Breastfeeding Clinical Trial
Official title:
The Effect of Two Different Breastfeeding Positions on Breastfeeding Self-efficacy, Breastfeeding Success and Postpartum Comfort in Primiparous Mothers.
Breast milk is a natural, unique, ideal food that best meets the nutritional needs of babies for healthy growth and development. Studies clearly demonstrate the short and long-term benefits of breast milk to the baby, mother, family, environment, economy and country with strong evidence. There are many factors that affect breastfeeding. One of these factors is breastfeeding techniques. Proper breastfeeding technique includes holding the baby well and attaching the baby to the breast correctly, and ineffective breastfeeding techniques, incorrect position and holding style cause poor breastfeeding outcomes in mothers. There are many different breastfeeding positions such as cradle position, cross cradle position, football grip position (armpit position), side-lying breastfeeding, biological breastfeeding. It is of great importance to consider in detail the superiority of these positions over each other. Reveal the advantages of different positions will help increase breastfeeding rates and long-term breastfeeding rates. The aim of this study is to reveal which position is more effective in terms of the effects of biological breastfeeding and armpit (football) breastfeeding positions on breastfeeding self-efficacy, breastfeeding success, breastfeeding duration and postpartum comfort. The Hypotheses of the Study Hypothesis 0 (H0): There is no difference between biological breastfeeding and armpit (football) breastfeeding position on breastfeeding success, breastfeeding self-efficacy and postpartum comfort in primiparous mothers. Hypothesis 1 (H1): Breastfeeding success of primiparous mothers in the biological breastfeeding position is higher than in the armpit (football) breastfeeding position. Hypothesis 2 (H2): Breastfeeding self-efficacy of primiparous mothers in the biological breastfeeding position is higher than in the armpit (football) breastfeeding position. Hypothesis 3 (H3): Breastfeeding duration of primiparous mothers in the biological breastfeeding position is higher than in the armpit (Football) breastfeeding position. Hypothesis 4 (H4): Primiparous mothers have higher comfort in the biological breastfeeding position than in the armpit (Football) breastfeeding position.
Status | Not yet recruiting |
Enrollment | 68 |
Est. completion date | November 15, 2024 |
Est. primary completion date | November 15, 2024 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | Female |
Age group | 19 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: Mother's Inclusion Criteria: - Be over the age of 19 - Able to speak Turkish language - Without any communication problems and collaborative - Absence of any complications in pregnancy such as multiple pregnancy, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, ablation placenta. - Having a normal vaginal birth - Having a term and primiparous (singular) baby - Breast milk is not contraindicated to the baby - Absence of nipple problems that will affect breastfeeding - No previous breastfeeding experience Newborn's Inclusion Criteria - Such as craniofacial anomaly such as cleft palate, cleft lip, paralysis of facial muscles, etc. absence of congenital anomalies that would prevent sucking - APGAR score of 7 or higher in the 5th minute - Having "sucking, swallowing and breathing coordination" Exclusion Criteria: Mother's Exclusion Criteria: - Refusal to participate in the study - Not signing the informed consent form - Having a communication problem - Desire to leave at any stage of the study or early discharge - Postpartum bleeding, infection, etc. development in the mother - Not being able to take the desired position for some reason, having a physical disability Newborn's Exclusion Criteria: - Transfer to another centre - Developing a complication such as respiratory distress |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Turkey | Sakarya University | Sakarya |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Sakarya University |
Turkey,
Christian P, Smith ER, Lee SE, Vargas AJ, Bremer AA, Raiten DJ. The need to study human milk as a biological system. Am J Clin Nutr. 2021 May 8;113(5):1063-1072. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab075. — View Citation
Çinar N., Sahin S. (2020) Anne ve Çocuk Sagligi ilk 1000 gün. Akademisyen Kitabevi. Ankara. S:264
Colson S. 2018. Biological nurturing; Instinctual Breastfeeding. Foreword by Kerstin Uvnas Moberg; 2 nd revised and uodated edition, London, Pinter & Martin, 4-148.
