Bone Nonunion Clinical Trial
Official title:
The Clinical Therapeutic Effects and Safety of Tissue-engineered Bone
The purpose of this study is to compare use of a tissue-engineered bone to use of a standard allograft bone to treat bone defect in patients. The hypothesis is that use of the tissue-engineered bone is effective and safe to treat the bone defect in patients.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 20 |
Est. completion date | December 2020 |
Est. primary completion date | September 2019 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 1 Year to 60 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - the patients with bone defect and bone nonunion caused by tumor or trauma - the length of bone defect in long diaphysis is more than 4cm or more than half of the shaft diameter - the size of bone defect is more than 5cmx5cm - the patients are unable to use autologous bone graft or other treatments - the patients request to use the treatment of tissue-engineered bone - Supportive family with willingness to participate in completing questionnaires Exclusion Criteria: - Patients with serious diseases such as hemorrhagic disorders, infection, tumor, contagion and so on. - Patients who are pregnant - Patients with serious abnormal cardiopulmonary function - Patients disagree to use the tissue-engineered bone - Patients are older than 60 years - Patients who are regarded to be unqualified by investigator |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
China | Department of Orthopedics, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University | Xi'an | Shanxi |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Xijing Hospital |
China,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | The scores of bone healing | The scores of bone healing are divided into three kinds: nonhealing: 0; delayed healing: 1; normal healing: 2. The average score of tissue-engineered bone is compared with the score of control group using allograft bone to verify the clinical efficacy of tissue-engineered bone. | within 48 weeks after surgical treatment of bone dect | |
Primary | the adverse event incidence using tissue-engineered bone and allograft bone | the adverse event incidence of tissue-engineered bone is compared with the adverse event incidence of allograft bone to verify the safety of tissue-engineered bone. | within 24 weeks after surgical treatment of bone dect | |
Secondary | The scores of blood routine test | The scores of blood routine test after operation are divided into three kinds: severely abnormal:0;abnormal:1;normal:2. The average score of tissue-engineered bone is compared with the score of control group using allograft bone to verify the clinical efficacy of tissue-engineered bone. | within 48 weeks after surgical treatment of bone dect | |
Secondary | The scores of erythrocyte sedimentation rate(ESR) | The scores of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) after operation are divided into three kinds: severely abnormal:0;abnormal:1;normal:2. The average score of tissue-engineered bone is compared with the score of control group using allograft bone to verify the clinical efficacy of tissue-engineered bone. | within 48 weeks after surgical treatment of bone dect | |
Secondary | The scores of C-reactive protein | The scores of C-reaction protein after operation are divided into three kinds: severely abnormal:0;abnormal:1;normal:2. The average score of tissue-engineered bone is compared with the score of control group using allograft bone to verify the clinical efficacy of tissue-engineered bone. | within 48 weeks after surgical treatment of bone dect | |
Secondary | The scores of the ratio of complement C3 to complement C4 | The scores of ratio of complement C3 to C4 after operation are divided into three kinds: severely abnormal:0;abnormal:1;normal:2. The average score of tissue-engineered bone is compared with the score of control group using allograft bone to verify the clinical efficacy of tissue-engineered bone. | within 48 weeks after surgical treatment of bone dect | |
Secondary | The scores of immunoglobulin assay | The scores of immunoglobulin assay (IgG, IgA and IgM) after operation are divided into three kinds: severely abnormal:0;abnormal:1;normal:2. The average score of tissue-engineered bone is compared with the score of control group using allograft bone to verify the clinical efficacy of tissue-engineered bone. | within 48 weeks after surgical treatment of bone dect | |
Secondary | The scores of duration of hospital stay | The scores of duration of hospital stay are divided into four kinds: longer than one months: 0; longer than two weeks:1; longer than one week:2; less than one week:3. The average score of tissue-engineered bone is compared with the score of control group using allograft bone to verify the clinical efficacy of tissue-engineered bone. | within 48 weeks after surgical treatment of bone dect | |
Secondary | the scores of time of weight loading after operation | The scores of time of weight loading after operation are divided into three kinds: longer than six months: 0; longer than three months:1; less than three months:2. The average score of tissue-engineered bone is compared with the score of control group using allograft bone to verify the clinical efficacy of tissue-engineered bone. | within 48 weeks after surgical treatment of bone dect | |
Secondary | The scores of tumorigenesis | The scores of tumorigenesis after operation are divided into three kinds: severely abnormal:0;abnormal:1;normal:2. The average score of tissue-engineered bone is compared with the score of control group using allograft bone to verify the clinical efficacy of tissue-engineered bone. | within 48 weeks after surgical treatment of bone dect | |
Secondary | The scores of treatment course | The scores of treatment course are divided into three kinds: long:0;general :1;short:2. The average score of tissue-engineered bone is compared with the score of control group using allograft bone to verify the clinical efficacy of tissue-engineered bone. | within 48 weeks after surgical treatment of bone dect | |
Secondary | The scores of number of operations | The scores of number of operations are divided into four kinds: above three times:0; three times:1;two times:2;one time:3. The average score of tissue-engineered bone is compared with the score of control group using allograft bone to verify the clinical efficacy of tissue-engineered bone. | within 48 weeks after surgical treatment of bone dect | |
Secondary | The scores of pain | The scores of pain after operation are divided into four kinds: severe:0;moderate:1;slight:2; none:3. The average score of tissue-engineered bone is compared with the score of control group using allograft bone to verify the clinical efficacy of tissue-engineered bone. | within 48 weeks after surgical treatment of bone dect | |
Secondary | The scores of wound healing of soft tissue | The scores of wound healing are divided into four kinds: infection: 0; no healing: 1; delayed healing: 2; normal healing: 3. The average score of tissue-engineered bone is compared with the score of control group using allograft bone to verify the clinical efficacy of tissue-engineered bone. | within 48 weeks after surgical treatment of bone dect |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02815423 -
Safety and Exploratory Efficacy Study of UCMSCs in Patients With Fracture and Bone Nonunion
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04997590 -
Clinical Study of Umbilical Cord Blood Mononuclear Cells (UCB-MNCs) in the Treatment of Traumatic Fracture Healing
|
N/A |