Treatment of BPH With CO2 Serenoa +PEA as Monotherapy or in Combination With Tamsulosin: ProSeRePEA Trial

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Clinical Trial

— ProSeRePEA  

Official title:

Valutazione Dell'Efficacia Del Trattamento Dell'Ipertrofia Prostatica Benigna Con Serenoa Repens Estratta Con CO2 + PEA (Palmitoilethanolamide) in Monoterapia o in Combinazione Alla Tamsulosina: ProSeRePEA Trial

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT06181175
• Other study ID #: ProSeRePEA trial, v.01
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: October 1, 2021
• Est. completion date: April 30, 2025

Study information

• Verified date: December 2023
• Source: Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Maggiore della Carita
• Contact: Michele Billia, MD
• Phone: +3903213733201
• Email: clinicaurologicanovara1[@]gmail.com
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the supplement PEAPROSTIL 600 (FARMITALIA®) composed of Serenoa Repens combined with PEA in single or combined therapy with alpha-blocker in the reduction of voiding symptoms in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients at low risk of progression to obstructing conditioning that need for surgical therapy. Any adverse events, intolerance, allergic reactions, complications related to the products used will be recorded throughout the study period.

Description:

Study design Single-center 3-arm randomized prospective clinical trial. - Arm 1: PEAPROSTIL 600 + Tamsulosin 0.4 mg - Arm 2: PEAPROSTIL 600 - Arm 3: Tamsulosin 0.4 mg At the time of study enrollment, each patient will be randomized into one of the 3 arms described. Randomisation will take place with a 1: 1: 1 scheme. All the variables will be collected by a medical co-investigator of Prof. Alessandro Volpe's team during the follow-up visits at pre-established intervals of 1, 3, 6 and 12 months (respectively T1, T2, T3 and T4) and will be reported in the special data collection folder (CRF). At 1 month (T1) 3 months (T2), 6 months (T3) and 12 months (T4): Personal data: identification number and initials of the patient's name and surname, date of birth, telephone number and e-mail address History: International Prostate Symptoms Score questionnaire, Short Form Health Survey-36 questionnaires Physical examination: abdominal, urological including rectal examination Uroflowmetry: analysis of the morphology of the flow curve, Qmax, volume of urine emptied, post-voiding residue). 250 patients will be recruited. The sample analysis was performed by the Department of Medical, Surgical and Advanced Technologies "Ingrassia" of the University of Catania for a study power of 90% and an Alpha error of 0.05 (statistical significance). In particular, the design involves a 3-arm randomization process 1: 1: 1. Expecting a difference of at least 2 points in the International Prostate Symptoms Score questionnaire and Qmax and a standard deviation of 4. It is necessary to enroll 250 patients to obtain a statistic of 90% at a significance level of 0.05. The statistical analysis of the data collected during the study, according to an intention-to-treat procedure, will be performed using statistical software including IBM SPSS statistics version 23.0. A descriptive analysis of the patients included in the three arms will be performed using the appropriate frequency measurements and central tendency and dispersion indices. Considering a pair of the three arms at a time (1 vs. 2; 1 vs. 3; 2 vs. 3), the qualitative variables will be compared using the chi-squared test; quantitative variables will be compared by Student's t-test. The significance level will be set at p <0.05. For the variables that will be significant in the univariate analysis, multivariate analyzes will be carried out using appropriate regression models.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Enrollment: 250
• Est. completion date: April 30, 2025
• Est. primary completion date: October 30, 2024
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: Male
• Age group: 40 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• male with age> 40 years
• baseline International Prostate Symptoms Score between 8 and 14
• prostate volume = 60 cc assessed by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)
• maximum flow (Qmax at uroflowmetry) = 15 ml / sec
• post voiding residue on extemporaneous ultrasound = 120 ml
• Signature of informed consent for participation in the study
• ability to understand the conditions of the study and to participate in the study throughout its duration.

Exclusion Criteria:

• urinary incontinence
• overactive bladder
• neurological bladder
• malignancies in progress and which have undergone treatment in the previous 6 months
• local or systemic infections (urinary tract infection, osteomyelitis, sepsis, etc.)
• kidney failure
• macrohematuria
• bladder stones

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
• Hyperplasia
• Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
• Prostatic Hyperplasia
• Urinary Obstruction

Intervention

Drug:
• PEAPROSTIL 600 + Tamsulosin 0.4 mg
PEAPROSTIL 600 mg one sachet oral daily+ Tamsulosin 0.4 mg one tablet oral daily
• Tamsulosin 0.4 mg
Tamsulosin 0.4 mg one tablet oral daily
• PEAPROSTIL 600 mg
PEAPROSTIL 600 mg one sachet oral daily

