Evaluation of Macugen Treatment of Macular Edema Due to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion

Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion Clinical Trial

Official title:

Open Label Macugen for the Treatment of Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT00406107
• Other study ID #: PRC-001
• Secondary ID: Pfizer Reference
• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 4
• First received: November 30, 2006
• Last updated: September 10, 2014
• Start date: January 2006
• Est. completion date: April 2008

Study information

• Verified date: September 2014
• Source: Palmetto Retina Center, LLC
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: United States: Food and Drug Administration
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of intravitreal injections of Macugen every 6 weeks for the treatment of macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). We hypothesize that macular edema secondary to BRVO is mediated by VEGF 165 and that chronic suppression of VEGF 165 will successfully treat BRVO related macular edema.

Description:

Retinal venous occlusive disease, which includes central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) and branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO), is second only to diabetic retinopathy as a cause of vision loss due to retinal disease. The main cause of vision loss in all of these disorders is the development of macular edema. Current clinical practice based on randomized controlled clinical trials (ETDRS, BVOS) employs laser photocoagulation, either in a focal or grid pattern, to treat macular edema associated with diabetic retinopathy and branch retinal vein occlusion. Unfortunately, laser photocoagulation is ineffective in central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO), and no proven therapy exists for CRVO.

The pathogenesis of macular edema in retinal vascular diseases is generally accepted to be increased levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) due to ischemic or other stimuli. VEGF is known to be one of the most potent stimulators of vascular leakage in humans. Therefore, it seems sensible to study inhibition of VEGF to reduce vascular leakage, reduce macular edema, and improve vision in these retinal vascular disorders.

Phase 2 randomized, controlled clinical trials of Macugen in diabetic macular edema and in macular edema associated with CRVO have been conducted. In the diabetes trial, patients treated with Macugen had improved vision, reduced macular edema as measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT), and reduced need for laser treatment compared to patients treated with sham injections. In the CRVO trial, patients treated with Macugen 1 mg every 6 weeks for 24 weeks had improved vision and reduced macular edema at week 30 compared to sham. This is the first randomized trial of treatment for CRVO to show a benefit over control. Based on these positive findings, we plan to study Macugen treatment of macular edema due to BRVO.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 20
• Est. completion date: April 2008
• Est. primary completion date: December 2007
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Both
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Macular edema secondary to BRVO involving the foveal center in male or female patients at least 18 years of age

• Duration of BRVO macular edema less than 6 months prior to baseline visit

• Best corrected ETDRS visual acuity 20/40-20/320 (Snellen equivalent) using the 4 meters testing method.

• Central foveal thickness greater than or equal to 250 microns using the OCT-3

• Less than 25% of foveal capillary ring disruption

• Less than 2 disc areas of capillary non-perfusion within 1000 microns of the foveal center

• Absence of hemorrhage or lipid in the foveal center

• Investigator comfortable deferring macular laser for 18 weeks from baseline and intravitreous steroid for 36 weeks from baseline

Exclusion Criteria:

• Ocular conditions other than BRVO related macular edema such as significant cataract, diabetic retinopathy, AMD, glaucoma, uveitis, epiretinal membrane, vitreomacular traction or tumor.

• Intraocular surgery within past 3 months

• Significant enlargement of foveal avascular zone(>25% disruption of capillary ring) or greater than 2 disc areas of nonperfusion within 1000 microns of foveal center.

• Likelihood of evidence driven indication for peripheral photocoagulation in the next 6 months.

• Patients who have shown evidence of spontaneous improvement within the preceding 3 months, as determined by an improvement of >15 letters of vision or thinning of the Center Point on OCT of >20% from baseline determination

• Prior grid laser within 4 months of baseline or more than one prior grid laser treatment.

• No prior intravitreous or periocular steroid injections in the study eye.

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
• Macular Edema
• Retinal Vein Occlusion

Intervention

Drug:
• pegaptanib sodium (Macugen)
Subjects were randomized 3:1 to intravitreous injections of pegaptanib 0.3mg or 1mg at baseline and at weeks 6 and 12 with subsequent injections at 6-week intervals at investigator discretion until week 48.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	Cumberland Valley Retina Center	Hagerstown	Maryland
United States	Jules Stein Eye Institute	Los Angeles	California
United States	Palmetto Retina Center	West Columbia	South Carolina

Sponsors (3)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Palmetto Retina Center, LLC	Eyetech Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (6)

Aiello LP, Avery RL, Arrigg PG, Keyt BA, Jampel HD, Shah ST, Pasquale LR, Thieme H, Iwamoto MA, Park JE, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor in ocular fluid of patients with diabetic retinopathy and other retinal disorders. N Engl J Med. 1994 Dec 1;331(22):1480-7. — View Citation

Argon laser photocoagulation for macular edema in branch vein occlusion. The Branch Vein Occlusion Study Group. Am J Ophthalmol. 1984 Sep 15;98(3):271-82. — View Citation

Cunningham ET Jr, Adamis AP, Altaweel M, Aiello LP, Bressler NM, D'Amico DJ, Goldbaum M, Guyer DR, Katz B, Patel M, Schwartz SD; Macugen Diabetic Retinopathy Study Group. A phase II randomized double-masked trial of pegaptanib, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor aptamer, for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2005 Oct;112(10):1747-57. — View Citation

Evaluation of grid pattern photocoagulation for macular edema in central vein occlusion. The Central Vein Occlusion Study Group M report. Ophthalmology. 1995 Oct;102(10):1425-33. — View Citation

Funatsu H, Yamashita H, Ikeda T, Nakanishi Y, Kitano S, Hori S. Angiotensin II and vascular endothelial growth factor in the vitreous fluid of patients with diabetic macular edema and other retinal disorders. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002 Apr;133(4):537-43. — View Citation

Photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study report number 1. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study research group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1985 Dec;103(12):1796-806. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Change in ETDRS Best Corrected Visual Acuity From Baseline at 54 Weeks		54 Weeks	No
Secondary	Standardized Change From Baseline in Macular Thickening Measured by OCT3 Using the Central Point of the Central Subfield		54 Weeks	No
Secondary	Safety Parameters	Safety endpoints incuded all investigator reported ocular and systemic adverse events. All events were graded as mild moderate or severe and assessed as related or unrelated to the injection procedure and the study drug.	54 Weeks	Yes
Secondary	Change in Central Subfield Thickness on OCT From Baseline to Week 54		54 Weeks	No
Secondary	Change in Macular Volume on OCT From Baseline to Week 54		54 Weeks	No