Rapid Response to Day Hospital Treatment in Bulimia Nervosa and Purging Disorder

Bulimia Nervosa Clinical Trial

— CBT-RR  

Official title:

Rapid Response to Day Hospital Treatment in Bulimia Nervosa and Purging Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Intervention to Facilitate Early Symptom Change

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT02444065
• Other study ID #: 14-7391-B
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• First received: April 23, 2015
• Last updated: May 13, 2016
• Start date: May 2014
• Est. completion date: March 2016

Study information

• Verified date: May 2016
• Source: University Health Network, Toronto
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: Canada: Institutional Review Board
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Treatments for bulimia nervosa (BN) have relatively high rates of nonremission and relapse, meaning that improving treatments is a high priority in this area. Rapid response to treatment -cessation of binge eating and vomiting symptoms within the first weeks of treatment - is a robust predictor of improved post-treatment outcomes and lower relapse rates, but no study has tried to facilitate rapid response as a means of improving treatment outcomes. The present study responds to this gap in the literature by testing a 4-session CBT-based individual intervention for rapid response (i.e., "CBT-RR"), designed to augment standard day hospital (DH) treatment for BN and Purging Disorder (PD) by focusing on strategies and skills for rapid symptom interruption. CBT-RR will be compared to a matched-intensity augmentative motivational interviewing (MI) intervention. Participants will be recruited from a hospital-based day program for eating disorders, and will be randomly assigned to one of the two conditions in addition to the DH as usual. participants will be assessed at pre-intervention, post-intervention, week 4 of DH, post-DH, and 6 months follow-up. It is hypothesized that compared to those who receive MI, patients who receive CBT-RR will be more likely to exhibit a rapid response to day hospital treatment (i.e., </= 3 binge eating and/or vomiting episodes in the first 4 weeks). It is further hypothesized that patients who receive CBT-RR will exhibit fewer binge eating and/or vomiting episodes at post-DH and at 6-month follow-up. Potential mediators and moderators of these hypothesized treatment effects will be examined on an exploratory basis, including self-efficacy, motivation, and hope (potential mediators), and emotion regulation, depression, cognitive psychopathology of eating disorders, and working alliance with the therapist (potential moderators).

Description:

Cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) is the most empirically supported treatment for bulimia nervosa (BN) and related disorders, yet approximately 1/3 of completers do not remit, there is a substantial treatment attrition rate, and 1/3 of remitted patients will relapse within the first 2 years. Improving CBT is an important research prerogative. Motivational interviewing (MI) is an augmentative intervention that has been investigated to improve CBT, but reviews indicate that it is not efficacious with eating disorders. The failure of MI with eating disorders has led to consideration that focusing on early behaviour change might be a more productive therapeutic strategy. Rapid response to treatment for eating disorders has been reliably identified as a prognostic indicator in eating disorders. For BN and similar disorders, rapid response is the rapid reduction of binge eating, vomiting, and dietary restriction during the first few weeks of treatment. Numerous studies have indicated that patients who rapidly respond to treatment are significantly more likely to be remitted at post treatment and significantly less likely to relapse, compared to those who respond more slowly. No preexisting clinical, demographic, personality or other factors have clearly emerged to account for this effect. Given that rapid response has clear prognostic importance, and given that research has failed to identify mechanisms driving this finding, this study seeks to determine whether rapid response can be facilitated clinically using a targeted intervention designed to provide patients with specific behavioural skills to decrease their bulimic symptoms rapidly. Improving remission and relapse rates is a high priority in the eating disorders research field. the investigators already know that cognitive and behavioural strategies have efficacy for eating disorders, but existing treatments need improvement. Rapid response is an area that has been frequently described and has clear prognostic importance and no clear mechanism accounting for why some patients rapidly respond, suggesting that perhaps rapid response could be facilitated if patients are provided with the skills, mindset, and support to do so. However, no study to date has sought to answer this question and determine whether rapid response can be facilitated in order to improve patient prognoses. Thus, this study seeks to examine whether rapid response to day hospital treatment can be facilitated clinically using an augmentative CBT based intervention targeting early symptom change. The CBT intervention will be compared to a matched-intensity motivational interviewing (MI) intervention. The rationale for using MI is because MI is frequently used to augment standard treatments, it provides an active treatment comparison, and because the rationale for the present study emerged partly from research aimed at understanding some of the limitations of MI in treating eating disorders. Thus, MI provides a theoretically-driven comparison group. It is predicted that individuals who receive CBT (versus MI) will be more likely to be classified as rapid responders, and will have fewer bulimic symptoms at post-day hospital and 6-month follow-up. As well, it is hypothesized that changes in self-efficacy, motivation, or hopefulness may help to account for these findings.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 44
• Est. completion date: March 2016
• Est. primary completion date: March 2016
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Both
• Age group: 17 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Diagnosis of bulimia nervosa or other specified feeding and eating disorder (OSFED) purging disorder