Colson SD, Meek JH, Hawdon JM. Optimal positions for the release of primitive neonatal reflexes stimulating breastfeeding. Early Hum Dev. 2008 Jul;84(7):441-9. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2007.12.003. Epub 2008 Feb 19. — View Citation
Davra, K., Chavda, P., Pandya, C., Dave, D., & Mehta, K. (2022). Breastfeeding position and attachment practices among lactating mothers: An urban community-based cross-sectional study from Vadodara city in western India. Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health, 15, 101009.
Doherty T, Horwood C, Pereira-Kotze C, du Plessis L, Witten C. Stemming commercial milk formula marketing: now is the time for radical transformation to build resilience for breastfeeding. Lancet. 2023 Feb 11;401(10375):415-418. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00095-8. Epub 2023 Feb 7. No abstract available. — View Citation
Duan X, Wang J, Jiang X. A meta-analysis of breastfeeding and osteoporotic fracture risk in the females. Osteoporos Int. 2017 Feb;28(2):495-503. doi: 10.1007/s00198-016-3753-x. Epub 2016 Aug 30. — View Citation
Ezeukwu OA, Ojukwu CP, Okemuo AJ, Anih CF, Ikele IT, Chukwu SC. Biomechanical analysis of the three recommended breastfeeding positions. Work. 2020;66(1):183-191. doi: 10.3233/WOR-203162. — View Citation
Puapornpong P, Raungrongmorakot K, Laosooksathit W, Hanprasertpong T, Ketsuwan S. Comparison of Breastfeeding Outcomes Between Using the Laid-Back and Side-Lying Breastfeeding Positions in Mothers Delivering by Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Breastfeed Med. 2017 May;12:233-237. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2016.0193. Epub 2017 Apr 6. — View Citation
Reni, C., Sinar, P., & Etin, R. (2020). Effect of Biologic Nurturing Baby Led Feeding on Post Sectio Caesarea Pain Scale In Majenang Hospital 2018. Midwifery And Nursing Research (MANR) Journal, 2(1), 22-27.
Tiryaki Ö., Peksen S. (2019). Anne Sütü ve Emzirme; Anneler Sordu Biz Cevapladik. Editör: Çinar N. Ankara:Gece Akademi. s. 26-30
Victora CG, Bahl R, Barros AJ, Franca GV, Horton S, Krasevec J, Murch S, Sankar MJ, Walker N, Rollins NC; Lancet Breastfeeding Series Group. Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet. 2016 Jan 30;387(10017):475-90. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01024-7. — View Citation
WHO, (2021). Infant and young child feding. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/infant-and-young-child-feeding Erisim Tarihi: 05.03.2023
WHO. (2020). Newborns: improving survival and well-being. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/newborns-reducing-mortality Erisim Tarihi: 05.03.2023
WHO. (2023). Erisim adresi: https://www.who.int/health-topics/breastfeeding#tab=tab_1 Erisimtarihi: 05.03.2023.
* Note: There are 15 references in all — Click here to view all references
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | The effect of Group 1 (biological breastfeeding position) and Group 2 (armpit / football breastfeeding position) on breastfeeding self-efficacy. | (Breast-Feeding Self-Efficacy Scale- Short Form/BSES-SF): (Breast-Feeding Self-Efficacy Scale- Short Form/BSES-SF): Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale is a 33-item scale developed by Dennis and Faux in 1999. The Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale Short Form was developed by Dennis (2003) by reducing it to a 14-item scale. The validity and reliability of the scale in our country was done by Tokat Alus, Okumus, and Dennis (2010). The scale is a 5-point Likert-type scale and is evaluated as I am never sure (1 point) and I am always sure (5 points). The minimum score that can be obtained from the scale is 14, and the maximum score is 70. The scale has no breakpoints. An increase in the scale score means higher breastfeeding self-efficacy. The cronbach alpha value of the scale was found to be 0.87. | Within postpartum 24th hour | |
Primary | The effect of Group 1 (biological breastfeeding position) and Group 2 (armpit / football breastfeeding position) on breastfeeding success. | LATCH : Jensen et al. (1994) provides a systematic evaluation of breastfeeding and the identification of areas that require intervention in breastfeeding. Each letter of the abbreviation LATCH indicates a breastfeeding assessment area.
