Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT00403143
Other study ID # 06/Opa/23
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received November 22, 2006
Last updated May 11, 2007
Start date October 2006

Study information

Verified date May 2007
Source London North West Healthcare NHS Trust
Contact Amynah Goawalla, BSc, MBBS MRCOphth
Phone 020 963
Email amynahgoawalla@nwlh.nhs.uk
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority United Kingdom: National Health Service
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

To measure colour vision in patients with a blue light filtering lens implant in one eye and non-tinted implant in the other eye (and compared this group with a control group with bilateral non-tinted implants) and to determine whether blue light filtering lenses limit colour vision


Description:

As we all age, the natural lens inside our eyes becomes denser, hazy and more yellow in colour. In other words, cataracts develop. In order to enable clear vision again, cataract surgery is performed. This involves removing the natural lens from the eye and replacing it with a synthetic lens implant inside the eye. Cataract surgery with insertion of a lens implant was first done in 1948 but didn't become routine until the early 1980s. Around this time, awareness about the harmful effects of UV light were raised and by 1986, lens implants routinely had a UV filter incorporated into them.1 As early as 1992, a study examining patients who had had a high occupational exposure to blue and visible light, concluded that there is a positive association between long term exposure to visible light and age related wear and tear change at the back of the eye, termed age related macular degeneration (AMD).2 This theory was supported by several studies which have reported an increased rate of progression of AMD in patients after cataract surgery with a clear lens implant (It is known that clear lens implants transmit more blue light to the back of the eye compared with the natural aging lens).3 Laboratory studies in 2000 showed that blue light causes damage to aging retinal cells (the nerve cells at the back of the eye which are important in enabling us to see), more so than green light or white light.4 Experimental studies with rats also showed that exposure to blue light was 30 times more damaging to retinal cells compared with yellow light.5 A further laboratory study in 2004 confirmed that by protecting aging retinal cells with a blue light filtering lens, damage caused by blue light is prevented.6 Yellow tinted, blue light filtering lens implants have been in production since 1991, first by Hoya in Tokyo and now by Alcon as well. Alcon produce the Acrysof Natural lens implant which has been designed to mimic the 53 year old natural lens and which received FDA and CE approval in 2003. To date, over 2 million of these lenses have been implanted in patients world wide.7 Although these lens implants are sometimes used in patients having cataract surgery in the UK, this is not yet routine. One of the concerns about them is whether or not they limit colour vision in any way. There have been some studies examining this and so far, none of them have found a statistically significant difference in the colour vision between patients with non-tinted lens implants and blue-filtering lens implants.8,9,10 However, none of the studies thus far, have employed colour vision testing with an anomaloscope (which is considered to be the gold standard colour vision test).11 In addition, none of them have taken into account the level of capsular opacification (the capsule is a cling film bag-like structure that supports the lens implant inside the eye and can over a period of time, become thickened and hazy following cataract surgery) and the level of macular pigment (yellow pigment which we have on the centre part of the back of our eyes which is thought to contribute towards filtering blue light) in patients' eyes.

Age related macular degeneration is already the commonest cause of blindness in the UK. It is a growing problem, particularly with our aging population and increasing levels of ambient light which we are exposed to in our daily lives. Although the evidence is strongly in favour of filtering blue light and the need for protective measures against AMD are pressing, we need to be satisfied that there are no adverse effects of blocking blue from our lives.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 40
Est. completion date
Est. primary completion date
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- patients who have had uncomplicated cataract surgery in one eye and have a cataract in the other eye

- patients who are over 18 years of age

- patients who are fully able to independently give consent to have surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

- patients who have any other ocular co-morbidity that may account for reduction in vision in either eye (as this may confound the condition)

- patients who are colour blind

- patients who suffered previous post-operative complications

- patients under 18

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Single Blind, Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
cataract surgery


Locations

Country Name City State
United Kingdom North West London Hospitals NHS Trust London

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
London North West Healthcare NHS Trust

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United Kingdom, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary To objectively determine whether colour vision is reduced with a blue-light filtering
Primary intraocular lens compared with a colourless intraocular implant in cataract surgery
Secondary To determine whether patients subjectively are able to tell whether they have been
Secondary implanted with yellow tinted intraocular lens during their cataract surgery or colourless one
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Active, not recruiting NCT02393118 - A Study to Evaluate the BrainPort Vision Device in Individuals Blinded by Traumatic Injury N/A
Terminated NCT00262509 - Emergency Egress and Information System for Persons With Vision Loss N/A
Terminated NCT00691444 - Blind Child Melatonin Treatment Study N/A
Recruiting NCT06237829 - Testing Tactile Aids With Blind Subjects N/A
Completed NCT00829036 - Wayfinding Information Access System for People With Vision Loss N/A
Completed NCT02643238 - Continued Study of Artificial Vision: Evaluation of the BrainPort® System and Investigation of Visual Ambulation N/A
Completed NCT01488786 - A Study to Evaluate the BrainPort® Vision Device in Subjects Who Are Blind N/A
Recruiting NCT06451172 - Novel Antisense Oligonucleotide Eye Drops for Treating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacterial Keratitis Early Phase 1
Recruiting NCT04725760 - Evaluation of the Efficacy of the BrainPort Vision Pro on the Performance of Daily Activities in the Profoundly Blind French Population N/A
Recruiting NCT02983370 - Development of a Cortical Visual Neuroprosthesis for the Blind N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06070467 - Holistic Mixed Approaches to Capture the Real Life of Children With Rare Eye Diseases
Completed NCT00920231 - Computer Vision System for the Blind Veteran Phase 1
Completed NCT01109576 - Workshops for Veterans With Vision and Hearing Loss Phase 0
Terminated NCT00795236 - Melatonin Studies of Totally Blind Children N/A
Terminated NCT00634972 - Efficient Study of ACULAR in Inhibiting Proliferative Retinopathy in Prematurity Phase 4
Enrolling by invitation NCT06364605 - MySpace: the Role of Vision in Representing Space N/A
Terminated NCT03913130 - Extension Study to Study PQ-110-001 (NCT03140969) Phase 1/Phase 2
Not yet recruiting NCT05806684 - Hyperbilirubinemia and Retinopathy of Prematurity in Preterm Infants: a Retrospective Study.
Completed NCT03753893 - Ocular Manifestations in Rheumatic Diseases
Recruiting NCT04855045 - An Open-label, Dose Escalation and Double-masked, Randomized, Controlled Trial Evaluating Safety and Tolerability of Sepofarsen in Children (<8 Years of Age) With LCA10 Caused by Mutations in the CEP290 Gene. Phase 2/Phase 3