Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

Customized bone blocks need CBCT and digital software to design the block needed to rehabilitate. Some advantages are reduced surgical time and better adaptation of the graft, leading to less complications. Objectives: The primary aim of this study is to determine the bone regeneration capacity through a histological study and the bone volumetric changes of allograft bone blocks in the posterior site of the mandible. The secondary outcome will be to assess the survival and success rate of dental implants placed in the allograft regenerated area. Materials and Methods: After studying the CBCT to regenerate the posterior sites of the mandible, the investigators will design CAD/CAM freeze- dried bone allograft to fit exactly on the defect morphology that the patients present. A full thickness flap will be released to have a correct access of the defects. The sterile blocks have to fit perfectly on the defect and fixed by screws. Covered with resorbable membranes fixed with pines and suture. 4 months later, 2nd CBCTwill be performed. During the implant surgery, a bone trephine will be removed and sent into a Laboratory to make a histological study of the bone block for histomorphometry. After 3 months, second-stage surgery and healing caps will be placed if needed. Impressions will be taken 2 weeks after to perform the final crowns.


Clinical Trial Description

Allogenic bone blocks are a great bone regeneration technique option comparing to autologous regeneration treatments. There are several techniques of vertical guided bone regeneration but also have a large number of complications and failures. Some of the advantages of Customized Allograft Bone Blocks are: less invasive, causes less morbidity and resorption of the recipient site. Non resorbable membranes with particulate grafting material and autologous bone blocks are technically demanding and difficult to achieve stability to create new bone. Customized bone blocks need CBCT and digital software to design the block needed to rehabilitate. It is important to place the implants in an ideal prosthetic position to achieve excellent long-term results. Implant supported prosthesis can be contraindicated because of the lack of bone. Looking in to the classification of CAWOOD and HOWEL type 5 bone need bone augmentation techniques. In some cases, increasing the difficulty with the superficialization of the alveolar nerve. Some advantages are reduced surgical time and better adaptation of the graft, leading to less complications. The use of autogenous bone increases the risk of damaging anatomical structures increasing the morbidity, however thanks to allograft the investigators can avoid these problems. There are many different types of allografts, fresh-frozen bone (FFBA), freeze-dried bone (FDBA), demineralised freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) and mineralised processed bone (MPBA). The allograft used for this study is a cellular cancellous bone material mechanically and chemically processed and sterilised by irradiation. This allogenic biomaterial has an osteoconductive property which facilitates the cell migration and proliferation for neoformation. Study design A prospective controlled clinical trial will be conducted. Residents of the International Master in Oral Surgery will perform the surgical and prosthodontic final rehabilitation procedures. All the included patients will sign an appropriate inform prior to any study-related actions. Firstly, an intraoral digital impression with intraoral scanner will be taken and a diagnostic wax-up will be performed. Subsequently, a cone-beam computed tomography scan would be taken in the specific area to be treated. After studying the CBCT to regenerate the posterior sites of the mandible, the investigators will design CAD/CAM freeze- dried bone allograft to fit exactly on the defect morphology that the patients present. A full thickness flap will be released to have a correct access of the defects. Releasing incisions will be performed to achieve the correct closure of the flap. The sterile blocks have to fit perfectly on the defect and fixed by screws. Covered with resorbable membranes fixed with pines and suture. 4 months later, photographs, periapical xrays digital impressions and 2nd CBCT will be performed. During the implant surgery, a bone trephine will be removed and sent into a Laboratory to make a histological study of the bone block for histomorphometry. After 3 months, second-stage surgery and healing caps will be placed if needed. Impressions will be taken 2 weeks after to perform the final crowns. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT05937035
Study type Interventional
Source Universitat Internacional de Catalunya
Contact JAVIER GAMON VIDAL
Phone +34627321249
Email jgamon@uic.es
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
Start date May 25, 2024
Completion date July 25, 2025

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Not yet recruiting NCT05519592 - Proximal Lower Limb Intramuscular Block : Effects on Hemiparetic Gait N/A
Completed NCT04548076 - Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block in Vertebral Surgery
Completed NCT04094987 - Interfascial Pressure Into Ultrasound Guided Anterior Quadratus Lumborum Block Application N/A
Recruiting NCT06247592 - Pulse Radiofrequency and Occipital Nerve Block for Chronic Migraine Patients N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04544423 - Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block in Knee Prosthesis
Recruiting NCT05643040 - Comparison of Perioperative Analgesic Efficacy of Femoral Nerve Block, Adductor Canal Block and 4in1 Block N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03799068 - Suprazygomatic Nerve Block vs Surgical Site Infiltration in Cleft Palate Repair N/A
Completed NCT03954249 - Evaluating the Effectiveness of Bilateral ESPB in Addition to Standard Analgesia at Reducing Opioid Consumption N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06097286 - A Comparative Study Between Ultrasound Guided External Oblique Intercostal Plane (EOIP) Block and Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Upper Abdominal Surgeries N/A
Completed NCT05278598 - 3 Ultrasound Guided Plane Blocks for Perioperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy N/A
Recruiting NCT04830280 - Effect Posterior QLB on Atelectasis N/A
Completed NCT04824833 - Effects of US-guided SAPB During Breast Surgery N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06423677 - Analgesic Efficacy of Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane (SPSIP) Block in Shoulder Arthroscopies N/A
Withdrawn NCT05237479 - Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block in Direct Anterior Approach to Total Hip Arthroplasty N/A
Completed NCT04733313 - Effect of Quadratus Lumborum Block in C/S N/A
Withdrawn NCT04077398 - Volume vs Concentration: Quadratus Lumborum Blocks With High Volume/Low Concentration or Low Volume/ High Concentration in Nephrectomies Phase 4
Completed NCT03024697 - Single-shot Pectoral Plane(PECs) Block Versus Continuous Local Anaesthetic Infusion Analgesia or Both PECS Block and Local Anaesthetic Infusion After Breast Surgery: A Prospective Randomised, Double-blind Trial Phase 4
Completed NCT01740453 - Effect of Interscalene Block on Ventilatory Function Phase 4
Recruiting NCT06265402 - Retrolaminar Block Versus Tab Block in Abdomioasty N/A
Completed NCT05888285 - Erector Spina Plane Block and Radiofrequency Treatmen N/A