The Use of REZUM System in Chinese Male Patients With LUTS Secondary to Benign Prostate Enlargement

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Clinical Trial

Official title:

The Use of REZUM System in Chinese Male Patients With Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Secondary to Benign Prostate Enlargement

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Terminated

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT04340934
• Other study ID #: CRE-2019.662
• Status: Terminated
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: May 13, 2020
• Est. completion date: January 29, 2021

Study information

• Verified date: June 2021
• Source: Chinese University of Hong Kong
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Men with enlarged prostates commonly experience lower urinary tract symptoms and may go on to develop complications such as acute urinary retention (AUR). Surgery is the standard treatment option required to remove the enlarged prostates and to rectify such complications. Transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) was first performed over 80 years ago and is still regarded as the "gold standard" for the treatment of benign prostatic enlargement (BPE) in prostates between 30 and 80ml. While TURP results in an improvement in symptoms, perioperative morbidity and long-term complications can include postoperative bleeding, urinary retention, incontinence, urethral strictures, erectile dysfunction, and ejaculatory dysfunction. Rezūm is a system uses water steam energy to remove the particular part of the prostate that enlarges and causes symptoms due to BPH. Rezum involves a radiofrequency (RF) generator system and an endoscopic device that is introduced into the body via the urethra. Radiofrequency energy from the generator will heat up a controlled amount of water inside the system and converting the water into vapour or steam. The thermal energy created outside the body is delivered into the prostate tissue through the tiny needle at the tip of the endoscopic device. Small amount of steam will then be injected into the tissue and energy will be released during the conversion of steam to water. The energy will heat up the prostate tissue and result in gradually removal of the targeted obstructive prostate tissue. The treatment procedure takes approximately 3-7 minutes and can be performed as day surgery. No radiofrequency energy is delivered into the body, other than the prostate. Throughout the procedure normal saline (salty water) is running into the urethra through the scope to help ensure better views and to prevent the urethra from overheating. Voiding symptom will gradually improve after the procedure. From clinical study based in Caucasian population, patients had improved urinary flow rate by on average 50% and also improvement in quality of life scores. The treatment results could last for at least 4 years. However, information regarding the use of Rezum in Chinese and Asian is lacking. This study is proposed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Rezum in our population.

Description:

Benign prostatic enlargement (BPE) is a non-malignant growth of the prostate gland that can lead to a range of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), and in some cases eventually leading to retention of urine. In patients failing to wean off catheter after retention of urine due to BPE, surgical intervention is the standard treatment. Surgical intervention options have evolved from electrosurgical resection to the use of lasers for enucleation and ablation [1]. Transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) was first performed over 80 years ago and is still regarded as the "gold standard" for the treatment of BPE in prostates between 30 and 80ml [2]. While TURP results in a statistically significant improvement in symptoms score and and maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), perioperative morbidity and long-term complications can include postoperative bleeding, urinary retention, incontinence, urethral strictures, erectile dysfunction, and ejaculatory dysfunction [3]. Rezum system use the principle of thermodynamic principle of convective energy transfer, which is different to other conductive heat transfer techniques like transurethral microwave therapy or transurethral needle ablation. [4] In the Rezum system, radiofrequency power is used to create thermal energy in the form of water vapor, which in turn deposits the stored thermal energy during the change from steam phase to liquid after injected into the prostatic tissue. The Rezum system contained a generator with a radiofrequency power supply to create water vapor from sterile water and a single-use transurethral delivery device. The tip of the delivery device contains an 18-gauge needle where 12 small emitter holes spaced circumferentially for dispersion of water vapor into the targeted prostatic tissue. The injection is at a pressure slightly higher than interstitial pressure. Due to the convective properties of water vapor, the injected steam will disperse rapidly and homogenously through the tissue and releases stored thermal energy into prostatic tissue. The released thermal energy will cause tissue necrosis. The most important character of the treatment is when the transition zone is treated, its energy will only deposit within the zonal anatomy of the prostate. Studies by histologic and MRI imaging had shown that after treatment, the thermal lesions were only limited to the transition zone without extension to the peripheral zone, bladder, rectum or striated urinary sphincter [5,6]. It was shown that 6 mo after treatment the total prostate volume was reduced by 28.9% and the resolution of thermal lesions as determined with Gadolini- um-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging was almost complete. [6] A small pilot study had shown that Rezum could provide safe and effective treatment upto one year for men with LUTS due to BPE. [7] In the first multicentre, randomised, controlled study 197 men were enrolled and randomised in a 2:1 ratio to treatment with the Rezum system or control. [8] The sham procedure (control) was rigid cystoscopy with imitated treatment sounds. The primary efficacy end point was met at 3 months with relief of symptoms measured by a change in International prostate symptom score (IPSS) of 50% for the treatment arm compared to 20% for the control group (p < 0.0001). In the thermal treatment arm, the maximal uroflow rate increased significantly by 67% from 9.9 ml/s to 16.1 ml/s (p < 0.0001) after 3 months. The clinical beneficial outcome was sustained throughout the study period with an improvement of 54% at the 12-mo follow up. In the latest updated report on the 4-year outcome, the improvement in voiding (as measured by IPSS and uroflowmetry) was sustained to 4 years with surgical retreatment rate of only 4.4%. [9] Therefore, Rezum was proven to be an effective treatment for BPH. However, all studies focused on the application of Rezum in patients with LUTS are from Caucasian population. Therefore, in this study, investigator plan to evaluate the feasibility and safety of Rezum in the management of Chinese male patients with LUTS secondary to BPE. This could provide information on the tolerability and effectiveness of the treatment in local population.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Terminated
• Enrollment: 3
• Est. completion date: January 29, 2021
• Est. primary completion date: January 29, 2021
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Male
• Age group: 50 Years to 80 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Men aged between 50 - 80 years
• clinically indicated for surgical treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patients with active urinary tract infection or in retention of urine
• Patients with bleeding disorder or on anti-coagulation
• Patients with bladder pathology including bladder stone and bladder cancer
• Patients with urethral stricture
• Patients with neurogenic bladder and/or sphincter abnormalities
• Patients with previous nonpharmacological prostate treatment, Prostate cancer
• Fail to give informed consent

