greater than three relatives) with postmenopausal breast cancer will also be excluded from participating in this protocol;

• Refusal to use non-hormonal contraception throughout study;

• Pregnant women will be excluded from participation (patients will be warned not to become pregnant during the study and will be advised to employ barrier contraceptive methods), and women who become pregnant (although unlikely because of the hormone manipulation) will be withdrawn;

• Any condition or symptoms considered by the study team to detrimentally impact subject safety.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Bulimia
• Bulimia Nervosa

Intervention

Drug:
• Estradiol
During estradiol administration, 2mg of estradiol is given twice daily via oral capsule.
• Micronized progesterone
During progesterone administration, 200mg of progesterone is given twice daily via oral capsule.
• Leuprolide Acetate
Initial 3.75 mg intramuscular injection administered approximately Day 6 of menstrual cycle and then monthly thereafter for a total of 3 months.
• Placebo Oral Capsule
Placebo is administered during the addback phase when participants are not taking active medication. Placebo is given so that medication administration occurs throughout the entire 8-week addback period in order to blind participants to when and for how long they are on the active medication.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill	Chapel Hill	North Carolina

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill	National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (37)

Baker JH, Girdler SS, Bulik CM. The role of reproductive hormones in the development and maintenance of eating disorders. Expert Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Nov 1;7(6):573-583. — View Citation

Barth C, Villringer A, Sacher J. Sex hormones affect neurotransmitters and shape the adult female brain during hormonal transition periods. Front Neurosci. 2015 Feb 20;9:37. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00037. eCollection 2015. Review. — View Citation

Ben Dor R, Harsh VL, Fortinsky P, Koziol DE, Rubinow DR, Schmidt PJ. Effects of pharmacologically induced hypogonadism on mood and behavior in healthy young women. Am J Psychiatry. 2013 Apr;170(4):426-33. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12010117. — View Citation

Berman KF, Schmidt PJ, Rubinow DR, Danaceau MA, Van Horn JD, Esposito G, Ostrem JL, Weinberger DR. Modulation of cognition-specific cortical activity by gonadal steroids: a positron-emission tomography study in women. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Aug 5;94(16):8836-41. — View Citation

Bloch M, Rubinow DR, Schmidt PJ, Lotsikas A, Chrousos GP, Cizza G. Cortisol response to ovine corticotropin-releasing hormone in a model of pregnancy and parturition in euthymic women with and without a history of postpartum depression. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005 Feb;90(2):695-9. Epub 2004 Nov 16. — View Citation

Bloch M, Schmidt PJ, Danaceau M, Murphy J, Nieman L, Rubinow DR. Effects of gonadal steroids in women with a history of postpartum depression. Am J Psychiatry. 2000 Jun;157(6):924-30. — View Citation

Bourgain C, Devroey P, Van Waesberghe L, Smitz J, Van Steirteghem AC. Effects of natural progesterone on the morphology of the endometrium in patients with primary ovarian failure. Hum Reprod. 1990 Jul;5(5):537-43. — View Citation

Damario MA, Hammitt DG, Galanits TM, Session DR, Dumesic DA. Pronuclear stage cryopreservation after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and conventional IVF: implications for timing of the freeze. Fertil Steril. 1999 Dec;72(6):1049-54. Erratum in: Fertil Steril 2000 Apr;73(4):874. — View Citation

Edler C, Lipson SF, Keel PK. Ovarian hormones and binge eating in bulimia nervosa. Psychol Med. 2007 Jan;37(1):131-41. Epub 2006 Oct 12. — View Citation

Fatemi HM, Kolibianakis EM, Camus M, Tournaye H, Donoso P, Papanikolaou E, Devroey P. Addition of estradiol to progesterone for luteal supplementation in patients stimulated with GnRH antagonist/rFSH for IVF: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2006 Oct;21(10):2628-32. Epub 2006 Jul 20. — View Citation

Forbush KT, Wildes JE, Pollack LO, Dunbar D, Luo J, Patterson K, Petruzzi L, Pollpeter M, Miller H, Stone A, Bright A, Watson D. Development and validation of the Eating Pathology Symptoms Inventory (EPSI). Psychol Assess. 2013 Sep;25(3):859-78. doi: 10.1037/a0032639. Epub 2013 Jul 1. — View Citation