"L" baby's ability to grasp the breast, "A" The presence of baby audible swallowing at the breast, "T" mother's nipple type, "C" is the mother's sense of comfort, "H" refers to the position the mother uses to hold or breastfeed, and the amount of help the mother needs to hold the baby. Scale evaluation is done by giving 0, 1 and 2 points to each item. Breastfeeding success is evaluated by summing the scores. The highest score that can be obtained from the scale is 10 and the lowest score is 0. An increase in the scores obtained from the scale indicates the success of breastfeeding. |
Within postpartum 24th hour | |
Secondary | The effect of Group 1 (biological breastfeeding position) and Group 2 (armpit / football breastfeeding position) on postpartum comfort. | Postpartum Comfort Scale: The postpartum comfort scale was developed by Karakaplan and Yildiz in 2010. It was developed to evaluate the postpartum comfort of mothers who had cesarean section or normal vaginal delivery in a holistic approach based on the comfort theory and is used to evaluate the physical, psychospiritual, sociocultural and environmental comforts of mothers as a whole.The scale consists of 34 items.. The average value is determined by dividing the total score obtained from the scale by the number of items, and the result is shown in the 1-5 distribution. Basically, low comfort is expressed with 1 and high comfort with 5. The lowest score to be taken from the scale is 34 and the highest score is 170. An increase in the total score obtained from the scale indicates that the comfort level is high. | Within postpartum 24th hour |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT00579605 -
Motivational Interviewing to Promote Sustained Breastfeeding
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05655364 -
Development of a Breastfeeding Supportive Mobile Application
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03853850 -
Using Mobile Phone Text Messaging System to Improve Exclusive Breastfeeding Rate in a Resource-poor Caribbean Island
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03957941 -
FamilyLink and Breastfeeding
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT03709004 -
Pacifiers and Breastfeeding Among Mothers at Risk for Postpartum Depression
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02958475 -
Mother's Milk Messaging: Evaluation of a Bilingual Application (APP) to Support Initiation and Exclusive Breastfeeding in New Mothers
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05503069 -
Community Interventions to Improve Breastfeeding
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02233439 -
Double-blind, Placebocontrolled A Randomized Trial on the Efficacy of Herbal Galactogogues
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01893736 -
Professional Breastfeeding Support Intervention
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02738957 -
Effect of Prenatal Counseling on Breastfeeding Rates in Twins
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00527956 -
Facilitation and Barriers to Breastfeeding in the NICU
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03655314 -
Using the Electronic Health Record to Guide Management of Newborn Weight Loss
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05562245 -
Motivational Interviewing-Based Breastfeeding Education
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05106634 -
Evaluation of Breastfeeding Success and Self-Efficacy in Mothers Giving Birth Via Vaginal Delivery or Cesarean Section
|
||
Completed |
NCT05992753 -
Mothers' Breast Milk Expression Experiences, Infant Feeding Attitudes and Perceived Social Support Levels
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05213975 -
Kinesio Taping Application After Cesarean Section
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05250219 -
Microchimeric Cell Tranfer From Mother to Child - Pilo Study
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05371106 -
Mycotoxins in Mothers Milk in Israel
|
||
Completed |
NCT03332108 -
Novel Approach To Improving Lactation Support With Mobile Health Technology
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02901665 -
Impact of Increased Parent Presence in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit on Parent & Infant Outcomes
|
N/A |