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Italy	Michele Billia	Novara

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Maggiore della Carita

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Italy, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Efficacy of treatment of combination therapy group vs tamsulosin group in International Prostate Symptoms Score questionnaire	comparing patients receiving tamsulosin + peaprostil combination therapy (Arm 1) versus patients receiving tamsulosin monotherapy (Arm 3) in terms of International Prostate Symptoms Score (scale 0-35) at 1,3,6 and 12 months.; (0 point no symptoms, 35 points many symptoms)	1 year
Primary	Efficacy of treatment of combination therapy group vs tamsulosin group in Quality of Life questionnaire	comparing patients receiving tamsulosin + peaprostil combination therapy (Arm 1) versus patients receiving tamsulosin monotherapy (Arm 3) in terms of Quality of life (0-6 points) at 1,3,6 and 12 months (0 point good quality of life, 6 points bad quality of life)	1 year
Secondary	Efficacy of treatment in combination therapy group vs tamsulosin group in evaluation of Short Form Health Survey-36 questionnaires	comparing patients receiving tamsulosin + peaprostil combination therapy (Arm 1) versus patients receiving tamsulosin monotherapy (Arm 3) in terms of Short Form Health Survey-36 (36 questions) at 1,3,6 and 12 months	1 year
Secondary	Efficacy of treatment in combination therapy group vs tamsulosin group in evaluation of uroflowmetry with maximum urinary flow (ml/s)	comparing patients receiving tamsulosin + peaprostil combination therapy (Arm 1) versus patients receiving tamsulosin monotherapy (Arm 3) in terms of maximum urinary flow (ml/s) at 1,3,6 and 12 months	1 year
Secondary	Efficacy of treatment in combination therapy group vs tamsulosin group in evaluation of post voided volume (ml)	comparing patients receiving tamsulosin + peaprostil combination therapy (Arm 1) versus patients receiving tamsulosin monotherapy (Arm 3) in terms of post voided volume (ml) at 1,3,6 and 12 months	1 year
Secondary	Efficacy of treatment in combination therapy group vs tamsulosin group in evaluation of prostate volume (gr)	comparing patients receiving tamsulosin + peaprostil combination therapy (Arm 1) versus patients receiving tamsulosin monotherapy (Arm 3) in terms of prostate volume (gr) at 6 and 12 months	1 year
Secondary	Efficacy of treatment in combination therapy group vs peaprostil group and peaprostil group vs tamsulosin group in terms of International Prostate Symptoms Score	comparing patients receiving combination therapy group (Arm1) vs peaprostil group (Arm2) and peaprostil group (Arm2) vs tamsulosin alone (Arm 3) in terms of International Prostate Symptoms Score (scale 0-35) at 1,3,6 and 12 months.; (0 point no symptoms, 35 points many symptoms)	1 year
Secondary	Efficacy of treatment in combination therapy group vs peaprostil group and peaprostil group vs tamsulosin group in terms of Quality of life	comparing patients receiving combination therapy group (Arm1) vs peaprostil group (Arm2) and peaprostil group (Arm2) vs tamsulosin alone (Arm 3) in terms of Quality of life (QoL) (0-6 points) at 1,3,6 and 12 months (0 point good quality of life, 6 points bad quality of life)	1 year
Secondary	Efficacy of treatment in combination therapy group vs peaprostil group and peaprostil group vs tamsulosin group in terms of Short Form Health Survey-36 questionnaires	comparing patients receiving combination therapy group (Arm1) vs peaprostil group (Arm2) and peaprostil group (Arm2) vs tamsulosin alone (Arm 3) in terms of Short Form Health Survey-36 (36 questions) at 1,3,6 and 12 months	1 year
Secondary	Efficacy of treatment in combination therapy group vs peaprostil group and peaprostil group vs tamsulosin group in terms of uroflowmetry with maximum urinary flow (ml/s)	comparing patients receiving combination therapy group (Arm1) vs peaprostil group (Arm2) and peaprostil group (Arm2) vs tamsulosin alone (Arm 3) in terms of maximum urinary flow (ml/s) at 1,3,6 and 12 months	1 year
Secondary	Efficacy of treatment in combination therapy group vs peaprostil group and peaprostil group vs tamsulosin group in terms of post voided volume (ml)	comparing patients receiving combination therapy group (Arm1) vs peaprostil group (Arm2) and peaprostil group (Arm2) vs tamsulosin alone (Arm 3) in terms of post voided volume (ml) at 1,3,6 and 12 months	1 year
Secondary	Efficacy of treatment in combination therapy group vs peaprostil group and peaprostil group vs tamsulosin group in terms of prostate volume (gr)	comparing patients receiving combination therapy group (Arm1) vs peaprostil group (Arm2) and peaprostil group (Arm2) vs tamsulosin alone (Arm 3) in terms of prostate volume (gr) at 6 and 12 months	1 year