Physiotherapy in the Treatment of Breastfeeding Difficulties

Breastfeeding Clinical Trial

Official title:

Efficacy of a Physiotherapy Treatment in Newborns With Breastfeeding Difficulties

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05843279
• Other study ID #: 35/2022
• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: July 1, 2023
• Est. completion date: November 1, 2023

Study information

• Verified date: May 2023
• Source: Universidad de Almeria
• Contact: Gemma María López Segura, Physiotherapy graduate
• Phone: 610024516
• Email: gemalose[@]gmail.com
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The objective of this randomized, single-blind clinical trial is to compare the efficacy of two treatments (Myofunctional Therapy and breastfeeding sessions) in infants who have difficulty breastfeeding during the first week of life. The main questions to be answered are: - Is breastfeeding improved with this type of intervention? - What type of intervention is better? - After carrying out these interventions, does the baby need to undergo surgery if it presents a sublingual frenulum? Participants must be infants who are one week old and who have been diagnosed with ankyloglossia through the Hazelbaker Scale. They will be randomly distributed into the two intervention groups and after one month of treatment, they will be assessed again using the same scale. The researchers will compare the results between these two groups in order to verify the best intervention.

Description:

Infants who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, respectively, were accepted to participate in the study. The randomization of the sample was performed by a statistician, who had no prior contact with either the infants or the parents. The online Randomizer (www.randomizer.org) program was used to randomly generate 200 sets of numbers, each containing two numbers ranging from 1 to 2 in random order. After signing the consent, a code was randomly chosen for each patient, thus ensuring that the 200 patients were equally distributed into two groups according to the group number of each code: group 1 (Myofunctional Therapy group) and group 2 (group sessions lactation). Infants who met the inclusion criteria were referred to the rehabilitation and physiotherapy service. A physical therapist outside the study was in charge of evaluating the measurements of all infants during the first week of life through all the scales detailed below (pre-test). After randomly assigning the infants, another physiotherapist was responsible for applying the intervention once a week for 30 minutes for a period of 30 days. Once the intervention was finished, all the infants (both intervention groups) were reassessed by the physiotherapist outside the study using the same baseline scales (post-test).

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Enrollment: 200
• Est. completion date: November 1, 2023
• Est. primary completion date: November 1, 2023
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 7 Days to 31 Days

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Full-term infants exclusively breastfed
• Born both by normal delivery and by cesarean section
• Who presented difficulty in breastfeeding

Exclusion Criteria:

• Preterm newborns
• With low birth weight (less than 2,500 kg)
• Mothers with flat or inverted nipples
• Patients who did not wish and did not authorize to participate in the study.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Ankyloglossia
• Breastfeeding
• Lactation Disorders

Intervention

Procedure:
• Myofunctional therapy
In one group, physiotherapy intervention is performed on the orofacial structures of the baby and in another group, the posture presented by the mother while breastfeeding her baby is corrected.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Universidad de Almeria

References & Publications (15)

Ballard JL, Auer CE, Khoury JC. Ankyloglossia: assessment, incidence, and effect of frenuloplasty on the breastfeeding dyad. Pediatrics. 2002 Nov;110(5):e63. doi: 10.1542/peds.110.5.e63. — View Citation

Bruney TL, Scime NV, Madubueze A, Chaput KH. Systematic review of the evidence for resolution of common breastfeeding problems-Ankyloglossia (Tongue Tie). Acta Paediatr. 2022 May;111(5):940-947. doi: 10.1111/apa.16289. Epub 2022 Feb 21. — View Citation

Brzecka D, Garbacz M, Mical M, Zych B, Lewandowski B. Diagnosis, classification and management of ankyloglossia including its influence on breastfeeding. Dev Period Med. 2019;23(1):79-87. doi: 10.34763/devperiodmed.20192301.7985. — View Citation

Campanha SMA, Martinelli RLC, Palhares DB. Association between ankyloglossia and breastfeeding. Codas. 2019 Feb 25;31(1):e20170264. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20182018264. — View Citation

Colombari GC, Mariusso MR, Ercolin LT, Mazzoleni S, Stellini E, Ludovichetti FS. Relationship between Breastfeeding Difficulties, Ankyloglossia, and Frenotomy: A Literature Review. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021 Apr 1;22(4):452-461. — View Citation

Costa-Romero M, Espinola-Docio B, Paricio-Talayero JM, Diaz-Gomez NM. Ankyloglossia in breastfeeding infants. An update. Arch Argent Pediatr. 2021 Dec;119(6):e600-e609. doi: 10.5546/aap.2021.eng.e600. English, Spanish. — View Citation