Frank GK. Advances from neuroimaging studies in eating disorders. CNS Spectr. 2015 Aug;20(4):391-400. doi: 10.1017/S1092852915000012. Epub 2015 Apr 23. Review. — View Citation

Franken IH, Muris P, Georgieva I. Gray's model of personality and addiction. Addict Behav. 2006 Mar;31(3):399-403. Epub 2005 Jun 16. — View Citation

Friedler S, Raziel A, Schachter M, Strassburger D, Bukovsky I, Ron-El R. Luteal support with micronized progesterone following in-vitro fertilization using a down-regulation protocol with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist: a comparative study between vaginal and oral administration. Hum Reprod. 1999 Aug;14(8):1944-8. — View Citation

Harrison A, O'Brien N, Lopez C, Treasure J. Sensitivity to reward and punishment in eating disorders. Psychiatry Res. 2010 May 15;177(1-2):1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2009.06.010. Epub 2010 Apr 9. Review. — View Citation

Humaidan P, Bredkjaer HE, Bungum L, Bungum M, Grøndahl ML, Westergaard L, Andersen CY. GnRH agonist (buserelin) or hCG for ovulation induction in GnRH antagonist IVF/ICSI cycles: a prospective randomized study. Hum Reprod. 2005 May;20(5):1213-20. Epub 2005 Mar 10. — View Citation

Klump KL, Fowler N, Mayhall L, Sisk CL, Culbert KM, Burt SA. Estrogen moderates genetic influences on binge eating during puberty: Disruption of normative processes? J Abnorm Psychol. 2018 Jul;127(5):458-470. doi: 10.1037/abn0000352. Epub 2018 Jun 21. — View Citation

Klump KL, Keel PK, Culbert KM, Edler C. Ovarian hormones and binge eating: exploring associations in community samples. Psychol Med. 2008 Dec;38(12):1749-57. doi: 10.1017/S0033291708002997. Epub 2008 Feb 29. — View Citation

Knutson B, Westdorp A, Kaiser E, Hommer D. FMRI visualization of brain activity during a monetary incentive delay task. Neuroimage. 2000 Jul;12(1):20-7. — View Citation

Lee EE, Nieman LK, Martinez PE, Harsh VL, Rubinow DR, Schmidt PJ. ACTH and cortisol response to Dex/CRH testing in women with and without premenstrual dysphoria during GnRH agonist-induced hypogonadism and ovarian steroid replacement. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Jun;97(6):1887-96. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-3451. Epub 2012 Mar 30. — View Citation

Lester NA, Keel PK, Lipson SF. Symptom fluctuation in bulimia nervosa: relation to menstrual-cycle phase and cortisol levels. Psychol Med. 2003 Jan;33(1):51-60. — View Citation

Lukaszuk K, Liss J, Lukaszuk M, Maj B. Optimization of estradiol supplementation during the luteal phase improves the pregnancy rate in women undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles. Fertil Steril. 2005 May;83(5):1372-6. — View Citation

Mac Neil BA, Hudson CC, Dempsey K, Nadkarni P. A case of symptom relapse post placement of intrauterine device (IUD) in a patient with bulimia nervosa: consequence or coincidence. Eat Weight Disord. 2017 Jun;22(2):369-372. doi: 10.1007/s40519-017-0391-z. Epub 2017 Apr 24. — View Citation

Misra M, Katzman DK, Estella NM, Eddy KT, Weigel T, Goldstein MA, Miller KK, Klibanski A. Impact of physiologic estrogen replacement on anxiety symptoms, body shape perception, and eating attitudes in adolescent girls with anorexia nervosa: data from a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Psychiatry. 2013 Aug;74(8):e765-71. doi: 10.4088/JCP.13m08365. — View Citation

Mitwally MF, Gotlieb L, Casper RF. Prevention of bone loss and hypoestrogenic symptoms by estrogen and interrupted progestogen add-back in long-term GnRH-agonist down-regulated patients with endometriosis and premenstrual syndrome. Menopause. 2002 Jul-Aug;9(4):236-41. — View Citation

Naessén S, Carlström K, Byström B, Pierre Y, Hirschberg AL. Effects of an antiandrogenic oral contraceptive on appetite and eating behavior in bulimic women. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2007 Jun;32(5):548-54. Epub 2007 May 2. — View Citation

Nobles CJ, Thomas JJ, Valentine SE, Gerber MW, Vaewsorn AS, Marques L. Association of premenstrual syndrome and premenstrual dysphoric disorder with bulimia nervosa and binge-eating disorder in a nationally representative epidemiological sample. Int J Eat Disord. 2016 Jul;49(7):641-50. doi: 10.1002/eat.22539. Epub 2016 May 20. — View Citation

Price WA, Torem MS, DiMarzio LR. Premenstrual exacerbation of bulimia. Psychosomatics. 1987 Jul;28(7):378-9. — View Citation

Rice VC, Richard-Davis G, Saleh AA, Ginsburg KA, Mammen EF, Moghissi K, Leach R. Fibrinolytic parameters in women undergoing ovulation induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Dec;169(6):1549-53. — View Citation

Richard JE, López-Ferreras L, Anderberg RH, Olandersson K, Skibicka KP. Estradiol is a critical regulator of food-reward behavior. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2017 Apr;78:193-202. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2017.01.014. Epub 2017 Jan 28. — View Citation

Roca CA, Schmidt PJ, Deuster PA, Danaceau MA, Altemus M, Putnam K, Chrousos GP, Nieman LK, Rubinow DR. Sex-related differences in stimulated hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis during induced gonadal suppression. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005 Jul;90(7):4224-31. Epub 2005 May 10. Erratum in: J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005 Sep;90(9):5522. Roca, Catherine A [added]; Schmidt, Peter J [added]; Deuster, Patricia A [added]; Danaceau, Merry A [added]; Altemus, Margaret [added]. — View Citation

Schmidt PJ, Martinez PE, Nieman LK, Koziol DE, Thompson KD, Schenkel L, Wakim PG, Rubinow DR. Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder Symptoms Following Ovarian Suppression: Triggered by Change in Ovarian Steroid Levels But Not Continuous Stable Levels. Am J Psychiatry. 2017 Oct 1;174(10):980-989. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.16101113. Epub 2017 Apr 21. — View Citation

Schmidt PJ, Nieman LK, Danaceau MA, Adams LF, Rubinow DR. Differential behavioral effects of gonadal steroids in women with and in those without premenstrual syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1998 Jan 22;338(4):209-16. — View Citation

Schmidt PJ, Steinberg EM, Negro PP, Haq N, Gibson C, Rubinow DR. Pharmacologically induced hypogonadism and sexual function in healthy young women and men. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2009 Feb;34(3):565-76. doi: 10.1038/npp.2008.24. Epub 2008 Mar 19. Erratum in: Neuropsychopharmacology. 2009 Feb;34(3):816. — View Citation

Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Willett WC, Manson JE, Rosner B, Speizer FE, Hennekens CH. Postmenopausal estrogen therapy and cardiovascular disease. Ten-year follow-up from the nurses' health study. N Engl J Med. 1991 Sep 12;325(11):756-62. — View Citation

Wyatt KM, Dimmock PW, Ismail KM, Jones PW, O'Brien PM. The effectiveness of GnRHa with and without 'add-back' therapy in treating premenstrual syndrome: a meta analysis. BJOG. 2004 Jun;111(6):585-93. Review. — View Citation

Yoest KE, Cummings JA, Becker JB. Estradiol, dopamine and motivation. Cent Nerv Syst Agents Med Chem. 2014;14(2):83-9. Review. — View Citation

