BPH With Large Prostate Clinical Trial
Official title:
Comparison of Pasmakinetic Enucleation of the Prostate With Bipolar Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy Patients With Large Prostate
Verified date | July 2012 |
Source | Fuzhou General Hospital |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | China: Ministry of Health |
Study type | Interventional |
The goal of this study is to compare the perioperative and postoperative characters of plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate(PkEP) with bipolar TURP(B-TURP) for BPH patients with large prostate.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 80 |
Est. completion date | December 2011 |
Est. primary completion date | December 2006 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Male |
Age group | 50 Years to 70 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Qmax < 10 mL/s, IPSS >19 - Age between 50 and 70 years - Prostate volume between 70 and 200 mL, as determined by TRUS, and medical therapy failure. Exclusion Criteria: - Patients with neurogenic bladder - Urethral stricture - Bladder tumor - Prostate cancer and previous prostate bladder neck - Urethral surgery - PSA>4ng/ml, or receiving prostate biopsy within 3 months |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
China | Fuzhou General Hospital | Fuzhou | Fujian |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Fuzhou General Hospital |
China,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | time of catheterization | At the end of both procedures, a 22F three-way Folley catheter was inserted and continuous bladder irrigation was performed. Irrigation was discontinued when the catheter drainage became clear, and the catheter was removed 6 h later.Two experienced urologists who were unaware of the surgical modality used decided bladder irrigation and catheter removal for all cases. | No | |
Secondary | Operation time | Yes | ||
Secondary | resected adenoma weight as a measure of treatment efficacy | No | ||
Secondary | changes in serum haemoglobin as a measure of one of the complications | Yes | ||
Secondary | postoperative International Prostate Symptom Score as a measure of treatment efficacy and durability | 5 years | No | |
Secondary | postoperative Qmax as a masure of treatment efficacy and durability | 5 years | No | |
Secondary | re-operation rate as a measure of durability | 5 years | No |