Ferres-Amat E, Pastor-Vera T, Rodriguez-Alessi P, Ferres-Amat E, Mareque-Bueno J, Ferres-Padro E. Management of Ankyloglossia and Breastfeeding Difficulties in the Newborn: Breastfeeding Sessions, Myofunctional Therapy, and Frenotomy. Case Rep Pediatr. 20 — View Citation

Ferres-Amat E, Pastor-Vera T, Rodriguez-Alessi P, Ferres-Amat E, Mareque-Bueno J, Ferres-Padro E. The prevalence of ankyloglossia in 302 newborns with breastfeeding problems and sucking difficulties in Barcelona: a descriptive study. Eur J Paediatr Dent. — View Citation

Frenectomy for the Correction of Ankyloglossia: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines [Internet]. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2016 Jun 15. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK373454/ — View Citation

Ghaheri BA, Cole M, Fausel SC, Chuop M, Mace JC. Breastfeeding improvement following tongue-tie and lip-tie release: A prospective cohort study. Laryngoscope. 2017 May;127(5):1217-1223. doi: 10.1002/lary.26306. Epub 2016 Sep 19. — View Citation

Gonzalez Garrido MDP, Garcia-Munoz C, Rodriguez-Huguet M, Martin-Vega FJ, Gonzalez-Medina G, Vinolo-Gil MJ. Effectiveness of Myofunctional Therapy in Ankyloglossia: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 28;19(19):12347. doi: 10.33 — View Citation

Manipon C. Ankyloglossia and the Breastfeeding Infant: Assessment and Intervention. Adv Neonatal Care. 2016 Apr;16(2):108-13. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000252. — View Citation

Messner AH, Walsh J, Rosenfeld RM, Schwartz SR, Ishman SL, Baldassari C, Brietzke SE, Darrow DH, Goldstein N, Levi J, Meyer AK, Parikh S, Simons JP, Wohl DL, Lambie E, Satterfield L. Clinical Consensus Statement: Ankyloglossia in Children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 May;162(5):597-611. doi: 10.1177/0194599820915457. Epub 2020 Apr 14. — View Citation

Walker RD, Messing S, Rosen-Carole C, McKenna Benoit M. Defining Tip-Frenulum Length for Ankyloglossia and Its Impact on Breastfeeding: A Prospective Cohort Study. Breastfeed Med. 2018 Apr;13(3):204-210. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2017.0116. Epub 2018 Mar 20. — View Citation

Wen Z, Walner DL, Popova Y, Walner EG. Tongue-tie and breastfeeding. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Sep;160:111242. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2022.111242. Epub 2022 Jul 20. — View Citation

* Note: There are 15 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Hazelbaker scale	This scale evaluates the appearance (5 items) and the function of the language (7 items). Each item is scored on a 2/1/0 scale (2 equals good appearance and/or full function; 1 equals moderate appearance and/or partial function; 0 equals no appearance and inadequate function). The maximum appearance score is 10, indicating that there are no limitations in the orofacial structures, and if it is less than 8, a limitation is confirmed. The maximum function score is 14, which reflects preserved function and if it is less than 11, the function is considered to be diminished.	one month
Primary	Latch Scale	It is made up of different areas of assessment: how the baby latches on, amount of audible swallowing, type/condition of the mother's nipple, mother's comfort level, and amount of help the mother needs to latch on. baby at the breast The rating system is 0/1/2 in each item (0 equals the "least favourable" and 2 the "most favourable"). The highest score is 10, which means that there is no problem in breastfeeding. If the score is less than 9, it means that the mother and baby need help with breastfeeding.	one month
Primary	Visual Analogue Scale	This scale evaluates the pain suffered by the mother's nipple while the child is breastfeeding. The maximum score is 10 (unbearable pain) and the minimum score is 0 (no pain). Higher scores mean more breastfeeding problems and the need for help from a health professional.	one month
Primary	Surgical intervention after treatment	If the baby needs frenectomy or frenotomy after the month of treatment	one month
Secondary	infant sex	if the baby is male or female	one day
Secondary	mother's age at delivery	mother's age when her baby is born	one day
Secondary	gestational age	weeks of gestation of the baby	one day
Secondary	mother's educational level	If the mother has primary or higher education	one day
Secondary	mother's marital status	single or married	one day
Secondary	type of delivery	vaginal delivery or caesarean section	one day
Secondary	Number of births including the present	Number of births including the present	one day
Secondary	Coryllos and Catherine Watson Genna's type of frenulum classification	Type of sublingual frenulum	one day

External Links

•   Recommendations on the duration of breastfeeding according to the World Health Organization (OMS)