Clinical Trials Logo

BK Nephropathy clinical trials

View clinical trials related to BK Nephropathy.

Filter by:
  • None
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT06065852 Recruiting - Fabry Disease Clinical Trials

National Registry of Rare Kidney Diseases

RaDaR
Start date: November 6, 2009
Phase:
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

The goal of this National Registry is to is to collect information from patients with rare kidney diseases, so that it that can be used for research. The purpose of this research is to: - Develop Clinical Guidelines for specific rare kidney diseases. These are written recommendations on how to diagnose and treat a medical condition. - Audit treatments and outcomes. An audit makes checks to see if what should be done is being done and asks if it could be done better. - Further the development of future treatments. Participants will be invited to participate on clinical trials and other studies. The registry has the capacity to feedback relevant information to patients and in conjunction with Patient Knows Best (Home - Patients Know Best), allows patients to provide information themselves, including their own reported quality of life and outcome measures.

NCT ID: NCT01649609 Completed - BK Viremia Clinical Trials

Using mTOR Inhibitors in the Prevention of BK Nephropathy

Start date: March 2012
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

BK virus infections after kidney transplant are increasing and can result in damage to the transplanted kidney. Currently, the universally accepted treatment is to decrease the strength of the antirejection medications but it is unclear what medications should be lowered and to what extent. The investigators propose to perform a study with patients who have BK virus detected in their blood during routine screening that appears to be increasing. The investigators will use two different strategies that involve different combinations of standard anti-rejection medications at lower dosages. Patients will be assigned to one of the two groups in a random manner across the two hospitals participating in the study. Patients will be followed for at least a year to determine if one strategy was more effective than the other in preventing an increase in the number of viruses in the blood stream and whether either one was more effective in reducing the negative impact of the infection on the functioning of the transplanted kidney.