Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT04958525 |
Other study ID # |
M2020543 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Recruiting |
Phase |
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
February 1, 2021 |
Est. completion date |
July 1, 2023 |
Study information
Verified date |
June 2021 |
Source |
Peking University Third Hospital |
Contact |
Liu Bin |
Phone |
13671027688 |
Email |
liubin301[@]163.com |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Observational
|
Clinical Trial Summary
To compare the prognosis of patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage treated by
two different surgical methods, and to clarify the therapeutic effect of minimally invasive
surgery, so as to find a better surgical method that can reduce surgical trauma and mortality
and improve the prognosis of patients
Description:
In this study, a cohort observation method was adopted to observe a total of 52 patients who
underwent two surgical procedures, namely, removal of hematoma in basal ganglo-region by
keyhole neuroendoscopy under frontal ultrasound guidance and removal of hematoma by
craniotomy microsurgery. They were divided into the endoscopic surgery group and the
microsurgery group. In the endoscopic surgery group, 26 patients underwent removal of
hematoma in basal ganglo-region by keyhole neuroendoscopy under frontal ultrasound
guidance.In the microsurgery group, 26 cases were treated with craniotomy microsurgery for
hematoma removal. The clearance rate of surgical hematoma, surgical safety, GCS score, GOS
score, nerve fiber injury and postoperative complications were observed in the two groups 1
week, 1 month and 3 months after surgery.To observe and analyze whether endoscopic surgery
group has advantages in improving hematoma clearance rate and efficacy