View clinical trials related to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.
Filter by:The high level of unsatisfactory outcome observed in patients treated for LUTS associated with BPH with respect to the different existing therapeutic options strongly emphasizes the need for treatment optimisation in daily practice by a careful LUTS monitoring and treatment adjustment when needed. The poorer outcome observed in patients for whom treatment has been initiated recently suggests that the duration of the disease itself may influence the patient satisfaction.To achieve this goal, we propose to systematically assess LUTS associated with BPH in patients treated for at least 6 months and to assess whether an alpha-blocker therapy initiation/modification may improve the outcome in case of persisting symptoms. We also investigate the influence of the symptom duration on the frequency of unsatisfactory outcome.
Single-arm prospective, interventional clinical trial. Results will be compared to a historical control in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia
The study is a multicentric randomized control trial with 4-year follow-up comparing perioperative and postoperative outcomes for transurethral plasmakinetic enucleation of prostate(TUKEP) and transurethral resection of prostate(TURP). The investigators recruit patient with benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH) as the object of study. TURP is set as control group . Meanwhile TUKEP is set as test group. Six affiliated hospitals will participate in this study. Through analyzing the perioperative and postoperative data between TUKEP group and TURP group, The investigators purpose demonstrating superiority of safety, efficacy and economic benefit in TUKEP group.
It was aimed to evaluate and investigate the effects of tamsulosin hydrochloride, has preferential selectivity for the α1A receptor in the prostat versus the α1B receptor in the blood vessels, and alfuzosin hydrochloride on choroidal thickness (CT), pupil diameter sizes evaluated by using enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (EDI-OCT) and scheimpflug/placido photography-based topoghraphy system in this study. 63 men patients with newly diagnosis of benign prostatic hyperplasia were randomly assigned to either alfuzosin hydrochloride or to tamsulosin hydrochloride groups in this prospective, randomized, parallel-group clinical trial. Enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, pupillography were obtained at baseline, 1st and 3rd month, and choroidal thicknesses and pupil diameter sizes were compared between the 2 groups.
A single-arm prospective, interventional clinical trial to evaluate the safety and performance of obtaining hemostasis following prostate resection using the AQUABEAM for treatment of LUTS resulting from BPH.
A single-arm prospective, interventional clinical trial to evaluate the safety and performance of obtaining hemostasis with commercially approved catheters following prostate resection using the AquaBeam for treatment of LUTS resulting from BPH.
This is a study protocol for the use of a novel radiopaque embolic agent in the treatment of lower urinary tract Symptoms (LUTS) with prostatic artery embolisation (PAE). This study will allow us to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this embolic in PAE along with giving us a better understanding of embolic distribution.
This study will describe the current medical care given to men who discuss their lower urinary tract symptoms with a HCP. It will document the primary reasons for the visit, the baseline characteristics of these men, the treatment received, and the practice patterns of specifically a primary care physician managing these patients.
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) refers to the proliferation of smooth muscle and epithelial cells of the prostate gland. The enlarged gland has the potential to result in lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to either bladder outlet obstruction or increased muscle tone and resistance, or both. For decades transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) has been the gold standard for treatment of symptomatic BPH that is refractory to nonoperative management. This is a surgical intervention aimed to reduce the size of the prostate gland. However, over the past fifteen years, many alternative therapies have been introduced including laser enucleation of the prostate (LEP). LEP has numerous advantages including decreased blood loss and length of hospital stay as well as increased effectiveness and safety for large prostate gland sizes (>80g).
For ageing men, Health related quality of life ( HRQoL) is challenged by two common issues: the onset of bothersome urinary symptoms attributable to prostate enlargement and diminishing ability to maintain normal sexual activity and function; both issues are important to men, yet often the treatment of the former has adverse effects on the latter. Current medical and surgical treatments offer symptomatic improvement of urinary symptoms. However long recovery times, degradation of sexual function and incontinence may negatively affect a patient's QoL. Prostatic urethral lift (PUL) and prostate artery embolization (PAE) represent two evolving techniques with contrasting mechanisms of action (mechanical decompression vs angiographic embolization). Both are minimally invasive, yield relief of urinary symptoms and have similar safety profiles. More importantly neither causes degradation of sexual function or urinary continence. Although multiple studies are being reported on PUL and PAE alike, currently there are no prospective clinical trials comparing these two technologies. We aim to prospectively evaluate and compare HRQol outcomes of PUL and PAE. Results of this study could have a great impact on patient outcomes in men opting for minimally invasive, sexual function sparing treatment options for symptom relief from prostate enlargement.