View clinical trials related to Breast Neoplasm.
Filter by:This study evaluates the impact of elective regional lymph node irradiation on N1 breast cancer patients receiving post-lumpectomy radiotherapy and anthracycline plus taxane (AT)-based chemotherapy. We randomly assign patients having one to three metastatic lymph nodes (pN1) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and AT-based chemotherapy to undergo either whole-breast and regional nodal irradiation (WB+RNI group) or whole-breast irradiation alone (WBI group).
The primary objective of this study is to determine the correlation between the distribution of F-18 FES within ER+ breast tumors as seen on Positron Emission Mammography (PEM) images of the breast, and the distribution of cells stained ER+ within the tumor by immunohistochemistry (IHC) measurements at surgical pathology. The secondary aim is to determine if the correlation (or lack of) between F-18 FES uptake and F-18 FDG uptake as imaged by PEM, is an accurate representation of the heterogeneity of ER expression in the tumor.
In this study the investigators assess the impact of the eHealth-supported therapy management system CANKADO on Quality of Life in patients with HR+, HER2-locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer treated with the cyclin dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) Inhibitor Palbociclib in combination with an aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant. Furthermore this approach will be combined with biomarker screening to identify predictive markers for and to learn more about adherence, symptoms, response, and resistance.
This pilot clinical trial studies radiofrequency technology in locating non-palpable breast lesions in patients undergoing surgery. Placing a miniature radiofrequency tag or microchip in the breast lesion before surgery and using a handheld device to guide doctors during surgery may improve surgical outcomes in patients with non-palpable breast lesions.
This trial studies how well a decision aid website works in helping to make decisions about fertility in participants with cancer. Decision aid websites that provide information about fertility preservation (maintaining your ability to have children of your own after cancer treatment) may help participants with cancer make fertility-preservation decisions.
The aim of the present study is analyze the effects of combined training program (resistance and aerobics) in comparison with a non-training group on quality of life, as well as on neuromuscular and cardiorespiratory parameters in breast cancer patients in stages one to three who have finished their treatment, such as surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Therefore, 42 women will be randomly divided into two groups: combined training group and control group. The subjects of the combined training group will undergo the intervention three times a week for eight weeks. The combined group will carry out both resistance and aerobic exercises in the same session. The resistance training will be comprised by ten exercises which will alternate body segments with maximum repetitions in the first set and the lower limit of the repetitions interval in the next sets. Along the training, the number of series will be increased whereas the number of repetitions will be decreased. The intensity of the aerobic exercises will be based on the percentage of the heart rate of the anaerobic threshold on the first weeks and on the speed of the anaerobic and aerobic threshold on the last weeks. Before and after the intervention, there will be evaluation of maximal dynamic strength of knee extensors and elbow flexors, maximum voluntary isometric contraction of knee extensors, maximum muscular activity of vastus lateralis and rectus femoris, muscle thickness of knee extensors, peak oxygen uptake and ventilatory threshold, quality of life and cancer-related fatigue. Data will be analyzed by Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) and Bonferroni's post-hoc (α=0,05), including both protocol and intention to treat.
The purpose of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to evaluate a decision support website (RealRisks) designed to inform patients about breast cancer prevention options. It is coupled with a physician-centered (BNAV) decision support website as part of clinical workflow in the primary care setting. The investigators hypothesize that improving accuracy of breast cancer risk perception and understanding of the risks and benefits of breast cancer risk lowering drugs, also known as chemoprevention, will increase the uptake of chemoprevention in the primary care setting.
This is a single arm, open label study of SV-BR-1-GM, a targeted immunotherapy for breast cancer. Eligible patients will have histological confirmation of breast cancer with recurrent and/or metastatic lesions. The treatment regimen includes a pre-treatment with low-dose cyclophosphamide 2-3 days before the inoculation; inoculation in 4 sites on the thighs and upper back; and post-treatment inoculation of Interferon-alpha-2b into the sites of inoculation ~2 and ~4 days after the inoculation. These is repeated every 2 weeks for one month (3 treatments), then monthly for up to one year. Standard tumor assessments are performed at baseline and then every 2-3 months.
This pilot trial evaluates in vivo megestrol acetate (MA) modulation of steroidal receptors in advanced breast cancer.
In addition to axillary lymph node (ALN), internal mammary lymph node (IMLN) chain is also the first-echelon nodal drainage site for metastasis and it provides important prognostic information in breast cancer patients. However, decision about local treatment of IMLN is still being made based on ALN status. The 2016 National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines recommend internal mammary lymph node irradiation for patients with more than 4 positive ALNs (category 1), and strongly consider irradiation for patients with 1 to 3 positive ALNs (category 2A). Therefore, there will be patients in positive ALN subgroup who just face complications of an unnecessary radiation to IMLN and there will be patients in negative ALN subgroup who do not receive adjuvant radiation therapy they really need. Thus, these inclusion criteria of National Comprehensive Cancer Network might lead to over-treatment and under-treatment. Internal mammary sentinel lymph node biopsy (IM-SLNB) provides a less invasive method of assessing the IMLN than surgical dissection. However, low visualization rate of IM-SLN has been a restriction of IM-SLNB. A modified radiotracer injection technique was established in our previous study. This technique could significantly improve the IM-SLN detection rate. The investigators have validated the accurate of the hypothesis and the modified radiotracer injection technique in the previous study. For axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy, the success rate and the accuracy are the most important technical indicators. The relatively lower false-negative rate is a precondition for the widely application of SLNB. Axillary SLNB needs to be accomplished with the cooperation of multi-disciplinary teamwork, including the breast surgery, the radiologist, the nuclear medicine doctor and the pathologist, in order to obtain a better success rate and a lower false-negative rate. Our previous studies confirmed that the modified radiotracer injection technique can greatly improve the IM-SLN detection rate. However, whether the IM-SLNB based on the modified radiotracer injection technique has a low false negative rate or not still need to be confirmed by a further validation research. Furthermore，recently, the investigators propose that if IM-SLN is the only metastatic lymph node and there would be no positive node else in IMLN chain, the radiotherapy and its associated complications could be avoided in these patients. On the other hand, if there is the presence of metastatic non-sentinel lymph node (NSLN) in IMLN chain after IM-SLNB, it is important to predict the risk of IM-NSLN metastasis in IM-SLN positive patients. As there is currently no such model, a predictive model for IM-SLN positive patients to avoid radiotherapy is needed in this situation. Therefore, a new study will be conducted to verify the issues above. In the current study, all the participants (18~70 years of age) would have the preoperative pathology of invasive breast cancer and positive fine-needle aspiration result in their clinical or ultrasonic suspicious axillary lymph node. 99mTc-labeled sulfur colloid was injected into the parenchyma under the ultrasound guidance 3 to 18 hours before surgery. Two syringes of 9.25 to 18.5MBq 99mTc-labeled sulfur colloid in 0.5 to 0.7mL volume were injected at the 6 and 12 o'clock positions 0.5 to 1.0 cm from areola (about 2.0~4.0 cm from the nipple). IM-SLNB was performed in all participants with IMSLN visualized on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and/or detected by the intra-operative gamma probe. All hotspots in the internal mammary basin were harvested and intra-operative identification of the IM-SLN was based on gamma probe detection. The IM-SLN was sectioned along the long axis into two blocks and all blocks were tested by the frozen section and the touch imprint cytology intra-operatively. Those participants with positive intra-operative results received IMLN dissection. Finally, all the IM-SLN blocks and IM-NSLN dissected were assessed post-operatively by H&E and Cytokeratin 19 stained immunohistochemistry. The conclusion would be drawn through the results mentioned above.