Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Active, not recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05708183 |
Other study ID # |
101534IC |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Active, not recruiting |
Phase |
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
January 15, 2023 |
Est. completion date |
February 28, 2025 |
Study information
Verified date |
September 2022 |
Source |
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Observational
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Background: This programme effectiveness study responds to the need for evidence on the
effect on birthweight of switching from iron-folic acid supplementation (IFA) to multiple
micronutrient supplementation (MMS) as part of routine antenatal care in Ethiopia. A 2019
meta-analysis of trial data reported a mean improvement of 35g in newborn birthweight amongst
newborns born to women who took MMS in pregnancy compared to those who took IFA. Responding
to this evidence, in 2020 the World Health Organisation updated its global guideline on MMS
from 'not recommended' to 'recommended in the context of rigorous research'. The guideline
identifies priority research being 'to establish the impact of switching routine antenatal
IFA to MMS on important health outcomes, equity, acceptability, feasibility, sustainability
and health-care resources in different country settings.' In 2022 the Ministry of Health of
Ethiopia (MoH), will change from MMS to IFA in a set of pilot districts. EPHI and LSHTM have
been asked to evaluate the effect of this change on mean birthweight and propose the current
trial for this purpose.
The overall aim is to evaluate the programme effectiveness on mean birthweight of providing
MMS as part of routine antenatal care, compared to providing IFA.
Findings will support the MoH to make evidence-informed decisions about the large-scale
implementation of MMS in Ethiopia and also contribute to the global evidence base on the
effectiveness of MMS in a programmatic setting.
Methods: A two-arm cluster randomized trial will be used to estimate the effect of the
programme change on mean birthweight, with cost-effectiveness and process evaluations
embedded in the trial design.
Women aged 15-49 who deliver a live born child in a study district health facility
(mother/infant dyads) will be eligible for enrolment in the study.
The primary outcome measure will be birthweight, recorded in facilities at the time of birth
as part of the routine maternity care.
Secondary objectives include costs of providing MMS, acceptability of MMS, adherence to
antenatal micronutrient supplementation and implementation challenges.
Description:
AIM: The overall aim of the MMS evaluation is to evaluate the programme effectiveness on
birthweight of providing MMS as part of routine antenatal care, relative to providing IFA.
STUDY DESIGN: This program effectiveness study includes a cluster randomized trial to
estimate the effect of MMS on the primary outcome, birthweight, with embedded cost and
process evaluations to measure the secondary objectives.
The overall study design is built around a two-arm, facility-based, cluster randomized trial
with district as the unit of randomization (the cluster), whereby districts are randomized to
a comparison arm that continues to deliver iron-folic acid supplementation (IFA) as part of
the standard antenatal care package, or to an intervention arm where IFA is removed from the
standard antenatal care package and replaced with multi-micronutrient supplementation (MMS).
STUDY PERIOD: The entire MMS evaluation will continue for 36 months, starting in March 2022.
During 2022, permissions will be obtained and protocols written. At the start of 2023, a
baseline facility survey will be implemented to collect the primary outcome birthweight data
plus data for the secondary objectives. An endline facility survey will be approximately 24
months after baseline.
LOCATION: The evaluation will be done in 42 districts in five regions of Ethiopia. The
districts were selected by the Ethiopian Ministry of Health as a pilot area to implement the
switch from MMS to IFA as part of routine care, with the intention of also permitting the RCT
evaluation of that switch.
42 Districts in detail: Gambella Region (2 districts): Itang especial woreda; Godere;
Somali Region (4 districts): Kebribaya; Ararso; Awbare; Aware;
Oromia Region (20 districts): Gursum; Deder; Goba Koricha; Bele Gesgar; Rayitu; Dodola;
Wondo; Kersa; Ejere; Gimbichu; Gemechis; Adami Tulu Jido; Sire; Guna; Medawelabu; Dire;
Arero; Becho; Jimma Arjo; Ejersa Lafoo;
Southern Nations Nationalities, and People's Region (12 districts): Sodo; Enemor; Shahsego;
Chencha Zuria; Atote Ulo; South Ari; Duguna Fango; Kachabira Bira; Silti; Wonago; Zala; Karat
Zuria;
Sidama Region (4 districts): Shebedino; Dara; Aleta chuko; Bona Zuria;
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: The primary objective is to estimate the effect of MMS implementation on
the mean birthweight of babies born in government health facilities to women living in areas
where MMS is implemented, relative to the mean birthweight of babies born in government
health facilities to women living in areas where standard antenatal IFA supplementation is
implemented.
PRIMARY OUTCOME: Birthweight measured as part of routine maternity care in enrolled
facilities will be measured during baseline and endline facilty surveys in intervention and
comparison areas.
The facility survey protocol for recording the primary outcome, birthweight, will align with
routine practices in health facility maternity wards whereby midwives routinely document
birthweight. Digital scales will be provided to facilities for this purpose, replacing manual
scales. The study team will work with midwives to ensure training in appropriate use of
digital scales, accurate recording of birthweight in grammes to four digits, and continuous
quality control measures including scale calibration.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
- To estimate the cost and cost-effectiveness of the MMS intervention
- To investigate the processes of MMS implementation including addressing questions about
how delivery is achieved and what is actually delivered (fidelity, dose, adaptations,
reach and context) and the mechanisms of impact (how providers and clients respond to
MMS and any unanticipated pathways or consequences)
- To assess the acceptability and adherence of MMS
SECONDARY ANALYSES AND OBJECTIVES: During the baseline and endline facility surveys
additional data collection tools will be used including: (i) a structured tool to capture
information about the characteristics of and antenatal care received by women who are
included in the primary outcome analysis; (ii) a structured tool to collect data on costs of
implementing MMS; (iii) a structured facility readiness assessment to collect data on
availability of services, supplies and trained staff (iv) semi-structured interviews with
facility staff on their experience of providing antenatal care services; (v) semi-structured
exit interviews with facility users on their experience of using antenatal care services.
In addition, during the interval between baseline and endline, a system that aligns with
routine reporting will be developed to capture monitoring data on implementation processes,
births, and birthweights. The need for additional qualitative interviews with health care
users and health care providers to explore emerging topics regarding adherence and
acceptability will be reviewed together with the implementation team when implementation has
begun and after analysis of baseline data collection.
STUDY POPULATION: For the primary outcome, the study population are mother/infant dyads who
are resident in study districts and who access childbirth care in the health centres of those
districts. For the secondary objectives there are two study populations: (i) the health staff
providing antenatal care services in health centres and (ii) currently pregnant women
accessing antenatal care there.