Treatment Outcomes in Bile Duct Stones

Bile Duct Diseases Clinical Trial

Official title:

Registry to Evaluate the Outcomes Following Algorithmic Approach in the Endoscopic Treatment of Bile Duct Stones

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT04145843
• Other study ID #: 1504680
• Status: Completed
• Start date: November 6, 2019
• Est. completion date: April 5, 2022

Study information

• Verified date: July 2023
• Source: AdventHealth
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

This registry is to evaluate the procedural and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones when utilizing an algorithmic management approach.

Description:

Gallstone diseases are common, affecting 20 million patients in the United States with associated costs of over US $6 billion. Common bile duct (CBD) stones in turn occur in 15-20% patients with gallstone disease and require treatment due to risk of infection and pancreatitis. Endoscopic treatment via endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the treatment modality of choice in CBD stones. The most simple treatment techniques include biliary sphincterotomy and stone extraction via the use of standard devices such as a stone retrieval balloons or stone retrieval baskets. However, patients with difficult bile duct stones require advanced maneuvers namely mechanical lithotripsy, large balloon sphincteroplasty (LBS) of the major duodenal papilla and single operator cholangioscopy-guided lithotripsy (SOC-LL).

Currently, there are no standardized treatment approaches in the management of CBD stones, especially in the management of difficult CBD stones. Therefore, ERCP in patients with difficult CBD stones can be inefficient and prolonged with use of multiple devices and techniques. In an effort to standardize the management of bile duct stones, we have devised an algorithm for the treatment of bile duct stones using current standard of care methods, taking into account the size of bile duct stones, size of bile duct and availability of endoscopic expertise. The objective of this registry is to evaluate the procedural and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones when utilizing an algorithmic management approach.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 42
• Est. completion date: April 5, 2022
• Est. primary completion date: April 5, 2022
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

1. All patients with confirmed or suspected bile duct stones undergoing endoscopic therapy for treatment of bile duct stones

2. Patients 18 years or over

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Patients not undergoing endoscopic therapy for bile duct stones

2. Patients < 18 years of age

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Bile Duct Diseases
• Bile Duct Obstruction
• Cholestasis
• Gallstone
• Gallstones

Intervention

Procedure:
• endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
ERCP is a procedure that enables the physician to examine the pancreatic and bile ducts and remove gallstones.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	Center for Interventional Endoscopy	Orlando	Florida

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
AdventHealth

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (10)

Aburajab M, Dua K. Endoscopic Management of Difficult Bile Duct Stones. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2018 Mar 23;20(2):8. doi: 10.1007/s11894-018-0613-1. — View Citation

ASGE Standards of Practice Committee; Buxbaum JL, Abbas Fehmi SM, Sultan S, Fishman DS, Qumseya BJ, Cortessis VK, Schilperoort H, Kysh L, Matsuoka L, Yachimski P, Agrawal D, Gurudu SR, Jamil LH, Jue TL, Khashab MA, Law JK, Lee JK, Naveed M, Sawhney MS, Thosani N, Yang J, Wani SB. ASGE guideline on the role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Jun;89(6):1075-1105.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.10.001. Epub 2019 Apr 9. — View Citation

Brewer Gutierrez OI, Bekkali NLH, Raijman I, Sturgess R, Sejpal DV, Aridi HD, Sherman S, Shah RJ, Kwon RS, Buxbaum JL, Zulli C, Wassef W, Adler DG, Kushnir V, Wang AY, Krishnan K, Kaul V, Tzimas D, DiMaio CJ, Ho S, Petersen B, Moon JH, Elmunzer BJ, Webster GJM, Chen YI, Dwyer LK, Inamdar S, Patrick VB, Attwell A, Hosmer A, Ko C, Maurano A, Sarkar A, Taylor LJ, Gregory MH, Strand DS, Raza A, Kothari S, Harris JP, Kumta NA, Manvar A, Topazian MD, Lee YN, Spiceland CM, Trindade AJ, Bukhari MA, Sanaei O, Ngamruengphong S, Khashab MA. Efficacy and Safety of Digital Single-Operator Cholangioscopy for Difficult Biliary Stones. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Jun;16(6):918-926.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.10.017. Epub 2017 Oct 24. — View Citation

Buxbaum J, Sahakian A, Ko C, Jayaram P, Lane C, Yu CY, Kankotia R, Laine L. Randomized trial of cholangioscopy-guided laser lithotripsy versus conventional therapy for large bile duct stones (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Apr;87(4):1050-1060. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.08.021. Epub 2017 Sep 1. — View Citation

Cote GA, Singh S, Bucksot LG, Lazzell-Pannell L, Schmidt SE, Fogel E, McHenry L, Watkins J, Lehman G, Sherman S. Association between volume of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography at an academic medical center and use of pancreatobiliary therapy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Aug;10(8):920-4. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.02.019. Epub 2012 Mar 2. — View Citation

Franzini T, Moura RN, Bonifacio P, Luz GO, de Souza TF, Dos Santos MEL, Rodela GL, Ide E, Herman P, Montagnini AL, D'Albuquerque LAC, Sakai P, de Moura EGH. Complex biliary stones management: cholangioscopy versus papillary large balloon dilation - a randomized controlled trial. Endosc Int Open. 2018 Feb;6(2):E131-E138. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-122493. Epub 2018 Feb 1. — View Citation

Karsenti D, Coron E, Vanbiervliet G, Privat J, Kull E, Bichard P, Perrot B, Quentin V, Duriez A, Cholet F, Subtil C, Duchmann JC, Lefort C, Hudziak H, Koch S, Granval P, Lecleire S, Charachon A, Barange K, Cesbron EM, De Widerspach A, Le Baleur Y, Barthet M, Poincloux L. Complete endoscopic sphincterotomy with vs. without large-balloon dilation for the removal of large bile duct stones: randomized multicenter study. Endoscopy. 2017 Oct;49(10):968-976. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-114411. Epub 2017 Jul 28. — View Citation

Ozawa N, Yasuda I, Doi S, Iwashita T, Shimizu M, Mukai T, Nakashima M, Ban T, Kojima I, Matsuda K, Matsuda M, Ishida Y, Okabe Y, Ando N, Iwata K. Prospective randomized study of endoscopic biliary stone extraction using either a basket or a balloon catheter: the BasketBall study. J Gastroenterol. 2017 May;52(5):623-630. doi: 10.1007/s00535-016-1257-2. Epub 2016 Sep 8. — View Citation

Rosenkranz L, Patel SN. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for stone burden in the bile and pancreatic ducts. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2012 Jul;22(3):435-50. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2012.05.007. Epub 2012 Jun 12. — View Citation

Varadarajulu S, Kilgore ML, Wilcox CM, Eloubeidi MA. Relationship among hospital ERCP volume, length of stay, and technical outcomes. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Sep;64(3):338-47. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.05.016. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Rate of ductal clearance at index endoscopic intervention.	Percent of patients that achieve ductal clearance at the index intervention	6 months
Secondary	Total number of needed interventions	Total number of endoscopic interventions required for ductal clearance	6 months
Secondary	Procedure duration	Length of procedure in minutes	Index procedure
Secondary	Technical success	Success of the procedures as documented by a yes or no.	Index procedure
Secondary	Adverse Events	Total number of adverse events that occurred	6 months
Secondary	Crossover to other therapeutic intervention	Need for interventional radiology or surgical intervention for bile duct stone removal as documented by yes or no.	6 months
Secondary	Procedural costs	Total costs measured in US dollars for the procedure	6 months