• Body mass index of 19.0 or higher

• Has accepted day hospital eating disorder treatment at the Toronto General Hospital Eating Disorder Day Hospital Program

• No previous treatments at the Toronto General Hospital Eating Disorder Day Hospital Program in the previous 5 years

• Can read and write English fluently.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Current imminent suicidality

• Current manic episode

• Current psychosis

• Current medical instability as assessed by program medical team.

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Bulimia
• Bulimia Nervosa
• Eating Disorder

Intervention

Behavioral:
• Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)
The CBT intervention is a 4 session (1 hour each) individual psychotherapy intervention that uses a manualized treatment protocol developed by the investigators. It uses standard CBT for eating disorders interventions, including orientation to the CBT model, psychoeducation, commitment and goal setting, behavioral strategies for normalizing eating and reducing bulimic symptoms, planning, and homework. 1-2 sessions are delivered before starting day hospital treatment, and the remaining sessions are delivered in the first weeks of day hospital.
• Motivational Interviewing (MI)
The MI intervention is a 4 session (1 hour each) individual psychotherapy intervention that uses a manualized treatment protocol (Carter & Bewell-Weiss, 2012). It uses standard MI for eating disorders interventions, including decisional balance, exploring values, readiness and confidence rules, and MI communication strategies. 1-2 sessions are delivered before starting day hospital treatment, and the remaining sessions are delivered in the first weeks of day hospital.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Canada	Toronto General Hospital, Eating Disorder Program	Toronto	Ontario

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
University Health Network, Toronto	Ryerson University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Canada, 

References & Publications (28)

Agras WS, Crow SJ, Halmi KA, Mitchell JE, Wilson GT, Kraemer HC. Outcome predictors for the cognitive behavior treatment of bulimia nervosa: data from a multisite study. Am J Psychiatry. 2000 Aug;157(8):1302-8. — View Citation

Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Beck Depression Inventory-II. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.

Bégin C, Gagnon-Girouard MP, Aimé A, Ratté C. Trajectories of eating and clinical symptoms over the course of a day hospital program for eating disorders. Eat Disord. 2013;21(3):249-64. doi: 10.1080/10640266.2013.779188. — View Citation

Bulik CM, Sullivan PF, Carter FA, McIntosh VV, Joyce PR. Predictors of rapid and sustained response to cognitive-behavioral therapy for bulimia nervosa. Int J Eat Disord. 1999 Sep;26(2):137-44. — View Citation

Byrne SM, Fursland A, Allen KL, Watson H. The effectiveness of enhanced cognitive behavioural therapy for eating disorders: an open trial. Behav Res Ther. 2011 Apr;49(4):219-26. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2011.01.006. Epub 2011 Jan 27. — View Citation

Fairburn CG, Cooper Z, Doll HA, O'Connor ME, Bohn K, Hawker DM, Wales JA, Palmer RL. Transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral therapy for patients with eating disorders: a two-site trial with 60-week follow-up. Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Mar;166(3):311-9. doi: 10. — View Citation

Geller J, Brown KE, Srikameswaran S, Piper W, Dunn EC. The psychometric properties of the Readiness and Motivation Questionnaire: a symptom-specific measure of readiness for change in the eating disorders. Psychol Assess. 2013 Sep;25(3):759-68. doi: 10.10 — View Citation

Gratz, K. L., & Roemer, L. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assess

Grilo CM, Masheb RM. Rapid response predicts binge eating and weight loss in binge eating disorder: findings from a controlled trial of orlistat with guided self-help cognitive behavioral therapy. Behav Res Ther. 2007 Nov;45(11):2537-50. Epub 2007 Jun 7. — View Citation

Horvath, A. O., & Greenberg, L. S. (1989). Development and validation of the Working Alliance Inventory. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 36, 223-233. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.36.2.223

