Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist vs Proportional Assist Ventilation

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

This study aims to assess whether neurally adjusted ventilatory assist or proportional assist ventilation is more effective in infants born prematurely with evolving or established bronchopulmonary dysplasia

Clinical Trial Description

Despite improvements in survival rates of extremely preterm born infants, the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) remains unchanged over the last two decades. As invasive ventilation is frequently necessary and indeed life saving, numerous ventilator strategies have been developed to reduce damage to the developing lung. Synchronisation of mechanical breaths with the patient's respiratory effort offers the theoretical benefit of improving oxygenation and ventilation, requiring lower ventilator pressures, fewer air leaks and increased patient comfort. Recently, novel modes of ventilation have been introduced that aim to improve upon conventional ventilation. During both proportional assist ventilation (PAV) and neurally-adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA), respiratory support is servo-controlled based on continuous input from the baby's respiratory effort. Both aim to improve synchronization of the timing of the respiratory cycle and also to vary the level of support offered breath-to-breath in proportion to the respiratory effort of the patient. During proportional assist ventilation (PAV), the ventilator can vary inflation pressure in phase with both volume change and flow change in order to offload both elastic and resistive components of the work of breathing. We have previously shown that PAV, compared to ACV, reduces the oxygenation index and improves respiratory muscle strength in infants born prematurely who remain ventilated at or beyond one week of life . Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) utilises the electrical activity of the diaphragm to trigger the ventilator. A modified nasogastric feeding tube with a series of electrodes allows monitoring of the diaphragmatic electromyogram (Edi). The waveform of the Edi is used to trigger and control ventilator support. We have recently shown that NAVA compared to ACV results in a lower oxygenation index in infants born prematurely who remain ventilated at or beyond one week of life. Both PAV and NAVA have been shown to have advantages above conventional triggered ventilation in neonates, but they have not been compared to each other. Our aim is to determine whether NAVA or PAV is more effective in prematurely born neonates with evolving or established BPD. ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT02967549
Study type	Interventional
Source	King's College London
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase	N/A
Start date	November 2016
Completion date	August 2018

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Terminated	`NCT04506619` - Safety and Efficacy Outcomes Following Previously Administered Short-Term Treatment With SHP607 in Extremely Premature Infants
Completed	`NCT04936477` - Ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) Ratio and Alveolar Surface Area in Preterm Infants	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05285345` - Implementation of a Consensus-Based Discharge Protocol for Preterm Infants With Lung Disease
Completed	`NCT03649932` - Enteral L Citrulline Supplementation in Preterm Infants - Safety, Efficacy and Dosing	Phase 1
Terminated	`NCT02524249` - Early Versus Late Caffeine for ELBW Newborns	N/A
Completed	`NCT02249143` - Duration of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and Pulmonary Function Testing in Preterm Infants	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT01632475` - Follow-Up Study of Safety and Efficacy of Pneumostem® in Premature Infants With Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia
Completed	`NCT01460576` - Improving Prematurity-Related Respiratory Outcomes at Vanderbilt	N/A
Completed	`NCT00419588` - Growth of Airways and Lung Tissues in Premature and Healthy Infants
Unknown status	`NCT00254176` - Cysteine Supplementation in Critically Ill Neonates	Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed	`NCT00319956` - Trial II of Lung Protection With Azithromycin in the Preterm Infant	Phase 2
Completed	`NCT00208039` - Pilot Trial of Surfactant Booster Prophylaxis For Ventilated Preterm Neonates	N/A
Completed	`NCT00006401` - Inhaled Nitric Oxide for Preventing Chronic Lung Disease in Premature Infants	Phase 3
Terminated	`NCT05030012` - Maintaining Optimal HVNI Delivery Using Automatic Titration of Oxygen in Preterm Infants	N/A
Completed	`NCT00006058` - Study of the Pathobiology of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia in Newborns	N/A
Completed	`NCT00005376` - Premature Birth and Its Sequelae in Women	N/A
Completed	`NCT00011362` - Dexamethasone Therapy in VLBW Infants at Risk of CLD	Phase 3
Completed	`NCT00004805` - Study of the Effect of Four Methods of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Instruction on Psychosocial Response of Parents With Infants at Risk of Sudden Death	N/A
Completed	`NCT05152316` - The Baby Lung Study
Recruiting	`NCT04821453` - NAVA vs. CMV Crossover in Severe BPD	N/A

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.