View clinical trials related to Bile Duct Stricture.
Filter by:To assess safety and effectiveness in the long term of percutaneous insertion of Biodegradable (BD) Biliary Stents for the treatment of benign biliary strictures, in a single center experience.
The purpose of this open-label study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of HDT1801 (BUDCA) over 12 weeks in adult subjects with PBC who have an inadequate response to standard therapy. Inadequate response is defined as persistently elevated serum alkaline phosphatase at greater than or equal to1.5 times the upper limits of normal for the testing lab in spite of having been on adequate doses of standard therapy with UDCA (ursodeoxycholic acid) at 13-15 mg/kg for at least 6 months.
The study aimed to assess role of DIA in diagnosing nature of indeterminate bile ducts stricture
Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has improved the diagnostic performance of cytology for evaluation of malignant biliary strictures in the US and Europe. The utility of FISH for diagnosis of biliary strictures in Asia is currently unknown. The investigators conducted a prospective study in 2 university hospitals to determine diagnostic performance of FISH for the diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures in Thai patients.
This study was aimed to to evaluate the efficacy of the new multibending ultra-slim endoscope compared with a conventional ultra-slim endoscope for free-hand insertion of an endoscope into the bile duct for direct POC.
The purpose of this prospective study is to compare the diagnostic utility of two techniques (brush cytology + FISH and brush cytology + free DNA analysis) in the diagnosis of biliary strictures. Histologic diagnosis (biopsies) in conjunction with clinical and/or imaging follow-up will serve as the gold standard for diagnosis of malignancy. In order to do this the investigators will ask study participants to have a small volume of fluid obtained from the bile duct sent for additional testing at RedPATH. In some patients additional brushings will be obtained for FISH testing (this adds <2 minutes to ERCP and only associated risk is increased procedure duration). The investigators hypothesize that the use of cytology +DNA analysis has a higher sensitivity and accuracy when compared to cytology +FISH in patients with biliary strictures. Primary aim: To compare the sensitivity and accuracy of the two techniques (brush cytology + FISH and brush cytology + free DNA analysis). Histologic diagnosis (histology from biopsy or cytology for fine needle aspiration) in conjunction with clinical and/or imaging follow-up will serve as the gold standard for diagnosis of malignancy. Secondary aims: 1. To evaluate the diagnostic yield of malignancy when all three techniques (cytology, FISH and DNA analysis) are used. 2. To evaluate the added value of biliary forceps biopsies, when used in conjunction with cytology, FISH and DNA analysis.
This study will test two different methods for processing biopsy specimens taken from the bile duct. Patient;s who are asked to participate int his study have a stricture in the bile duct that needs a single operator cholangioscopy-guided biopsies during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) so that a diagnosis can be made. Standard of care includes performing single operator cholangioscopy-guided biopsies in the bile duct and sending the tissue to the lab for testing to make a diagnosis. Using this method the investigators can establish a diagnosis only about 50% of the time. The investigators believe that if a cytopathologist is available in the endoscopy suite during the procedure to evaluate the biopsy specimens onsite, the investigators can improve the diagnostic accuracy. The purpose of this study is to compare two methods for processing biopsies obtained from the bile duct (Onsite vs. Offsite).
The investigators are evaluating the use of a SpyBite biopsy forceps for tissue diagnosis when compared to standard biopsy techniques.