View clinical trials related to Bone Loss, Alveolar.
Filter by:Although smoking has been proposed as well, as a risk factor/indicator for peri-implantitis, there is currently no conclusive evidence. The current literature confronts the inconclusive evidence of tobacco for a risk factor. Therefore, the aim of the present investigation is to determine the association between tobacco and peri-implantitis in sample of patients who had received therapy implant-supported restorative therapy in a university setting. The present study was designed as a retrospective case control study in a sample of patients with implant-supported restorative therapy 7-19 years after restorative phase. The study was conducted at the Clinica Universitaria d'Odontologia (CUO) in the Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (UIC) for 1 month and was performed following the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki (revised, amended, and clarified in 2013. Prior to enrol the study a written informed consent was signed. Patients provided with implant-supported restorative therapy between 2001-2013 was selected from the UIC database. The sample was divided in three groups: healthy patients, patients with mucositis and patients with peri-implantitis. During the examination, the clinician reviewed with the patient the Information and Medication History Forms and record the anthropometric, socio-demographic and clinical information. An initial questionnaire was conducted to obtain information regarding age, gender, medical history, medication, and health behaviour. Candidates underwent an oral pathology examination and a full-mouth probing using a standardize pressure (20N) probe SONDA PA_ON (Orange Dental®, Aspachstr, Biberach, Germany) to determine their periodontal and peri-implant status. All statistical analyses were performed with the package RStudio (V2.5). Descriptive characteristics regarding all the covariates were summarized. Periimplant bone loss (95% Confidence Interval - 95% CI) were calculated both at implant- and at patient-level. A multilevel regression model will be applied to evaluate the influence of some risk/protective indicators on the risk for peri-implant bone loss. Risk/protective indicators for periimplantitis will be studied using multilevel (mixed-effects) multivariate regression analyses (patient- and implant-level). Each potential indicator was tested individually by adding it to an empty model having as dependent variable the peri-implant status and testing the significance.
In this study, concentrated growth factor obtained by centrifuging the patient's own blood and advanced platelet-rich fibrin liquids were applied to the implant cavity and surface. Thus, it was aimed to ensure that the osseointegration process would start earlier by ensuring a faster arrival of growth factor and healing mediators in the region, and thus, the time waited for the osseointegration process and the loading of the superstructure would be shortened. In this split-mouth study, a total of 32 patients including two separate study groups in different patients and a control group were included. While the CGF liquid was applied to the implant cavities and surfaces prepared in the study group of 16 patients, A-PRF liquid was applied to the study group of the other 16 patients. Conventional implant application was performed in the control groups of both groups. The torque values during the implantation were also recorded, and Resonance Frequency measurements were performed immediately after implantation with the Penguin RFA device and at postoperative weeks 2, 4, 6 and 12.
Platelet concentrates obtained from blood have been used as regenerative biomaterials in periodontal surgery. Along with the migration and proliferation of osteogenic cells, platelets accelerate bone regeneration by increasing the formation of blood vessels and inducing inflammatory reactions. Experimental studies revealed that growth factors released from platelets enhance osteoblastic differentiation on the implant surface, and enlarge the contact surface of the bone and implant. Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), a platelet concentrate, was introduced by Choukroun in 2001, and it contains a significant amount of cytokines. Advanced-platelet rich fibrin (A-PRF), discovered in 2014, is a PRF derivative with a denser leukocyte concentration and a softer consistency. Concentrated growth factor (CGF), another platelet derivative, differs from A-PRF since it contains many concentrated growth factors trapped in a more rigid fibrin structure. It was reported that both A-PRF and CGF, obtained with variable centrifuge speeds, accelerated the proliferation and differentiation of bone cells. Stimulated osteoblasts and osteocytes initiate the remodelling process by producing macrophage colony-stimulating factor and receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL).Previous studies reported that TNF-α initiated bone resorption independently of RANKL.Osteoprotegerin (OPG) is a soluble cytokine receptor of the TNF family and is produced by osteoblasts, fibroblasts, and a number of host cells. OPG binds to RANKL and prevents the RANKL-RANK interaction Therefore, it inhibits osteoclastic activity. The RANKL/OPG ratio is used as an indicator for estimating bone remodelling, osteoclastic activity, or osteogenesis. The interactions among cytokines, growth factors, chemokines, and chemical mediators during blood clot formation result in a complex signalling process. High concentrations of cytokines and growth factors in the wound promote the migration of macrophages, neutrophils, and lymphocytes. Therefore, it was reported that the cytokines released from the fibrin matrix might affect those signaling pathways. In this study, investigators hypothesised that the application of CGF or A-PRF in dental implantation would contribute to inflammation, proliferation and the remodeling process. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effects of CGF and A-PRF on the osseointegration of dental implants in clinical, radiographic, and biochemical aspects.
Alveolar bone resorption often occurs after tooth extraction. At present, guided bone regeneration technique is widely used in clinic since it leads to less trauma and less complications. Tenting screw technology, basic on the classical GBR, implants screws into the surgical area to prevent the barrier membrane from collapsing. Moreover, advanced platelet rich fibrin and injectable platelet-rich fibrin are used to provide the osteogenic function. The investigators intend to increase vertical alveolar bone augmentation by combining tenting screws and A-PRF, I-PRF.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the survival rate of 5 mm short implants compared to longer implants (10 mm) placed in sinus-grafted sites. Primary aim: Compare bone loss between the two groups Secondary aim: Compare surgical time and patient-reported outcomes (satisfaction and post-operative pain)
The present study is a human, prospective, parallel, randomised controlled clinical trial conducted to explore the efficacy of injectable PRF around dental implants. The trial is in accordance with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) criteria, 2010.
Tooth autotransplantation is a treatment option to replace tooth with imposible prognosis. In several cases the receipt site has a reduced bone dimension. This situation may be imposible the treatment with dental implants without bone reconstruction. Autotransplantation seem to improve the anatomic characteristic of the receipt site without any reconstruction approach. The aim of this study is to evaluate the bone dimension changes followed autotransplantation treatment.
Comparative study for evaluation of vertical bone gain after one stage ridge augmentation with advanced platelet rich fibrin (A-PRF) and xenograft versus guided bone regeneration using collagen membrane and xenograft.
This study designed as a randomized controlled split-mouth trial will be conducted at the Dental Clinic of the University of Valencia. The aim will be to assess differences in clinical, radiological and microbiological outcomes between implants with 2 different connections: internal hexagon and conical connection. Following the premises, to minimize the bias related to prosthetic phase and maximize the effect of connections on MBL changes, a 1abutment-1time protocol will be used. The study hypothesis is that there will be no statistically significant differences between both implant connections.
Together with materials and type of retention, the stability of the implant abutment connection represents one of the key factor for the success rate of an implant supported restoration. The recent diffusion of high quality and easy to use CAD/CAM systems has contributed to market launch of a number of competing companies that offer the so called "clonical" or "compatible" restorative components. Although they are claimed to be identical, the original abutments are supposed to present maximum accuracy and consequently lower microleakage. The aim of the present randomized controlled trial will be to analyze the implant abutment junction stability comparing implant-supported crowns restored with original components and compatible non-original abutments. The hypothesis is that original components will present significantly better stability than non-original abutments.