Single Port Access (SPA) Cholecystectomy Versus Standard Laparoscopic

Status Recruiting

Clinical Trial Summary

Background:

Single port access surgery is a rapidly progressing surgical approach which allows performance of standard laparoscopic surgery through a single transparietal port instead of multiple port accesses.

Objective:

Demonstrate the validity of Single port access (SPA) cholecystectomy compared to multiple ports laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Hypothesis:

SPA cholecystectomy is associated with decreased parietal and body image trauma compare to multiple ports laparoscopic cholecystectomy. SPA cholecystectomy should be associated with better cosmetic results, may improve postoperative recovery due to lower parietal pain. SPA cholecystectomy may also be associated with decreased rate of parietal complications as lower numbers of transparietal port are placed.

Methods:

All patients offered cholecystectomy, either SPA or multiport cholecystectomy, included in the study will have recognized biliary pathology for which formal indication cholecystectomy are recognized internationally.

Surgical technique, either for SPA cholecystectomy or for multiple ports cholecystectomy, will be the same except, that one surgical technique is achieved through a single transparietal port and the other through multiple ports.

Randomization will be performed before surgeries after patients have given their informed consent to the study.

No specific test or cost will be necessitated by the study. Patients will be informed orally and will receive a short study summary, allowing them to give an informed consent.

Endpoints:

- Morbidity

- Body image and Cosmetic results

- Post-operative pain (opioid sparing effect)

- Operative time

- Hospital stay

Clinical Trial Description

n/a

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT00904865
Study type	Interventional
Source	University Hospital, Geneva
Contact	Pascal Bucher, MD
Phone	+41223723311
Email	pascal.bucher@hcuge.ch
Status	Recruiting
Phase	Phase 2/Phase 3
Start date	February 2009

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Not yet recruiting	`NCT03636841` - Reduction of Operating Time by a Smoke Electroprecipitation Device for Acute Cholecystitis	N/A
Completed	`NCT02379780` - Ultrasound Guided Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Versus Paravertebral Block in the Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy	N/A
Completed	`NCT02264444` - Establishing Visualization Grading Scale on LESS Cholecystectomy	N/A
Completed	`NCT01937104` - ONSD According to the Position During Laparoscopy	N/A
Completed	`NCT02461147` - Prospective Validation of "Cholecystectomy First" Strategy for Gallstone Migration
Completed	`NCT01476995` - Prognostic Indicators as Provided by the EPIC ClearView	N/A
Completed	`NCT00940264` - Laparoscopic Transvaginal Hybrid Cholecystectomy: a Prospective Data Collection.	N/A
Completed	`NCT00746850` - Harmonic in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis	N/A
Completed	`NCT00370344` - Small-incision Open Cholecystectomy or Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Gallbladder Disease	Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed	`NCT00195351` - Study Comparing Tigecycline Versus Ceftriaxone Sodium Plus Metronidazole in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT02858986` - 3D Versus 4K Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy	N/A
Completed	`NCT04602156` - US-guided Trocar Versus Seldiger Technique for Percutaneous Cholecystostomy	N/A
Completed	`NCT04942665` - Low Dose ICG for Biliary Tract and Tumor Imaging	Phase 2
Completed	`NCT02547064` - Effect of Modified Stylet Angulation on the Intubation With GlideScope®	N/A
Completed	`NCT00230971` - Study Comparing Tigecycline Versus Ceftriaxone Sodium Plus Metronidazole in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection (cIAI)	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT04122261` - A Clinical Study of Chinese Domestic Surgical Robot	N/A
Completed	`NCT04716166` - Incentive Spirometry and Upper Abdominal Laparoscopic Surgery	N/A
Completed	`NCT01476319` - Improving Informed Consent Process for Percutaneous Cholecystostomy in the Emergency Department	N/A
Withdrawn	`NCT02225418` - Transmuscular Quadratus Lumborum Block for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy	N/A
Suspended	`NCT04306939` - Genomic Resources for Enhancing Available Therapies (GREAT1.0) Study

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

Single Port Access (SPA) Cholecystectomy Versus Standard Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms