View clinical trials related to Biliary Cannulation.
Filter by:Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is one of the most technically challenging procedures in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Selective deep cannulation is a critical step for the performance of ERCP. The incidence of difficult cannulation has been reported in many studies, ranging from 10% to 40% in patients with native papilla. Difficult cannulation is an independent risk factor for post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). The definition of difficult cannulation has been proposed by European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guidelines. Initial cannulation is considered difficult with the presence of one or more of the following: more than 5 min for attempting to cannulate; more than 5 contacts with the papilla; more than 1 unintended pancreatic duct cannulation or opacification. The clear definition of difficult cannulation is important for making decisions during or after ERCP, including determining the appropriate time to transfer to advanced cannulation techniques (e.g. early precut) and whether prophylactic methods should be administrated to reduce the risk of PEP. Although 5-5-1 criteria have been widely used during ERCP practice or in relevant studies, it remains unclear whether the current criteria are suitable for the cannulation procedure with trainee involvement. Because of inexperienced manipulation of the scope and accessories, the involvement of trainees generally increases the overall cannulation time and attempts, which are the two important parameters in the criteria of difficult cannulation. Thus, the investigators hypothesized that the definition of difficult cannulation in trainee-involved cannulation might be different from the traditional 5-5-1 criteria.
Selective cannulation is considered the most challenging step for most of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Wire-guided cannulation is the standard technique for initial cannulation. When meeting difficulty, double wire technique (DWT) is widely used. With one guidewire occupying pancreatic duct(PD) , the following cannulation of CBD with a sphincterome preloaded with another guidewire often becomes feasible. When performing DWT, a sphincterotome should enter the common duct of papilla through a small orifice and be placed in the left and upper direction of PD guidewire. Then another guidewire can be advanced into bile duct. As an advanced cannulation technique, DWT can be successfully performed in up to 80% of difficult patients. However, it can be technically difficult, especially for trainees or endoscopists without adequate experience. Here we planned to prospectively record the procedures of double-wire cannulation by two trainees without prior experience of DWT. This study aims to delinate the learning curve of DWT and its safety by trainees.
This is a prospective randomized comparative multicentric study. Briefly, we will analyze the technical success, performance and clinical outcomes of early versus delayed double-guidewire technique (DGT) in difficult biliary cannulation.
Selective cannulation is considered the most challenging step for most of Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Wire-guided cannulation is the standard technique for initial cannulation. When meeting difficulty, double wire technique (DWT) is widely used. With one guidewire occupying pancreatic duct (PD), the following cannulation of common bile duct (CBD) with a sphincterotome preloaded with another guidewire often becomes feasible. However, because of the small opening of the papilla, sometimes it is technically challenging for the following cannulation of CBD with the sphincterotome and PD guidewire in the same working channel. We hypothesized that a tiny cut of the opening of papilla, without the injury of pancreatic sphincter, may facilitate the success of DWT and shorten the overall cannulation time.