Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT06218277 |
Other study ID # |
ONZ-2022-0379 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Recruiting |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
January 10, 2024 |
Est. completion date |
December 31, 2024 |
Study information
Verified date |
January 2024 |
Source |
University Hospital, Ghent |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
The investigators want to investigate the clinical impact of early antimicrobial
susceptibility results for gram negative bacilli isolated from blood cultures on
antimicrobial choices and early switches of antimicrobial therapy.
Description:
Sepsis and septic shock are defined as a (life-threatening) organ dysfunction caused by an
(uncontrolled) host response to an infection. Sepsis remains a leading cause of morbidity and
mortality worldwide. In addition, sepsis is also associated with prolonged hospitalization
and additional healthcare costs.
Sepsis and septic shock can be caused by a bloodstream infection. If bloodstream infection is
suspected, blood cultures are collected.
In recent years, various devices and methods have been developed to make an antibiogram
possible after a few hours, instead of the next day. The Q-linea AStar system will be used
for this purpose in the medical microbiology laboratory. In contrast to the classic method,
blood from the blood culture is not grafted onto a growth medium, but this blood is placed in
a specific cartridge on the device, after which automatic sample processing takes place,
which after six hours leads to a definitive susceptibility result for a large number of
gram-negative bacilli and causes of bloodstream infections. Moreover, the reported
antibiogram is not based on disk diffusion but on 'broth' microdilution (ISO 2776-1) where
the sensitivity to a specific antibiotic is determined on the basis of a dilution series.
This method allows sensitivity to be reported not only qualitatively (sensitive or
resistant), but also allows reporting of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC value).
This is the lowest concentration of an antibiotic at which the growth of the bacteria is
inhibited and this fact allows the dose administered to be optimized if necessary.
The aim of this study is therefore, if this new method can be implemented, to retrospectively
determine whether making the antibiogram more quickly available in the epidemiological
setting of Ghent University Hospital offers added value: does the early available information
lead to necessary and beneficial antibiotherapy changes or does the traditional diagnosis
with reporting one day later prove to be equivalent? If the new working method were to lead
to a clinically significant improvement in the established policy, this could necessitate an
organizational adjustment in the operation of the laboratory.
To gain insight into this, clinical data will be collected during the study period necessary
to evaluate the extent to which the faster results have had an impact on the antibiotherapy.
There is therefore no need for additional sample collection from the patient. All collected
data result from the standard hemoculture taken due to fever and/or frissons and concern
clinical data that is routinely collected to formulate antibiotic recommendations for
patients with positive hemocultures.
The following data will be collected pseudonymised for samples processed according to the new
best practice:
- sample number
- gender and year of birth, date of sample inclusion
- presumed source of infection, empirically administered antibiotic
- time-to-positivity of the blood culture bottle (TTP), type blood culture bottle
- result of gram stain & duration until reporting, any antibiotic change based on. gram
stain
- causative germ and resistance profile (e.g. ESBL, Multi-Drug Resistant P.aeruginosa,
...)
- result of antibiogram & duration until reporting (both methods), formulated advice, any
antibiotic change based on. initially formulated advice (effect on antibiotic decision
making), if necessary, additional advice and their associated impact on antibiotic
policy
- time-to-first effective antibiotherapy, time-to-effective antibiotherapy based on
antibiogram, time-to-optimal antibiotherapy, time-to-stop antibiotherapy, number of
antibiotic days, antibiotic exposure (different classes for example), duration of
empirical treatment (with T0 collection time of the hemoculture)