Knowles L, Anokhina A, Serpell L. Motivational interventions in the eating disorders: what is the evidence? Int J Eat Disord. 2013 Mar;46(2):97-107. doi: 10.1002/eat.22053. Epub 2012 Sep 24. Review. — View Citation

MacDonald DE, Trottier K, McFarlane T, Olmsted MP. Empirically defining rapid response to intensive treatment to maximize prognostic utility for bulimia nervosa and purging disorder. Behav Res Ther. 2015 May;68:48-53. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2015.03.007. Epub — View Citation

Macdonald P, Hibbs R, Corfield F, Treasure J. The use of motivational interviewing in eating disorders: a systematic review. Psychiatry Res. 2012 Nov 30;200(1):1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.05.013. Epub 2012 Jun 18. Review. — View Citation

Masheb RM, Grilo CM. Rapid response predicts treatment outcomes in binge eating disorder: implications for stepped care. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2007 Aug;75(4):639-44. — View Citation

McFarlane T, Olmsted MP, Trottier K. Timing and prediction of relapse in a transdiagnostic eating disorder sample. Int J Eat Disord. 2008 Nov;41(7):587-93. doi: 10.1002/eat.20550. — View Citation

McFarlane TL, MacDonald DE, Royal S, Olmsted MP. Rapid and slow responders to eating disorder treatment: a comparison on clinically relevant variables. Int J Eat Disord. 2013 Sep;46(6):563-6. doi: 10.1002/eat.22136. Epub 2013 Apr 12. — View Citation

Olmsted MP, Kaplan AS, Rockert W, Jacobsen M. Rapid responders to intensive treatment of bulimia nervosa. Int J Eat Disord. 1996 Apr;19(3):279-85. — View Citation

Olmsted MP, Kaplan AS, Rockert W. Rate and prediction of relapse in bulimia nervosa. Am J Psychiatry. 1994 May;151(5):738-43. — View Citation

Olmsted MP, MacDonald DE, McFarlane T, Trottier K, Colton P. Predictors of rapid relapse in bulimia nervosa. Int J Eat Disord. 2015 Apr;48(3):337-40. doi: 10.1002/eat.22380. Epub 2014 Dec 26. — View Citation

Olmsted MP, McFarlane T, Trottier K, Rockert W. Efficacy and intensity of day hospital treatment for eating disorders. Psychother Res. 2013;23(3):277-86. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2012.721937. Epub 2012 Sep 18. — View Citation

Raykos BC, Watson HJ, Fursland A, Byrne SM, Nathan P. Prognostic value of rapid response to enhanced cognitive behavioral therapy in a routine clinic sample of eating disorder outpatients. Int J Eat Disord. 2013 Dec;46(8):764-70. doi: 10.1002/eat.22169. E — View Citation

Thompson-Brenner H, Shingleton RM, Sauer-Zavala S, Richards LK, Pratt EM. Multiple measures of rapid response as predictors of remission in cognitive behavior therapy for bulimia nervosa. Behav Res Ther. 2015 Jan;64:9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2014.11.004. — View Citation

Trottier K, McFarlane T, Olmsted MP, McCabe RE. The Weight Influenced Self-Esteem Questionnaire (WISE-Q): factor structure and psychometric properties. Body Image. 2013 Jan;10(1):112-20. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2012.08.008. Epub 2012 Oct 12. — View Citation

Vaz AR, Conceição E, Machado PP. Early response as a predictor of success in guided self-help treatment for bulimic disorders. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2014 Jan;22(1):59-65. doi: 10.1002/erv.2262. Epub 2013 Oct 4. — View Citation

Waller G. The myths of motivation: time for a fresh look at some received wisdom in the eating disorders? Int J Eat Disord. 2012 Jan;45(1):1-16. doi: 10.1002/eat.20900. Epub 2011 Feb 14. — View Citation

Wilson GT, Fairburn CC, Agras WS, Walsh BT, Kraemer H. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for bulimia nervosa: time course and mechanisms of change. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2002 Apr;70(2):267-74. — View Citation

Zeeck A, Weber S, Sandholz A, Wetzler-Burmeister E, Wirsching M, Hartmann A. Inpatient versus day clinic treatment for bulimia nervosa: a randomized trial. Psychother Psychosom. 2009;78(3):152-60. doi: 10.1159/000206869. Epub 2009 Mar 9. — View Citation

