Comparison of the Short-term Outcomes of Using DST & PPH Staplers in

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

The hemorrhoidal disease affects approximately 4.4%-36% of the general population, and it has been estimated that >50% of the population aged >50 years experiences hemorrhoidal problems . Traditional hemorrhoidectomy, including Milligan-Morgan, Ferguson, and Whitehead procedures , are known to cause significant postoperative pain and discomfort and result in a poor quality of life after operation. Since the first introduction of the novel procedure hemorrhoidopexy by Longo in 1998, it has been considered as a safe procedure causing less postoperative pain and resulting in earlier recovery; furthermore, the patients are able to resume their normal daily life and work. The PPH stapler (Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. Cincinnati, OH, USA) was also first introduced in 1998 as a device to perform this procedure. Subsequently, a new device, the DST stapler (Covidien, Mansfield, MA, USA), was introduced in 2008 with some structural differences, including a detachable anvil, three anchor points over different levels, a larger case, and different agraffe sizes.

However, the majority of current studies have been focusing on the use of PPH stapler for hemorrhoidopexy, and comparison with the DST stapler has been rarely discussed. One randomized controlled trial that compared between the PPH stapler and the DST stapler reported that the DST stapler demonstrated a better hemostatic ability and allowed the resection of a larger area of mucosal prolapse; however, that trial focused only on bleeding among the postoperative complications. Currently, only a limited number of studies have compared these two devices in terms of pain, complications, and anorectal stricture incidence rate. The present investigation is a matched cohort-control study aimed to compare the postoperative short-term outcomes among patients with grade III and IV hemorrhoids who were treated with either the PPH or the DST stapler. The specimen surface area and the relationships with complications were also analyzed.

Clinical Trial Description

n/a

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT04058223
Study type	Observational
Source	Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase
Start date	September 5, 2018
Completion date	April 5, 2019

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Completed	`NCT03678168` - A Comparison Between Conventional Throat Packs and Pharyngeal Placement of Tampons in Rhinology Surgeries	N/A
Completed	`NCT05669313` - The Effects of Hypothermia and Acidosis on Coagulation During Treatment With Rivaroxaban Measured With ROTEM
Completed	`NCT04590898` - Peri-device Leakage Closure After LAAO
Active, not recruiting	`NCT05563883` - Atrial Fibrillation and Cancer: a Nationwide French Cohort Study
Not yet recruiting	`NCT04537533` - Tranexamic Acid Infusion in Low Dose Versus in High Dose for Reducing Blood Loss in Radical Cystectomy Operations	Phase 4
Withdrawn	`NCT02851940` - Pain and Bleeding Following Hypertonic Saline Sclerotherapy Compared to Brand Ligation for Symptomatic Hemorrhoids	N/A
Completed	`NCT02722720` - Carotid Arteries Stenting Complications: Transradial Approach Versus Transfemoral	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT02279186` - Effectiveness of Intravenous Tranexamic Acid in Reducing Blood Loss During and After Cesarean Section	Phase 4
Active, not recruiting	`NCT02244853` - Heart Rate and Cardiovascular Diseases Prognosis in People With Stable Coronary Artery Disease	N/A
Completed	`NCT02092415` - Assessment of Limb Perfusion During Junctional Tourniquet	N/A
Completed	`NCT02245854` - Efficacy and Safety of a New Polypectomy Snare for Cold-polypectomy for Small Colorectal Polyps	N/A
Completed	`NCT02980497` - Antiplaque/Antigingivitis Efficacy of Essential Oil Mouthrinses in Six-Month Study	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT01438736` - Is Cerazette Use Before Nexplanon Insertion Predictive for Bleeding Pattern?	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT00515541` - Lovaza's Effect on the Activation of Platelets	Phase 2
Completed	`NCT00143715` - Oral Vitamin K for Warfarin Associated Coagulopathy	Phase 3
Terminated	`NCT03954314` - DEPOSITION - Decreasing Postoperative Blood Loss by Topical vs. Intravenous Tranexamic Acid in Open Cardiac Surgery	Phase 3
Recruiting	`NCT05945680` - Tranexamic Acid in Breast Esthetic Surgery.	Phase 4
Recruiting	`NCT03783182` - Betamethasone (Betapred®) as Premedication for Reducing Postoperative Vomiting and Pain After Tonsillectomy	Phase 4
Not yet recruiting	`NCT05464394` - Peroperative Administration of Tranexamic Acid in Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and One-anastomosis Gastric Bypass	Phase 3
Recruiting	`NCT03568890` - Short-Term Anticoagulation Versus Antiplatelet Therapy for Preventing Device Thrombosis Following Left Atrial Appendage Closure	Phase 4

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

Comparison of the Short-term Outcomes of Using DST and PPH Staplers in the Treatment of Grade III and IV Hemorrhoids

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms