Biopsy, Fine-Needle Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Prospective Comparison of Digital Image Analysis and Routine Cytology for the Identification of Pancreatic Neoplasia in Patient Undergoing EUS-FNA
Verified date | September 2016 |
Source | Changhai Hospital |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | China: Ethics Committee |
Study type | Interventional |
150 patients who had suspected pancreatic malignancy were planed to be enrolled in this study. Equal cytological samples of each patient undergoing EUS-FNA were examined by digital image analysis and conventional cytology respectively. The investigators aim to compare the efficacy of DIA and conventional cytology in diagnosing pancreatic cancer. Further more, the investigators also collected the blood sample of each enrolled patient for advanced study.
Status | Active, not recruiting |
Enrollment | 150 |
Est. completion date | |
Est. primary completion date | October 2016 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 18 Years to 90 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: 1. who had known or suspected pancreatic malignancy and 2. in whom the endosonographer deemed the target lesion safe and feasible to allow the necessary study passes. Exclusion Criteria: 1. not willing to sign informed consent, 2. cells obtained from FNA for DNA ploidy test less than 200, and/or 3. patients do not cooperate with follow-up. |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Investigator), Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
China | Shanghai Changhai Hospital | Shanghai | Shanghai |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Changhai Hospital |
China,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Proportion of participants with accurate diagnosis by conventional cytology versus by DNA ploidy test | 12 months | No | |
Secondary | sensitivity of conventional cytology Versus DNA ploidy test in the diagnosis of pancreatic malignancy | 12 months | No | |
Secondary | specificity of conventional cytology Versus DNA ploidy test in the diagnosis of pancreatic malignancy | 12 months | No | |
Secondary | positive predictive value of conventional cytology Versus DNA ploidy test in the diagnosis of pancreatic malignancy | 12 months | No | |
Secondary | negative predictive value of conventional cytology Versus DNA ploidy test in the diagnosis of pancreatic malignancy | 12 months | No |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03622229 -
EUS-FNB for Solid Pancreatic Lesions: Side-fenestrated Vs Fork-tip Needle
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03322592 -
EUS-FNB With ROSE Vs. EUS-FNB Without ROSE
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04164017 -
Impact of Suction in the EUS-guided Fine Needle Biopsy of Solid Pancreatic Lesions
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01316614 -
EUS-guided Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA) With and Without the Use of a Stylet
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT05804435 -
iNodâ„¢ Ultrasound-Guided Needle Biopsy System Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02832284 -
iNod System Human Feasibility Assessment
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05993429 -
Diagnostic Efficacy of EUS-FNA/B Versus ERCP With or Without POCS-TB in Patients With Suspected Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma
|