Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04902430
Other study ID # FUE.REC (8)/6-2019
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date December 29, 2020
Est. completion date August 12, 2022

Study information

Verified date December 2022
Source Future University in Egypt
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

There's a scarcity in literature concerning en-masse retraction and its effect on the rate of tooth movement. The purpose of this study is to determine, In orthodontic patients with maxillary protrusion, which form of mechanics in en-masse retraction offers a faster rate of retraction; Friction or Frictionless Mechanics.


Description:

The en-masse technique can be done in one of two ways: through friction or frictionless mechanics. Both are viable options, but, ideally, we want to retract and complete the orthodontic treatment as quickly as possible, in order to decrease the negative effects that may occur during treatment. Which of these mechanics results in a decreased treatment time is still up for debate.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 30
Est. completion date August 12, 2022
Est. primary completion date July 18, 2022
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 14 Years to 24 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Adults and Adolescent patients (both genders) - Age range (14-24) - Patients with maxillary protrusion requiring first premolars extraction (Bimaxillary Protrusion or Class II division 1 cases). - Patients with fully erupted permanent teeth (not necessarily including the third molar). - Cases requiring maximum anchorage during retraction. - Good general and oral health Exclusion Criteria: - Patients suffering from any systemic diseases interfering with tooth movement. - Patients with extracted or missing permanent teeth. (except for third molars). - Patients with badly decayed teeth. - Patients with any parafunctional habits (i.e. Bruxism, tongue thrusting, mouth breathing, etc…). - Patients with previous orthodontic treatment

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
Power chain and Crimpable hook for En-Masse Retraction
Retraction will start on a 0.017"x0.025" Stainless steel wire using elastomeric chain (force applied will be 212 g per side) extending between the crimpable hooks and the miniscrew
T- Loop
Closing retraction T-loops will be fabricated using 0.017 x 0.025 TMA wire. The loop will be positioned halfway the extraction space and the canine

Locations

Country Name City State
Egypt Future University in Egypt New Cairo Cairo

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Future University in Egypt

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Egypt, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Retraction Rate The antero-posterior movement of anterior teeth and first molars will be assessed by measuring the digitilized study models taken of the patients monthly (measured in mm) From pre to post retraction (an average of 6 - 8 months)
Secondary Anchorage Loss Digitilized dental models taken before and after the completion of retraction will be measured by identifying landmarks and reference lines and planes (measured in mm) From pre to post retraction (an average of 6 - 8 months)
Secondary Molar Rotation Study models that are taken pre and post retraction (then digitilized) will be used to assess the rotation of the maxillary first molars in relation to a reference line (measurement of the angles in degrees) From pre to post retraction (an average of 6 - 8 months)
Secondary Pain of intervention Each patient will fill a questionnaire regarding his treatment experience in a VAS scoring from 1-10 From pre to post retraction/intervention (an average of 6 - 8 months)
Secondary Anterior teeth torque, extrusion/intrusion The principle investigator will examine pre and post lateral cephalometric radiographs in relation to lines and reference planes (measurements in degrees and mm) From pre to post retraction (an average of 6 - 8 months)
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04383600 - Flapless Mops for Acceleration of Canine Retraction N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT05150665 - Evaluation of Mini and Macro-esthetics Following En- Masse Retraction Versus Two Step Retraction N/A
Completed NCT04868721 - Evaluation of Two Approaches of Micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) During Orthodontic Canine Retraction N/A
Completed NCT04631419 - Effects of Flapless Laser Corticotomy in Canine Retraction N/A
Completed NCT04878939 - Evaluation of Incisors' Position Following Anterior Segment Retraction N/A
Completed NCT04892056 - Evaluation of the Rate of Anterior Segment Retraction Using Two Types of Mechanics N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04902456 - Evaluation of the Anchorage Loss During En-masse Retraction in Orthodontic Patients With Maxillary Protrusion N/A
Completed NCT05183451 - Effect Of Low Level Laser Therapy on the Rate of En- Masse Retraction: RCT N/A
Completed NCT04921579 - Evaluation of Treatment Duration of En-masse Versus Two Steps Retraction in Patients Having Maxillary Protrusion N/A
Recruiting NCT03903575 - 3D Comparison of Anterior Teeth Retraction and Anchorage Control Between En-masse and Two-step Mechanics N/A
Completed NCT04887974 - Canine Retraction With Temporary Anchorage Devices N/A
Recruiting NCT04905004 - Efficiency of Canine Retraction Using Different Reactivation Intervals N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03074370 - Evaluation of Smile Esthetics in Orthodontically Treated Patients With Bimaxillary-dentoalveolar Protrusion N/A