Clinical Trials Logo

Brain Swelling clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Brain Swelling.

Filter by:
  • None
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT05696639 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

SMCV Assessment on Brain Swelling in Patients With SAH

Bayysmcv
Start date: April 1, 2017
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Cerebral swelling is a major complication following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.This study is a retrospective cohort aimed to predict the extent of brain swelling. Cerebral venous assessment can identify the risk of brain swelling and improve surgical outcomes.

NCT ID: NCT04328974 Completed - Clinical trials for Heart Arrest, Out-Of-Hospital

The Effect of Lumbar CSF Drainage on the Neurologic Outcome Improvement in OHCA Underwent TTM

Start date: July 5, 2021
Phase:
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

Aim: The investigators aim to evaluate the effect of lumbar cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage on neurologic outcome in post-cardiac arrest (CA) patients treated with target temperature management (TTM). Methods: This is a prospective single-center study conducted from May 2020 to November 2021 on patients who have been treated with TTM following CA. The propensity score matching is proceeded between the lumbar CSF drainage and non-lumbar CSF drainage groups. The good outcome group is defined as a Glasgow-Pittsburgh cerebral performance categories (CPC) scale 1 or 2, and the poor outcome group as a CPC between 3 and 5. Lumbar CSF drainage is initiated when intracranial pressure (ICP) exceeded 15 mmHg in the absence of noxious stimuli at the rate of 10~20 ml/h via a lumbar drainage catheter until ICP is less than 15 mmHg. The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is obtained between 72-96 h after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) to evaluate the effect of lumbar CSF drainage on attenuation of brain swelling through quantitative analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). Multivariate logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier models are built to identify the effect of CSF drainage on the neurologic outcome improvement.

NCT ID: NCT01054404 Terminated - Dehydration Clinical Trials

Furosemide vs Placebo for Brain Relaxation

Start date: February 2010
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Increased brain bulk may be problematic during brain surgery for tumors because it may limit surgical exposure and access to the surgical site. Mannitol, an osmotic diuretic, is commonly given to alleviate brain bulk, and sometimes furosemide in a small dose is added if mannitol alone is insufficient. It is unclear if adding this furosemide truly helps to diminish brain bulk, and it is possible that furosemide may cause too much diuresis, leading to dehydration and its side effects (e.g., low blood pressure). Our purpose is to investigate what the effects of furosemide are in the setting of brain surgery for tumors, specifically with regards to decreasing brain bulk and/or causing dehydration. Study Hypothesis: The addition of furosemide to mannitol will result in improved brain relaxation in human subjects undergoing craniotomy for brain tumor resection than that seen with mannitol alone. However, the combination of mannitol and furosemide will also lead to more significant intravascular volume depletion than that seen with mannitol alone.