* Note: There are 37 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Change in Binge Eating Sum Score	Binge eating will be measured using the 8-item binge eating subscale of the Eating Pathology Symptoms Inventory (EPSI), which measures features of binge eating (e.g., consumption of large quantities of food, mindless eating) on a 5-point Likert scale from "never" to "very often." The EPSI scale is designed to assess behavior over the past 28 days; however, to be sensitive to the timeframe of the present study, the instructions will be modified to ask participants to consider the past week. Items are summed for a scale score ranging from 0-32. Higher scores indicate more frequent experiences with binge eating behavior. Change is defined by an average change score.	Baseline (Day 14 of baseline) to End of Intervention (Day 14 of each intervention)
Primary	Change in Weekly Average Binge-eating Frequency	Binge eating frequency is based on a daily diary of self-reported binge eating frequency. Scores can range from 0 to infinity as they represent a self-reported frequency. Subjects self-report the number of binge eating episodes they had each day. Higher numbers indicate more frequent binge eating episodes. Average weekly frequency will be determined based on daily reported binge eating frequency. Change is defined by an average change score.	Baseline (Day 14 of baseline) to End of Intervention (Day 14 of each intervention)
Primary	Change in Self-Reported Reward Sensitivity Subscale Score During Estradiol Manipulation	Sensitivity to Punishment/Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire will be used to measure reward sensitivity during estradiol intervention. The reward sensitivity subscale will be used, which is rated on a true/false scale with scores ranging 0-24. Higher scores indicate more sensitivity to reward. Change is defined by an average change score.	Baseline (Day 14 of baseline) to End of Intervention (Day 14 of intervention)
Primary	Change in Response Latency to Reward During the Monetary Incentive Delay Task During Estradiol Manipulation	Time (ms) between stimulus and response will be measured during the Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) task during the win trials during the estradiol intervention. During the MID task, participants need to select the correct response during "win" and "lose" conditions by pressing a button. Higher scores indicate a longer response time to the win trials. Change is defined by an average change score.	Baseline (Day 14 of baseline) to End of Intervention (Day 14 of intervention)
Primary	Change in Delay Discounting Parameter k Using the Monetary Choice Questionnaire With Estradiol Manipulation	During the estradiol intervention, participants will be asked to make a series of hypothetical choices between small, sooner (impulsive) vs. larger, later (self controlled) hypothetical monetary outcomes. k is a hyperbolic function with larger k values indicating more valuation of a larger delayed reward and smaller values indicating preference for more immediate, smaller rewards (more impulsivity). Change is defined as the average change in k.	Baseline (Day 14 of baseline) to End of Intervention (Day 14 of intervention)
Primary	Change in Self-Reported Behavioral Inhibition Score During Estradiol Manipulation	This measures assesses individual disposition toward avoidance of activities during the estradiol intervention. The Behavioural Inhibition subscale of the Behavioural Inhibition Scale/Behavioral Activation Scale (BIS/BAS) assesses behavioural inhibition (BI) using participant self-reports. The minimum score on the BIS subscale is 7, maximum 28. Greater scores indicate greater behavioural inhibition. Change is defined by an average change score	Baseline (Day 14 of baseline) to End of Intervention (Day 14 of intervention)
Primary	Change in Behavioral Activation Score During Estradiol Manipulation	This measures assesses individual disposition toward engaging in activities during the estradiol intervention. Two BIS/BAS behavioural activation (BA) subscales will be used. The BA subscales used are Fun Seeking and Drive. Each subscale is summed to get the respective subscale scores. The minimum score on BA Fun Seeking and BA Drive are minimum 4 and maximum 16. Higher scores indicate greater behavioral activation. Change is defined by an average change score.	Baseline (Day 14 of baseline) to End of Intervention (Day 14 of intervention)
Primary	Change in Behavioral Activation Reward Responsiveness With Estradiol Manipulation	This measures assesses individual disposition toward avoiding and engaging in activities during estradiol intervention. The BIS/BAS reward responsiveness subscale will be used. The minimum score on the BA Reward Responsiveness subscale is 5, maximum 20. Higher scores indicate greater reward responsiveness. Change is defined by an average change score.	Baseline (Day 14 of baseline) to End of Intervention (Day 14 of intervention)
Primary	Change in Behavioral Inhibition During Estradiol Administration as Assessed Through a Behavioral Task	Behavioral response inhibition will be examined during a go/no-go computerized task during the estradiol intervention. Inhibitory control is defined by the response accuracy of the go no/go trials. Percent of errors is calculated as the number of "go" responses on a "no/go" trial" divided by the total number of "no/go" trials." Fewer errors ("go" response on a "no/go" trial) indicates better inhibitory control. Change is defined by an average change score.	Baseline (Day 14 of baseline) to End of Intervention (Day 14 of intervention)
Primary	Correlation Between Change in Reward Response and Change in Binge Eating Before and During Estradiol Manipulation	Pearson correlations between change in self-reported reward response and change in binge eating between baseline and estradiol intervention will be examined. Binge eating is defined as the sum score from the Eating Pathology Symptom Inventory (EPSI). Self-reported reward response is defined as the BAS reward responsiveness subscale score and the Sensitivity to Reward/Sensitivity to Punishment Questionnaire (SPSRQ) sensitivity to reward subscale score. Change in binge eating and change in reward response between baseline and estradiol intervention was calculated and a correlation conducted between change scores.	Baseline (Day 14 of baseline) to End of Intervention (Day 14 of intervention)