Bimaxillary Protrusion Clinical Trial
Official title:
Evaluation of the Rate of Anterior Segment Retraction Using Friction Versus Frictionless Mechanics: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Verified date | May 2021 |
Source | Future University in Egypt |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The rate of anterior segment retraction in bi-maxillary protrusion cases was evaluated comparing the friction and friction-less mechanics. since, there has been a lack of clear cut guidelines for clinicians for the optimum method for retraction, this randomized clinical trial was done.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 30 |
Est. completion date | December 15, 2020 |
Est. primary completion date | June 10, 2020 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | Female |
Age group | 13 Years to 25 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Female Subjects. - Age 13-25 y of age. - Skeletal Angle Class I malocclusion with Bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion in need of four 1st premolar extractions with maximum anchorage. - Fully erupted permanent dentition without crowding. - Good oral and general health. Exclusion Criteria: - Systemic Diseases or syndromes or on anti-inflammatory medication. - Extracted or missing permanent teeth. - History of previous Orthodontic Treatment. - Parafunctional Habits. - Badly decayed teeth. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Egypt | Future Univeristy in Egypt | Cairo |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Future University in Egypt |
Egypt,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Rate of Anterior Segment Retraction | The rate of anterior segment retraction per month was measured on monthly digital models. | The start of anterior segment retraction up to complete space closure, an average of 6 months. | |
Secondary | Anchorage Loss | Mesial movement of the first primary molar was evaluated on the digital models | The start of anterior segment retraction up to complete space closure, an average of 6 months. | |
Secondary | Pain experienced after each activation of the two mechanics | Patients were asked to complete Visual Analogue Scales of the degree of pain after every intervention. The scale values between 0 to 10, with 0 being no pain experienced by the patient and 10 being the highest level of pain experienced. | The start of anterior segment retraction up to complete space closure, an average of 6 months. |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04383600 -
Flapless Mops for Acceleration of Canine Retraction
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05150665 -
Evaluation of Mini and Macro-esthetics Following En- Masse Retraction Versus Two Step Retraction
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04868721 -
Evaluation of Two Approaches of Micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) During Orthodontic Canine Retraction
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04631419 -
Effects of Flapless Laser Corticotomy in Canine Retraction
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04878939 -
Evaluation of Incisors' Position Following Anterior Segment Retraction
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04902456 -
Evaluation of the Anchorage Loss During En-masse Retraction in Orthodontic Patients With Maxillary Protrusion
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04902430 -
Evaluation of the Rate of En-masse Retraction in Orthodontic Patients With Maxillary Protrusion
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05183451 -
Effect Of Low Level Laser Therapy on the Rate of En- Masse Retraction: RCT
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04921579 -
Evaluation of Treatment Duration of En-masse Versus Two Steps Retraction in Patients Having Maxillary Protrusion
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03903575 -
3D Comparison of Anterior Teeth Retraction and Anchorage Control Between En-masse and Two-step Mechanics
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04887974 -
Canine Retraction With Temporary Anchorage Devices
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04905004 -
Efficiency of Canine Retraction Using Different Reactivation Intervals
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03074370 -
Evaluation of Smile Esthetics in Orthodontically Treated Patients With Bimaxillary-dentoalveolar Protrusion
|
N/A |