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
• Hyperplasia
• Prostatic Hyperplasia

Intervention

Device:
• REZUM system
Rezu¯m is a system uses water steam energy to remove the particular part of the prostate that enlarges and causes symptoms due to BPH. Rezum involves a radiofrequency (RF) generator system and an endoscopic device that is introduced into the body via the urethra.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Hong Kong	Prince of Wales Hospital	Shatin

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Chinese University of Hong Kong

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Hong Kong, 

References & Publications (10)

Cantrill CH, Zorn KC, Elterman DS, Gonzalez RR. The Rezum system - a minimally invasive water vapor thermal therapy for obstructive benign prostatic hyperplasia. Can J Urol. 2019 Jun;26(3):9787-9793. — View Citation

Dixon C, Cedano ER, Pacik D, Vit V, Varga G, Wagrell L, Tornblom M, Mynderse L, Larson T. Efficacy and Safety of Rezum System Water Vapor Treatment for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Urology. 2015 Nov;86(5):1042-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.05.046. Epub 2015 Jul 26. — View Citation

Dixon CM, Rijo Cedano E, Mynderse LA, Larson TR. Transurethral convective water vapor as a treatment for lower urinary tract symptomatology due to benign prostatic hyperplasia using the Rezum(®) system: evaluation of acute ablative capabilities in the human prostate. Res Rep Urol. 2015 Jan 30;7:13-8. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S74040. eCollection 2015. — View Citation

Gratzke C, Bachmann A, Descazeaud A, Drake MJ, Madersbacher S, Mamoulakis C, Oelke M, Tikkinen KAO, Gravas S. EAU Guidelines on the Assessment of Non-neurogenic Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms including Benign Prostatic Obstruction. Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):1099-1109. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.038. Epub 2015 Jan 19. Review. — View Citation

Magistro G, Chapple CR, Elhilali M, Gilling P, McVary KT, Roehrborn CG, Stief CG, Woo HH, Gratzke C. Emerging Minimally Invasive Treatment Options for Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms. Eur Urol. 2017 Dec;72(6):986-997. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.07.005. Epub 2017 Jul 19. Review. — View Citation

McVary KT, Gange SN, Gittelman MC, Goldberg KA, Patel K, Shore ND, Levin RM, Rousseau M, Beahrs JR, Kaminetsky J, Cowan BE, Cantrill CH, Mynderse LA, Ulchaker JC, Larson TR, Dixon CM, Roehrborn CG. Minimally Invasive Prostate Convective Water Vapor Energy Ablation: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Study for the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. J Urol. 2016 May;195(5):1529-1538. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.10.181. Epub 2015 Nov 22. — View Citation

McVary KT, Rogers T, Roehrborn CG. Rezum Water Vapor Thermal Therapy for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Associated With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: 4-Year Results From Randomized Controlled Study. Urology. 2019 Apr;126:171-179. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.12.041. Epub 2019 Jan 21. — View Citation

Mynderse LA, Hanson D, Robb RA, Pacik D, Vit V, Varga G, Wagrell L, Tornblom M, Cedano ER, Woodrum DA, Dixon CM, Larson TR. Rezum System Water Vapor Treatment for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms/Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Validation of Convective Thermal Energy Transfer and Characterization With Magnetic Resonance Imaging and 3-Dimensional Renderings. Urology. 2015 Jul;86(1):122-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.03.021. Epub 2015 May 16. — View Citation

Rassweiler J, Teber D, Kuntz R, Hofmann R. Complications of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)--incidence, management, and prevention. Eur Urol. 2006 Nov;50(5):969-79; discussion 980. Epub 2006 Jan 30. — View Citation

Stepanova LA. Comparative evaluation of two methods of calculating zooplankton production exemplified on the Lake Il'men population. Sov J Ecol. 1974 Sep;4(6):476-82. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Changes in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 6 months after treatment	IPSS score ranging from 0-35 (the higher the worse)	at baseline, 6 months after study intervention
Secondary	Complications rate	Complications rate after study intervention	30 days after study intervention
Secondary	Post-op total score in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)	Change in total score of IPSS, score ranging from 0-35 (the higher the worse)	At 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after study intervention
Secondary	Post-op quality of life score	Change in quality of life assessed by change in International Prostate QOL score (ranges from 0 to 6, the higher the worse)	At 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after study intervention
Secondary	Post-op International Index of Erectile Function 5 (IIEF-5) score	Change in total score of International Index of Erectile Function 5 score (ranges from 0 to 25)	At 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after study intervention
Secondary	Post-op Overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS) score	Change in total score of Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (ranges from 0 - 15, the higher the worse)	At 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after study intervention
Secondary	Post-op pain score	Post-treatment pain score ranges from 0 to 10	Day 0, on the day of study intervention
Secondary	Change in voiding function in uroflowmetry	It is assessed by maximum flow rate in uroflowmetry	At baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after study intervention
Secondary	Change in urodynamic	Change in urodynamic function assessed by flowrate	At baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after study intervention
Secondary	Change in prostate size	Prostate size is assessed by transrectal ultrasound of prostate	At baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after study intervention