Zunker C, Peterson CB, Cao L, Mitchell JE, Wonderlich SA, Crow S, Crosby RD. A receiver operator characteristics analysis of treatment outcome in binge eating disorder to identify patterns of rapid response. Behav Res Ther. 2010 Dec;48(12):1227-31. doi: 1 — View Citation

* Note: There are 28 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Other	Self-Efficacy	Changes in self-efficacy will be modelled across several time points (baseline, session 2, week 4 of day hospital, and post-day hospital). Changes in self-efficacy from baseline to the 4th week in day hospital treatment will also be examined as a potential mediator of the effects of treatment on rapid response. Self-efficacy will be measured using the Readiness and Motivation Questionnaire (Geller et al., 2013). Day hospital stays are expected to consist of an average of 8 weeks of treatment.	Each of the following: Baseline, Session 2 (on average the week before starting Day Hospital or Day Hospital week 1), Day Hospital Week 4, End of Day hospital (average=8 weeks)	No
Other	Motivation	Changes in motivation will be modelled across several time points (baseline, session 2, week 4 of day hospital, and post-day hospital). Changes in motivation from baseline to the 4th week in day hospital treatment will also be examined as a potential mediator of the effects of treatment on rapid response. Motivation will be measured using the Readiness and Motivation Questionnaire (Geller et al., 2013). Day hospital stays are expected to consist of an average of 8 weeks of treatment.	Each of the following: Baseline, Session 2 (on average the week before starting Day Hospital or Day Hospital week 1), Day Hospital Week 4, End of Day hospital (average=8 weeks)	No
Other	Hope	Changes in hope will be modelled across several time points (baseline, session 2, week 4 of day hospital, and post-day hospital). Changes in hope from baseline to the 4th week in day hospital treatment will also be examined as a potential mediator of the effects of treatment on rapid response. Hope will be measured using an investigator-constructed questionnaire. Day hospital stays are expected to consist of an average of 8 weeks of treatment.	Each of the following: Baseline, Session 2 (on average the week before starting Day Hospital or Day Hospital week 1), Day Hospital Week 4, End of Day hospital (average=8 weeks)	No
Other	Moderator of treatment response - emotion regulation	Emotion regulation skills at baseline will be examined as a potential moderator of treatment response.	Baseline	No
Other	Moderator of treatment response - depression symptoms	Depression symptoms at baseline will be examined as a potential moderator of treatment response.	Baseline	No
Other	Moderator of treatment response - weight-based self-esteem	Weight-based self-esteem at baseline will be examined as a potential moderator of treatment response.	Baseline	No
Other	Moderator of treatment response - working alliance with the therapist	Working alliance with study therapist will be examined as a potential moderator of treatment response.	Week 4	No
Primary	Rapid response to day hospital treatment	Rapid response is a binary outcome variable (yes/no) of early bulimic symptoms. Rapid responders exhibit a total of three or fewer binge and/or vomit and/or laxative episodes in the first four weeks of day hospital treatment for eating disorders.	First 4 weeks of day hospital treatment	No
Primary	Changes in bulimic symptom frequency	Bulimic symptoms (binge eating and/or vomiting and/or laxative use) will be totalled for each 4 week period and changes modelled over time at the following time points: Baseline, first 4 weeks of day hospital, last 4 weeks of day hospital, and months 1-6 in follow-up.	Each of the following: Baseline, first 4 weeks of day hospital, last 4 weeks of day hospital, and months 1-6 in follow-up.	No
Secondary	End-of-Day Hospital Outcome	Outcome is a binary outcome variable, remitted (yes/no). Remitted patients have one or fewer binge and/or vomit and/or laxative episodes in the last 4 weeks of day hospital treatment. Non-remitted patients have 2 or more episodes in this same period. Day hospital stays are expected to consist of an average of 8 weeks of treatment.	Participants will be assessed at end of day hospital stay, an expected average of 8 weeks.	No
Secondary	6-month relapse rate	Relapse is a binary outcome variable (yes/no). Relapsed patients have an average of 4 or more binge and/or vomit and/or laxative use episodes per month for three consecutive months, beginning in the first 6 months after discharge from day hospital program. Non-relapsed patients have bulimic symptoms below this threshold.	6 months after discharge from day hospital	No