Clinical Trials Logo

Bone Augmentation clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Bone Augmentation.

Filter by:
  • Completed  
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT05612737 Completed - Bone Loss, Alveolar Clinical Trials

Evaluation of a Novel Horizontal Ridge Augmentation Technique in Dentistry

Start date: October 1, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This case series aimed to assess the efficacy of a novel horizontal ridge augmentation modality using histomorphometry and Raman spectroscopy. Combinations of "sticky bone" and tenting screws without autologous bone were used as augmentative materials.

NCT ID: NCT04775940 Completed - Bone Augmentation Clinical Trials

Use of Perforated Barrier Membranes and IPRF Nano- Micro Sticky Bone

Start date: March 1, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Comparing amount of horizontal bone gain 4 months after alveolar ridge augmentation using IPRF Nano- micro Sticky Bone with perforated collagen membrane versus occlusive barrier membrane by : 1. clinical and Radiographic analysis . 2. Histomorphometric analysis .

NCT ID: NCT04462575 Completed - Bone Augmentation Clinical Trials

Reconstruction of Atrophic Maxillary Ridges Using Mandibular Blocks With and Without Coverage Using Collagen Membrane

Start date: April 15, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Is the use of collagen membrane on top of particulate bone mixture covered by onlay bone block in Maxilla better than the use of mixture of particulate bone covered by onlay bone block without the use of collagen membrane, in terms of bone quality and bone quantity?

NCT ID: NCT02154386 Completed - Bone Augmentation Clinical Trials

Effect of Healing Time on New Bone Formation Following Tooth Extraction and Ridge Preservation With Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft

Start date: October 2013
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Bone grafting following tooth extraction is commonly performed to preserve bony ridge dimensions adequate to support subsequent implant placement. Alveolar ridge resorption commonly occurs following tooth extraction, and the decrease in bone volume has the potential to make dental implant therapy impossible without surgery to reconstruct the ridge. The aim of ridge preservation grafting is to prevent or minimize this resorptive process, thereby preserving an adequate volume of bone for implant placement. Ridge preservation generally involves placement of a particulate bone graft material in the tooth socket, followed by use of a membrane or similar substance over the socket entrance to contain the bone graft. Various grafting materials have been recommended for these ridge preservation procedures, including demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA). The timing of dental implant placement following ridge preservation procedures is controversial, and few studies have examined the effects of different healing time intervals between ridge preservation and implant placement. The purpose of this project is to evaluate the formation of new bone at a site where tooth extraction has been performed followed by grafting using DFDBA. Two different study groups are included, one having the dental implant placed 8-10 weeks after tooth extraction and ridge grafting, the other having the dental implant placed 18-20 weeks after extraction and grafting.